Search

In this paper, we present a novel approach to track the origin of the metal complex structure from the topology of the α and β spin densities as an extension of the Linnett–Gillespie model. Usually, the theories that explain the metal–ligand interactions consider the disposition and the relative energies of the empty or occupied set of d orbitals, ignoring the spin contribution explicitly. Our quantum topological approach considers the spatial distribution of the α and β spin valence shells, and the energy interaction between them. We used the properties of the atomic graph, a topological object that summarises the charge concentrations and depletions on the valence shell of an atom in a molecule, and the interacting quantum atoms (IQA) energy partition scheme. Unlike the Linnett–Gillespie model, which is based on electron–electron repulsion, our approach states that the ligands provoke a redistribution of the electron density to maximize the nuclear–electron interactions in each spin valence shell to bypass the concentration of electron–electron interactions, resulting in a polarization pattern which determines the position of the ligands. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Quantum Chemical Topology (QCT) is a well established structural theoretical approach, but the development of its reactivity component is still a challenge. The hypothesis of this work is that the reactivity of an atom within a molecule is a function of its electronic population, its delocalization in the rest of the molecule, and the way it polarizes within an atomic domain. In this paper, we present a topological reactivity predictor for cabonyl additions, κ. It is a measure of the polarization of the electron density with the carbonyl functional group. κ is a model obtained from a QSAR procedure, using quantum-topological atomic descriptors and reported hydration equilibrium constants of carbonyl compounds. To validate the predictive capability of κ, we applied it to organic reactions, including a multicomponent reaction. κ was the only property that predicts the reactivity in each reaction step. The shape of κ can be interpreted as the change between two electrophilic states of a functional group, reactive and non-reactive.