1. When does humoral memory enhance infection?
- Author
-
Nikas, Ariel, Ahmed, Hasan, Moore, Mia R., Zarnitsyna, Veronika I., and Antia, Rustom
- Subjects
MEMORY ,VIRUS diseases ,IMMUNE response ,INFECTION ,IMMUNE system - Abstract
Antibodies and humoral memory are key components of the adaptive immune system. We consider and computationally model mechanisms by which humoral memory present at baseline might increase rather than decrease infection load; we refer to this effect as EI-HM (enhancement of infection by humoral memory). We first consider antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) in which antibody enhances the growth of the pathogen, typically a virus, and typically at intermediate 'Goldilocks' levels of antibody. Our ADE model reproduces ADE in vitro and enhancement of infection in vivo from passive antibody transfer. But notably the simplest implementation of our ADE model never results in EI-HM. Adding complexity, by making the cross-reactive antibody much less neutralizing than the de novo generated antibody or by including a sufficiently strong non-antibody immune response, allows for ADE-mediated EI-HM. We next consider the possibility that cross-reactive memory causes EI-HM by crowding out a possibly superior de novo immune response. We show that, even without ADE, EI-HM can occur when the cross-reactive response is both less potent and 'directly' (i.e. independently of infection load) suppressive with regard to the de novo response. In this case adding a non-antibody immune response to our computational model greatly reduces or completely eliminates EI-HM, which suggests that 'crowding out' is unlikely to cause substantial EI-HM. Hence, our results provide examples in which simple models give qualitatively opposite results compared to models with plausible complexity. Our results may be helpful in interpreting and reconciling disparate experimental findings, especially from dengue, and for vaccination. Author summary: Humoral memory, generated by infection with a pathogen, can protect against subsequent infection by the same and related pathogens. We consider situations in which humoral memory is counterproductive and instead enhances infection by related pathogens. Numerous experiments have shown that the addition of binding antibody makes certain viruses more, rather than less, infectious; typically high levels of antibody are still protective, meaning that infectivity is maximized at intermediate 'Goldilocks' levels of antibody. Additionally, we consider the situation in which cross-reactive humoral memory dominates relative to the de novo response. Memory dominance has been documented for influenza infections, but whether it is harmful or not is unclear. We show computationally that both ADE and a certain type of competition between the cross-reactive and de novo responses translate into enhancement of infection in certain circumstances but not in others. We discuss the implications of our research for dengue infection, a common mosquito-transmitted viral infection, and vaccination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF