GENERAL George C. Bond and Nigel C. Gibson, eds. Contested Terrains and Constructed Categories: Contemporary Africa in Focus. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2002. xxii + 474 pp. Bibliography. Index. $100.00. Cloth. $42.00. Paper. It is clear from reading this comprehensive book that a number of problems have become inherent in the way Africa as an idea and African studies as a discipline are taught and analyzed, primarily in North America. As the editors make clear, these failings are inseparable from how Africa has been defined historically and continues, tragically, to be misexplained, misrecognized, and therefore critically and analytically mislocated in the academy. The book is divided into three parts ("Challenges and Modes of Thinking"; "Contested Categories"; and "Violence of the World/Violence against the Body") comprising sixteen separate essays that address what may be categorized as "pressing" topics. These range from understanding power to the critical reading of colonial cartography, from the writing of African economic history as one component of the important project of cognitive decolonization to the postcolonial recasting of the now celebrated issue of African poverty, and finally how AIDS and other forms of violence against the body are, beyond their physically measurable aspects, culturally and socially formed and perpetuated. Contested Terrains is based on invited papers presented at Columbia University and intended to respond to problems of African misrepresentation. They include an impressive array of both descriptive and analytical counterpoints that aim to deconstruct the previously established body of fabrications and "exoticizing" (via different emphases and approaches) that have underpinned African studies in the past. The book's focus extends to social, economic, cultural, and health-related issues, with a well-organized and diverse array of topics. From my perspective, it accomplishes the important feat of analyzing these issues comprehensively without obscuring the big picture. This picture must, of course, combine a critical understanding of the past with current political and cultural categories that define problems and prospects for development and that may be particular to Africa. Clearly, any new work that deals with contemporary Africa must look to the past, not only to understand the continent's now familiar development difficulties, but also to be able to respond strategically to the newly emerging trends of institutional delegitimation and concomitant state collapse (e. …