Search

Background: External cardioversion is effective to terminate persistent atrial flutter. Biphasic shocks have been shown to be superior to monophasic shocks for ventricular defibrillation and atrial fibrillation cardioversion. The purpose of this trial was to compare the efficacy of rectilinear biphasic versus standard damped sine wave monophasic shocks in symptomatic patients with typical atrial flutter. Methods: 135 consecutive patients were screened, 95 (70 males, mean age 62 ± 13 years) were included. Patients were randomly assigned to a monophasic or biphasic cardioversion protocol. Forty-seven patients randomized to the monophasic protocol received sequential shocks of 100, 150, 200, 300 and 360 J. Forty-eight patients with the biphasic protocol received 50, 75, 100, 150 or 200 J. Results: First-shock efficacy with 50-Joule, biphasic shocks (23/48 patients, 48%) was significantly greater than with the 100-Joule, monophasic waveform (13/47 patients, 28%, p = 0.04). The cumulative second-shock efficacy with the 50- and 75-Joule, biphasic waveform (39/48 patients, 81%) was significantly greater than with the 100- and 150-Joule, monophasic waveform (25/47 patients, 53%, p < 0.05). The cumulative efficacy for the higher energy levels showed naturally no significant difference between the two groups. The amount of the mean delivered energy was significantly lower in the biphasic group (76 ± 39 J) compared to the monophasic one (177 ± 78 J, p < 0.05). Conclusions: For transthoracic cardioversion of typical atrial flutter, biphasic shocks have greater efficacy and the mean delivered current is lower than for monophasic shocks. Therefore, biphasic cardioversion with lower starting energies should be recommended.

Objective: Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) after myocardial infarction (MI) can be complex and time-consuming. We only targeted the previously documented VTs and those with similar or longer cycle lengths. Methods: 30 patients with VTs after MI were included in the study. Voltage mapping was performed using an electro-anatomic mapping system (CARTOT). Stable VTs were mapped during tachycardia and unstable VTs during sinus rhythm. Results: Clinical VTs were stable in 16 (53%) and unstable in 14 (47%) patients, and ablation was successful in 11 (69%) and 9 patients (64%), respectively (p = 0.42). During follow-up (14 ± 6 months), 4 patients (25%) treated for stable and 6 (43%) for unstable VTs had recurrences (p = 0.82); ablation was successful in none and 2 (33%) of them, respectively. Non-target VTs were inducible in 11 (55%) of 20 patients after successful ablation and non-inducible in 9 (45%). During follow-up, inducibility of non-target VTs did not predict recurrences (9 vs. 11%, p = 0.88). Conclusions: Catheter ablation of VTs after MI can be successfully performed. Acute success rates seem to be similar for stable and unstable VTs. VTs faster than those documented clinically exert a minor effect on VT recurrences during follow-up.