1. Design of Timber Buildings for Deconstruction and Reuse — Three methods and five case studies
- Author
-
Sandin, Ylva, Shotton, Elizabeth, Cramer, Marlene, Sandberg, Karin, Walsh, St John, Östling, Janina, Cristescu, Carmen, González-Alegre, Violeta, Íñiguez-González, Guillermo, Llana, Daniel F, Carlsson, Anders, Uí Chúláin, Caitríona, Jackson, Nicola, García Barbero, Manuel, Zabala Mejia, Andres, Sandin, Ylva, Shotton, Elizabeth, Cramer, Marlene, Sandberg, Karin, Walsh, St John, Östling, Janina, Cristescu, Carmen, González-Alegre, Violeta, Íñiguez-González, Guillermo, Llana, Daniel F, Carlsson, Anders, Uí Chúláin, Caitríona, Jackson, Nicola, García Barbero, Manuel, and Zabala Mejia, Andres
- Abstract
There is a need for a shift towards circular economy in the construction sector and design philosophies as Design for Deconstruction and Reuse (DfDR) and Design for Adaptability (DfA) are being developed as means to design out waste and enhance resource efficiency. However, applying these philosophies is not yet common practice. The amount of DfDR/A timber buildings described in literature is limited. This study aims at increasing and spreading knowledge on DfDR/A for timber buildings. It has four goals: 1) To suggest methods to apply DfDR/A. 2) To suggest new design solutions. 3) To collect experiences on connections in relation to DfDR. 4) To suggest how guidelines for deconstruction and reuse can be formulated. The study presents three methods that all proved valuable in applying DfDR/A: one discussion-based method to improve an already existing timber building design, one indicator system to assess the DfDR/A potential of building designs, and one matrix to guide design decisions. We used the first method to conduct five case studies in four European countries. The studied designs were judged to be well or relatively well adapted for deconstruction and reuse already today. The fact that the studied buildings are all offsite manufactured and of modular composition benefits the deconstruction process, partly because construction and deconstruction are similar processes so that the knowledge and infrastructure that companies have can be directly transferred to enable deconstruction and reuse. Where large modules can be recovered, the time and energy needed for deconstruction as well as the risk for damage will be reduced. Disadvantages to deconstruction and reuse identified were typically linked to the complexity of building modules and that individual components are not independent. This was reflected as irreversible or hidden connections, inaccessible services, interconnected layers of the structural modules and many different component sizes. One of the case stu
- Published
- 2022