Search

Objective: to compare the efficacy and toxicity of aflibercept and bevacizumab in combination with fOLfIRI in secondline therapy for patients with metastatic colon cancer.Materials and methods. we performed a retrospective analysis of data on patients with metastatic colon cancer treated in 9 clinics in the Russian federation. The inclusion criteria were as follows: metastatic or locally advanced colon cancer; treatment with bevacizumab or aflibercept plus fOLfIRI in the second-line therapy. The primary outcome measure was progression-free survival (PfS). Secondary outcome measures included objective response rate and incidence of adverse events.Results. A total of 271 patients with metastatic colon cancer who received second-line therapy with bevacizumab (n = 81) or aflibercept (n = 190) between 2014 and 2018 were selected for this study. Study groups were matched for main prognostic signs. The objective response rate was 18.1 % in the bevacizumab group and 20.5 % in the aflibercept group (p = 0.7). The median PfS was 5 months (95 % confidence interval 3.8–6.1) in the aflibercept group and 7 months (95 % confidence interval 0.81–2.1) in the bevacizumab group (hazard ratio 1.4; 95 % confidence interval 0.99–2.1; p = 0.04). multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that the type of the targeted drug independently had no effect on PfS (hazard ratio 1.3; 95 % confidence interval 0.9–1.9; p = 0.2). we observed no statistically significant differences in the incidence of complications of any grades between the groups (58 % vs 72 %, p = 0.1). Patients receiving aflibercept were more likely to develop grade III–Iv arterial hypertension (2 % vs 9.5 %) and diarrhea (0 % vs 5.4 %), whereas thrombotic complications were more common in the bevacizumab group (10 % vs 1.8 %).Conclusion. we observed no significant differences in objective response rate and PfS between patients with metastatic colon cancer receiving bevacizumab or aflibercept in combination with fOLfIRI as second-line therapy. The toxicity profiles were different. Our findings can be used for choosing an optimal targeted drug for second-line treatment.

Objective: to identify factors associated with efficacy of an aflibercept-chemotherapy combination in patients with metastatic colon cancer. Materials and methods. This retrospective multicenter study was conducted in 20 clinics from 15 regions of the Russian Federation. The main efficacy outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). We performed univariate and multivariate analysis to assess the impact of various factors of PFS. Results. Two hundred and fifty-seven patients received aflibercept-containing chemotherapy; of them, 175 participants (68.1 %) received it as a second-line therapy. The objective response rate and median PFS were 18.7% and 5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.2—5.8) respec -tively. The following factors were found to have a positive effect of PFS at multivariate analysis: grade I—II adverse events to aflibercept therapy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.58; 95 % CI 0.38—0.89; p = 0.01), therapy for concomitant diseases (HR 0.47; 95 % CI 0.29—0.76; p = 0.002), and ECOG performance status of 0 (HR 0.53; 95 % CI 0.34—0.81; p = 0.004). Patient with all 3 factors present had median PFS of 9 months, whereas patients without them demonstrated PFS of only 3 months (HR 1.9; 95 % CI 1.5—2.6; p