Search

Introduction: Computer tools based on artificial intelligence could aid clinicians in memory clinics by supporting diagnostic decision-making and communicating diagnosis and prognosis. We aimed to identify preferences of end-users, and barriers and facilitators for using computer tools in memory clinics., Methods: Between July and October 2020, we invited European clinicians (n=109, age 45±10y; 47% female) to participate in an online questionnaire. A second questionnaire was sent to patients (n=50, age 73±8y, 34% female) with subjective cognitive complaints (SCD, n=21), mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n=16) and dementia (n=13) and care partners (n=46, 65±12y, 54% female)., Results: The vast majority (75%) of all participants positively valued the use of computer tools in memory clinics. Facilitating factors included user-friendliness and increased diagnostic accuracy. Barriers included (doubts relating) reliability and validity of the tool and loss of clinical autonomy. The participants believe that tools should be used in addition to the current working method and not as a replacement., Discussion: Our results provide an important step in the iterative process of developing computer tools for memory clinics in co-creation with end-users and could guide successful implementation.

The use of telemedicine (telephone and video consultations) has increased over the past decades and has grown substantially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Multimorbidity, visual - and hearing impairment, cognitive impairment and lack of technical skills might complicate the use of telemedicine in frail elderly patients. Limited research on this topic is has been performed. The aim of this article is to investigate which elements of care could be performed by telemedicine and what patient characteristics are useful in selecting patients for telemedicine. To get more information about the use of telemedicine in frail elderly patients, an online survey was conducted amongst caregivers working in geriatric outpatient care departments in the Netherlands. 67 caregivers completed the survey. The results indicate there is limited experience in video consultations in this population. The experience so far is mainly positive. Caregivers indicate the following elements of care could be performed by telemedicine: follow-up consultations, taking an (hetero)anamnesis, medication review, conversations with multiple contacts or caregivers and informing about test results. Our advice is to decide in dialogue with patient and caregiver, which form of consultation is feasible, desirable and appropriate for every individual process and consultation.

Introduction: Delirium is a common disorder, affecting many patients in nursing-homes, with large impact on patients. Implementation of good care and treatment can potentially prevent development of a delirium or may reduce the severity or duration. This research was conducted to get an impression of delirium care in Dutch nursing homes, and of the implementation of the recommendations of the national guideline., Objectives: 1. How many Dutch nursing homes have a local protocol for delirium?2. To what extend do doctors, specialised in care for older people in nursing homes, screen, diagnose and treat delirium according to the Dutch guideline for delirium?, Methods: Between June and December 2016, Dutch nursing homes were approached with an online questionnaire. Data were collected in Survey Monkey and descriptive analyses were performed., Results: 68 nursing homes were included. 32% of the nursing homes had a local delirium protocol. 48% of the doctors knew about the national guideline delirium, 60% used preventive measures, and screening instruments were used in 98%. 29% used diagnostic criteria. Non-medical interventions were applied by 96%. In 98%, haloperidol was the drug of first choice. Preventive antipsychotics were prescribed by 21%., Conclusions: Only a third of the organisations developed a local delirium protocol. Standardising delirium care by a local delirium protocol, with special attention for prevention, diagnostics and aftercare of delirium, can be an important step in improving the quality of care in nursing homes.

In the Netherlands geriatric rehabilitation is possible (among others) for patients who are selected by a geriatrician at the emergency department of a hospital. The aim of this study was to investigate the rehabilitation trajectory of patients who were selected for geriatric rehabilitation at the emergency department after a single contact with the geriatrician and to identify patient factors related to rehabilitation outcome. Successful rehabilitation was defined as discharge to home or a residential care facility after a maximum of 6 months. All patients who in 2016 were selected for geriatric rehabilitation were included. Data were collected retrospectively from electronic patient files. 74 patients were included (mean age 84.7 years). 84% were successfully discharged home or to a residential care facility within six months. The presentation with a fall and the absence of a partner at home was higher in the unsuccessful group. In the successful group more patients lived independent and without professional help prior to rehabilitation. Noteworthy is that the analysed patient group is a frail group, considering the high one-year mortality (21,6%) and overall functional decline despite geriatric rehabilitation.

Background: Different forms of case management for dementia have emerged over the past few years. In the COMPAS study (Collaborative dementia care for patients and caregivers study), two prominent Dutch case management forms were studied: the linkage and the integrated care form., Aim of Study: Evaluation of the (cost)effectiveness of two dementia case management forms compared to usual care as well as factors that facilitated or impeded their implementation., Methods: A mixed methods design with a) a prospective, observational controlled cohort study with 2 years follow-up among 521 dyads of people with dementia and their primary informal caregiver with and without case management; b) interviews with 22 stakeholders on facilitating and impeding factors of the implementation and continuity of the two case management models. Outcome measures were severity and frequency of behavioural problems (NPI) for the person with dementia and mental health complaints (GHQ-12) for the informal caregiver, total met and unmet care needs (CANE) and quality adjusted life years (QALYs)., Results: Outcomes showed a better quality of life of informal caregivers in the integrated model compared to the linkage model. Caregivers in the control group reported more care needs than those in both case management groups. The independence of the case management provider in the integrated model facilitated the implementation, while the rivalry between multiple providers in the linkage model impeded the implementation. The costs of care were lower in the linkage model (minus 22 %) and integrated care model (minus 33 %) compared to the control group., Conclusion: The integrated care form was (very) cost-effective in comparison with the linkage form or no case management. The integrated care form is easy to implement.