Search

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a public health issue. The diagnostic strategy for PCa is well codified and assessed by digital rectal examination, PSA testing and multiparametric MRI, which may or may not lead to prostate biopsies. The formal benefit of organized PCa screening, studied more than 10 years ago at an international scale and for all incomers, is not demonstrated. However, diagnostic and therapeutic modalities have evolved since the pivotal studies. The contribution of MRI and targeted biopsies, the widespread use of active surveillance for unsignificant PCa, the improvement of surgical techniques and radiotherapy… have allowed a better selection of patients and strengthened the interest for an individualized approach, reducing the risk of overtreatment. Aiming to enhance coverage and access to screening for the population, the European Commission recently promoted the evaluation of an organized PCa screening strategy, including MRI. The lack of screening programs has become detrimental to the population and must shift towards an early detection policy adapted to the risk of each individual., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The risk of recurrence is increased in localized high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). The implementation of an appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic strategy is essential. The objective of this update by the Prostate Committee of the French Association of Urology was to report the most recent data in the management of localized high-risk PCa., Material and Methods: This update is based on the data available in the literature on localized high-risk PCa. A PubMed search and narrative review of the recent data were performed in March 2022., Results: Compared with conventional imaging, PET-PSMA is more effective for the diagnosis of lymph nodes and distant metastases. Two recent randomized clinical trials have failed to prove the oncologic benefit of extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy (RP). Postoperatively, early salvage radiotherapy is the standard of care, with adjuvant radiotherapy becoming an option in case of unfavorable pathological criteria (ISUP 4-5, pT3±positive margins) in young patients. Although promising, perioperative systemic therapies (chemotherapy, second-generation hormonotherapy) cannot be recommended at this time when the patient is treated by RP. Regarding radiotherapy, prophylactic lymph node irradiation during prostatic irradiation was associated with improved biochemical and metastasis-free survival in a recent randomized trial but it is still controversial. Since the publication of the results of the STAMPEDE trial, the addition of abiraterone acetate to radiation-hormone therapy should be considered the new standard of care for patients with localized (very) high-risk PCa, according to the inclusion criteria of the study., Conclusion: The most recent data of the literature regarding the management of high-risk localized PCa redefine the diagnostic performance of molecular imaging, the timing of postoperative radiotherapy, the oncologic benefit of pelvic lymph node treatment, and the intensification of systemic therapies., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Patients treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) may experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) in approximately 30% of cases. Recently, advances in imaging modalities and in particular Positron-Emission Tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging allow for better detection and characterization of lesions outside the prostatic bed at recurrence. Thus, treatment at BCR can be significantly improved by a tailored strategy based on new generation imaging. A more precise and accurate staging of the disease at recurrence paves the way to more appropriate treatment, potentially translating into better survival outcomes of these patients. This review therefore highlights the interest of PET/CT at the time of BCR, its superiority over standard imaging in terms of staging, and its impact on guiding the different therapeutic possibilities depending on the site, number, and volumes of recurrence. Indeed, we will discuss below about different strategies and their indications: salvage radiotherapy of the prostate bed, systemic therapies, stereotactic body radiotherapy and others therapeutical strategies. The various innovative approaches based on PET/CT implementation are partly underway within protocol trials to prove their benefits on clinically meaningful endpoints. © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved., Competing Interests: Disclosure of interest A. Ruffion, M. Lasserre, P. Sargos, G. Fiard, E. Barret and J.-B. Beauval have no competing interest to declare regarding this article. C. Dariane declares competing interest by participating in clinical trials (as co-investigator, non-principal experimenter, or collaborator) for Janssen and Bayer; receiving compensation for advisory consultancies from Janssen, Bayer, Astellas; being invited to conference as a speaker by Janssen and being invited to congresses with paid expenses by Bayer. M. Rouprêt de declares competing interest by participating in clinical trials (as principal investigator, coordinator, or principal experimenter) for Roche, Janssen, AstraZeneca and by receiving compensation for advisory consultancies from Astellas, Ferring, Roche, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Bayer and Ipsen. G. Ploussard declares competing interest by participating in clinical trials (as principal investigator, coordinator, or principal experimenter) for Ferring, Janssen, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Bayer; by participating in clinical trials (as co-investigator, non-principal experimenter, or collaborator) for Ferring, Janssen, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Bayer; receiving compensation for advisory consultancies from Ferring, Janssen, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Bayer, Astellas, Intuitive, Thermo Fisher; being invited to conference as a speaker by Ferring, Janssen, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Bayer, Astellas, Intuitive, Thermo Fisher. M. Gauthé declares competing interest by participating in clinical trials (as principal investigator, coordinator, or principal experimenter) for Curium Pharma, ABX Biochemical compounds, Endocyte/Novartis; receiving compensation for advisory consultancies from Curium Pharma; being invited to conference as a speaker by Novartis, Astellas; being invited to congresses with paid expenses by Curium Pharma, ABX Biochemical compounds, Endocyte/Novartis. G. Fromont declares competing interest by being invited as a speaker to conference by AstraZeneca and Astellas. R. Mathieu declares competing interest by receiving compensation for advisory consultancies from Bayer, Astellas, Janssen and by being invited as a speaker by Bayer, Astellas and Janssen. G. Roubaud declares competing interest by participating in clinical trials (as principal investigator, coordinator, or principal experimenter) for Bayer, Janssen, AAA, Novartis, Astellas, MSD, AstraZeneca; by receiving compensation for advisory consultancies from Merck and AstraZeneca; by being invited as a speaker to conferences by Jansses, AAA, Novartis, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Merck and by being invited to congresses with paid expenses by Astellas, Janssen and AstraZeneca. L. Brureau, G. Créhange, R. Renard-Penna did not disclose their conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.)

Introduction: The aim of this narrative review conducted by the Prostate Cancer Committee of the French Association of Urology (CC-AFU) was to provide an update on the current evidence for the impact of PET/CT in the management of men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC)., Material and Methods: This review is based on data available in the literature on PET/CT imaging for staging nmCRPC patients. A PubMed search and narrative review of the data were performed in March 2022. Only articles in French or English were considered., Results: Current guidelines recommend bone scan and CT scan as standard imaging modalities for staging and follow-up of patients with nmCRPC. Nearly one-third of asymptomatic patients with presumed nmCRPC ultimately have metastatic disease on conventional imaging. Increasing reports have shown that conventional imaging has limited accuracy in detecting metastatic disease in nmCRPC patients, leading to the development of next-generation imaging techniques. In a retrospective study, 18F-choline PET/CT detected distant metastases in 27/58 high-risk nmCRPC patients with prior negative conventional imaging. The implementation of radiolabeled ligands of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT in staging strategy has resulted in metastasis detection in 45% to 98% of patients with presumptive nmCRPC on conventional imaging. Such an early diagnosis of metastatic CRPC may allow patients to be referred for metastasis-directed therapies (i.e. stereotactic body radiotherapy), aimed at prolonging the efficacy of systemic therapies and improving clinical outcomes. However, current data are not strong enough to recommend this strategy, which must be properly evaluated in clinical trials. Indeed, the use of molecular imaging may lead to inappropriate undertreatment if the second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors (darolutamide, enzalutamide, apalutamide), which prolong life, are not used in the subgroup of patients with high PSA velocity (PSA doubling time <10 months)., Conclusion: Implementation of PSMA-PET/CT in the staging strategy would result in a migration of disease stage to extra-pelvic, M1 disease in at least half of presumed nmCRPC patients. The unprecedented accuracy of PSMA-PET/CT may pave the way for a more personalized treatment strategy. However, no data yet support this strategy for all nmCRPC patients as no oncologic benefit of early detection of M1 disease or MDT has been demonstrated. © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved., Competing Interests: Disclosure of interest A. Ruffion, M. Lasserre, P. Sargos, G. Fiard, E. Barret, J.-B. Beauval, and P. Rocchi have no competing interest to declare regarding this article. M. Gauthé declares competing interest by participating in clinical trials (as principal investigator, coordinator, or principal experimenter) for Curium Pharma, ABX Biochemical compounds, Endocyte/Novartis; participating in clinical trials (as co-investigator, non-principal experimenter, or collaborator) for Amgen; receiving compensation for advisory consultancies from Curium Pharma; being invited to conference as a speaker by Novartis, Astellas. C. Dariane declares competing interest by participating in clinical trials (as co-investigator, non-principal experimenter, or collaborator) for Janssen and Bayer; receiving compensation for advisory consultancies from Janssen, Bayer, Astellas; being invited to conference as a speaker by Janssen and being invited to congresses with paid expenses by Bayer. M. Rouprêt de declares competing interest by participating in clinical trials (as principal investigator, coordinator, or principal experimenter) for Roche, Janssen, AstraZeneca and by receiving compensation for advisory consultancies from Astellas, Ferring, Roche, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Bayer and Ipsen. G. Ploussard declares competing interest by participating in clinical trials (as principal investigator, coordinator, or principal experimenter) for Ferring, Janssen, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Bayer; by participating in clinical trials (as co-investigator, non-principal experimenter, or collaborator) for Ferring, Janssen, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Bayer; receiving compensation for advisory consultancies from Ferring, Janssen, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Bayer, Astellas, Intuitive, Thermo Fisher; being invited to conference as a speaker by Ferring, Janssen, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Bayer, Astellas, Intuitive, Thermo Fisher. G. Fromont declares competing interest by being invited as a speaker to conference by AstraZeneca and Astellas. R. Mathieu declares competing interest by receiving compensation for advisory consultancies from Bayer, Astellas, Janssen and by being invited as a speaker by Bayer, Astellas and Janssen. G. Roubaud declares competing interest by participating in clinical trials (as principal investigator, coordinator, or principal experimenter) for Bayer, Janssen, AAA, Novartis, Astellas, MSD, AstraZeneca; by receiving compensation for advisory consultancies from Merck and AstraZeneca; by being invited as a speaker to conferences by Jansses, AAA, Novartis, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Merck and by being invited to congresses with paid expenses by Astellas, Janssen and AstraZeneca. L. Brureau, G. Créhange, R. Renard-Penna did not disclose their conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.)

Purpose: Periprostatic fat has a metabolic activity on the prostate via cytokines that act paracrine on several signaling pathways including tumorigenesis. We investigated whether there was an association between preprostatic fat abundance and prostate cancer (PCa) aggressiveness., Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective study including patients who underwent radical prostatectomy in our center from the prospective RESCAP database. Preoperative MRIs were re-read and different measurements of preprostatic fat (PPF) were performed. The maximum thickness (PPFmax) and the minimum thickness (PPFmin) were measured on a median T2 sagittal section. The total volume of preprostatic fat (PPFV) and volume normalized by prostate volume (NPPFV) were calculated semi-automatically by segmentation on continuous axial sections of 3mm. The association of these parameters with the aggressiveness criteria of PCa (ISUP 3-5 on biopsies and on operative specimen, intermediate or high-risk disease according to D'AMICO, PSA>10, upgrading risk at radical prostatectomy) was measured as well as the association between normal, overweight, and obese BMI classes and the aggressiveness criteria used., Results: One hundred and twenty-one men were included in this study. In both the univariate analysis and the multivariate analysis, none of the preprostatic fat measurements (PPFmax, PPFmin, PPFV and NPPFV) were associated with PCa aggressiveness criteria. There was also no association between BMI class and tumor aggressiveness., Conclusion: In this study, there is no association between the abundance of preprostatic fat and PCa aggressiveness according to the periprostatic fat measurements achieved., Level of Evidence: III., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Current therapeutic developments in prostate cancer (PCa) tend to increasingly personalize the treatment strategy, in particular as a function of tumor genomics. Recently, poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARPi) inhibitors have shown their efficacy at the stage of castration resistance, in case of alteration of DNA repair genes in tumor tissue., Material and Methods: A narrative review was carried out on recent data in the literature since 2000. A consensus among the members of the Committee was obtained in order to synthesize the current data, with a particular focus on the practical considerations regarding indications and developments of molecular testing circuits concerning DNA repair genes, for theranostics purpose., Results: The establishment of an efficient molecular testing network is based on the multidisciplinary organization of the various actors and the coordination of all material resources. Its goal is the routine search for somatic mutations (in tumor tissue) of BRCA1/2 genes in patients who may benefit from PARPi. The current indications are for BRCA1 or 2 mutated castration-resistant metastatic PCa after next-generation hormone therapy failure. The demand for molecular testing must be decided in the tumor board, giving priority to archived tissue less than 10 years old. In case of unsuccess, biopsies of the primary or metastases, or even analysis of circulating tumor DNA, may be necessary. Any demand for a genetic test on tumor tissue must be accompanied by detailed information for the patient on the possible familial consequences, in case of associated germline mutation., Conclusion: This article aims to guide the practical implementation of molecular testing circuits for DNA repair genes alterations, in order to guide the therapeutic management of patients with advanced PCa., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The purpose of the guidelines national committee CCAFU was to propose updated french guidelines for localized and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa)., Methods: A Medline search was achieved between 2013 and 2016, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of PCa, to evaluate different references with levels of evidence., Results: Epidemiology, classification, staging systems, diagnostic evaluation are reported. Disease management options are detailed. Recommandations are reported according to the different clinical situations. Active surveillance is a major option in low risk PCa. Radical prostatectomy remains a standard of care of localized PCa. The three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is the technical standard. A dose of > 74Gy is recommended. Moderate hypofractionation provides short-term biochemical control comparable to conventional fractionation. In case of intermediate risk PCa, radiotherapy can be combined with short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In case of high risk disease, long-term ADT remains the standard of care. ADT is the backbone therapy of metastatic disease. In men with metastases at first presentation, upfront chemotherapy combined with ADT should be considered as a new standard. In case of metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC), new hormonal treatments and chemotherapy provide a better control of tumor progression and increase survival., Conclusions: These updated french guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for the diagnosis and treatment for prostate cancer. © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved., (© 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.)

Introduction: The ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) Consensus Conferences between 2012 and 2015 made recommendations regarding the classification, staging, prognostic factors of adult tumors from kidney, prostate, bladder and testis. The main points of these recommendations are highlighted in this article., Materials and Methods: This article is based on a systematic literature search by using different keywords "cancer, kidney, prostate, bladder, testis, pathology, classification" from Pubmed database. Only publications between 2012 and 2015 were retained., Results: The different Consensus conferences since 2012 in uropathology have provided international guidelines for the classification, grading and staging of tumors in kidney, bladder, prostate and testis. We identified in this article the main points of these new guidelines that are about to be published in the new 2016 WHO classification of urogenital tract tumors in adult., Conclusion: New pathological guidelines in urogenital tumors have to be taken into account for a better diagnosis and therapy., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Handling and pathologic analysis of radical prostatectomy specimens are crucial to confirm the diagnosis of prostate cancer and evaluate prognostic criteria., Material and Methods: A systematic review of the scientific literature was performed in the Medline database (PubMed), using different associations of the following keywords: prostate cancer; prostatectomy; specimen; handling; pathology; tumor staging; Gleason score; surgical margin; prognosis; frozen section; lymph node; biomarkers. A particular search was done on specimen management and characterization of tissue prognostic factors., Results: Handling of both radical prostatectomy specimen and lymph node dissection is standardized according to international criteria. Although the main histoprognostic factors are still Gleason score, pathologic staging and margin status, these criteria have been refined these last 10 years, allowing to improve the prediction of relapse after surgical treatment., Conclusion: The standardization of handling and pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens will be mandatory for treatment uniformization according to risk stratification in prostate cancer and personalization of therapeutic approaches., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Diagnosis, localization of recurrence in the management of prostate cancer patients with increasing concentrations of tumor serum markers is crucial for treatment planning of the patients. The present review describes the role of prostate MRI and (18) Fcholine PET/computed tomography (CT) in tumor detection and extent, when there is a suspicion of residual or recurrent disease after treatment of prostate cancer., Method: A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching in the PUB MED/MEDLINE database searching for articles in French or English published between the last 12years., Results: In patient with a clinical suspicion of recurrence after treatment for prostate cancer, imaging can be used to distinguish between local recurrence and metastatic disease. (11)C-choline PET/CT and pelvic multiparametric MR imaging (mp MRI) are complementary in this indication. In this paper, the current status of imaging techniques used for the staging of patients with suspected locally recurrent or metastatic disease in patients treated for prostate cancer were reviewed., Conclusion: Mp MRI of the prostate may be valuable imaging modality for the detection and localization of local recurrence. C-choline PET/CT offers an advantage in detecting metastatic disease to lymph node and bone., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The widespread use of prostate cancer screening has led to a stage migration resulting in an increase in the diagnosis of low-risk disease, which currently accounts for 40-50% of diagnosed forms. New therapeutic strategies have been developed in order to minimize the risk of overtreatment., Methods: A systematic review of the literature over the past 20 years was performed using the Medline database. The literature selection was based on evidence and practical considerations., Results: Low-risk tumors are conventionally defined by the d'Amico classification. The use of multiparametric MRI helps to better characterize these tumors. The contribution of molecular biology remains to be determined in clinical practice. Novel therapeutic options for low-risk disease are currently being evaluated., Conclusion: The new therapeutic strategies are evolving. They seek to reduce overtreatment without compromising oncological success., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Literature showed the impact of surgical margin status on prognosis after radical prostatectomy (mostly on biochemical survival). Margin status is an easy self-evaluation of surgical practice to assess. The aim of this paper was to define what a positive surgical margin (PSM) is and how to prevent the occurrence, to precise the impact on survival and how to treat., Method: A literature analysis with Pubmed has been performed to 2012, furthermore conclusions of the main congresses with selection committee and review publication have also been studied., Results: PSM is defined as "tumor cells touching the ink on the specimen edge". The most frequent reported incidence is between 15 to 20%. Margin status remains one of the major criteria to determine the need of adjuvant radiotherapy after surgery. Quality of life is not or only lightly modified by radiotherapy with the current techniques. Adjuvant radiotherapy improves biological survival but is synonymous with overtreatment in many times. Salvage radiotherapy has to be quickly performed after Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) relapse (PSA<1 ng/mL even<0.5 ng/mL)., Conclusion: This literature review did not allow to suggest superiority of one surgical technique over another. In the same way, the kind of dissection i.e. bladder neck or neurovascular bundle preservation does no clearly modify PSM rate. However, it seems logical to "customize" dissection according to prostate cancer characteristics (D'Amico criteria for instance) guided with multiparametric MRI. Intrafascial dissection has to be applied only to low risk. Lastly, the debate between adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy is always ongoing., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare peri-operative outcomes of open radical prostatectomy (ORP) to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in a single French institution., Methods: Between 1998 and 2003, 72 patients underwent ORP followed by 279 LRP between 2003 and 2010 for a clinically localized prostate cancer. Demographic, peri-operative and pathological data in the ORP and LRP groups were analyzed and compared., Results: In the ORP group, compared to the LRP group, the following significant differences were found: patients were older (63.1 years versus 65.6), initial PSA was higher (10.2 ng/mL versus 6.7) and the proportion of T1c was higher (62.8 % versus 80.6 %). Operative blood loss (1500 mL versus 500) and length of hospitalization (9.0 days versus 6.3) were higher in the ORP group (P<0.001). Operative time was longer in the LRP group (250 min versus 160; P<0 .001). There was no significant difference regarding length of catheterization (average of 8.5 days). Anastomotic strictures were more frequent following ORP (P<0.001). Positive margins proportion in the ORP group (7.1 %) was lower than that observed in the LRP group (28.7 %) (P=0.001). Patients in the ORP group achieved early continence more frequently (P<0.01) but at 12 months postoperatively there was no significant difference., Conclusion: Patients in the LRP group had lower operative blood losses and a shorter length of hospitalization. However, in the ORP group, operative time was shorter and positive margins rate was lower., (Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Objectives: The International Prostate Score Symptom (IPSS) and the question of quality of life (QOL-Q) associated were used in this study for monitoring patients treated for localized prostate cancer (P-Ca)., Patients and Methods: Three groups treated with radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (RT) or brachytherapy (BRACHY) completed the self-administered questionnaire IPSS and Q-QOL before treatment (bef-TT), after 3 months and once a year for 5 years., Results: The study included 40 PR, 40 RT and 40 BRACHY. There was no difference between the three groups in bef-TT for the IPSS and Q-QOL or in the patients' characteristics, and P-Ca except for age and a higher PSA in the RT group (70.6 years old and 10.0 ng/mL vs. 66.5/66.2 and 7.1/6.2 for RP and CURIE respectively). The impact, no matter what treatment they received, was significant after the third month and then went back to the pre-AN1 at TT. The analysis by group treatment showed no significant difference between groups at 3months and during the first 4 years of follow-up. In the fifth year the RT group had a greater IPSS than BRACHY and PR groups (P<0.04)., Conclusion: This study showed no degradation of the IPSS or Q-QOL remote treatment of localized prostate cancer. Urinary incontinence has been partially exploring. His study would have allowed a better urinary quality of life analysis in these patients., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The sub Comittee prostate of the CCAFU established guidelines for diagnostic, treatment, evaluation and standart of care of prostate cancer., Methods: Guidelines 2010 were updated based on systematic literature search performed by the sub-Comittee in Medline and PubMed databases to evaluate references, levels of evidence and grade of recommandation., Results: Pathological examination of the tissue specimens was defined specifically for Gleason score according to ISP 2005 recommandations. Prostate and pelvis RMN became the reference in terms of radiological exam. Individual and early diagnosis of prostate cancer was defined and role of PSA was precised. Active surveillance became one of the standart of care of low-risk tumors, radical prostatectomy remained one of the options for all risk group tumors, length of hormonotherapy in association with radiotherapy was precised according to the risk group. Side effects of hormonotherapy treament needed specific supervision ; hormonotherapy had no indication in case of non metastatic tumors and intermittent hormonotherapy in metastatic tumors. New hormonal drugs in pre and post chemotherapy and bone target drugs opened new therapeutics pathways., Conclusion: From 2010 to 2013, standarts of care of prostate cancer were modified because of results of prospective studies and new therapeutics. They allowed precise treatments for each specific clinical situation. In the future, multidisciplinary treatments for high risk tumors, time of adjuvant treatment and sequencies of new hormonal treatment had to be defined., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: To summarize the indications and outcomes of low dose-rate prostate brachytherapy with permanent implants., Methods: Bibliographic database PubMed was searched with prostate cancer and brachytherapy as keywords from 1995 to 2012., Results: The main indication of prostate brachytherapy is the favorable group, but it could be proposed to patients with an intermediate prognostic group if the PSA is ≤ 15 ng/mL or if the Gleason score is 7 (3+4), under cover of a prostate MRI without any extra-capsular extension. Oncologic results are similar to those of surgery or external beam irradiation (EBRT), with a 10-yr biochemical control rate approaching 90%. Urinary toxicity is common during the year following the implant, mainly irritative symptoms; 5 to 15% of patients experienced acute urinary retention. A prostate volume higher than 50 cc or an initial high international prostatic symptom score (IPSS) are predictive of toxicity and are recognized as relative contraindications of the technique. Sexual activity is maintained in 60% of patients., Conclusion: Brachytherapy must be proposed as a validated option beside active surveillance, surgery and EBRT., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: An elevated PSA and a negative prostate biopsy (PB) can be a false negative PB that ignores a prostate cancer (PCa) or a false positive PSA not related to PCa. The objective of this study was to analyze a group of patients who had a negative first BP for a PSA superior to 4 ng/mL and at least one additional PB and to compare these cases with controls who had the diagnosis PCa from the first PB., Methods: Retrospective single-center study comparing patients with an elevated PSA and repeat biopsy following a first negative PB and patients with PCa diagnosed from the first PB., Results: The 63 cases were younger than the 75 controls and had more often a normal digital rectal examination. Their prostate volume was larger and their number of PSA before the first PB lower: this corresponded to a lower PSA in the second (7/64), third (6/31), fourth (3/9) and sixth (1/1) PB. Among these cases with PCa, the length of core invaded by cancer and the total length of cancer of the entire PB were smaller than controls. In 76% of cases, the Gleason score among cases was 6 or less., Conclusion: PCa discovered on repeat biopsy had features of better prognosis than those of controls. We propose an algorithm for management of patients with elevated PSA and negative first PB., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Two randomised trials and negative conclusion of the FDA about inhibitors of 5 alpha-reductase in prevention of prostate cancer need a revision of the indications of these drugs., Methods: After description of fundamentals data, review of the literature in PubMed library was performed to analyse the indications of these drugs according to the different stages of prostate cancer., Results: Even if PCPT and REDUCE studies showed a decrease of cancers with the use of 5 alpha-reductase (5ARI) but with side effects, there is no indication for prostate cancer prevention by these drugs. In the same way, despite the results of REEDEM study, there is no indication of these drugs in active surveillance., Conclusion: Despite the large interest of these drugs, no recommendation can be given for indications of 5ARI in prevention or treatment of prostate cancer., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Lymph node invasion is the first step of metastatic evolution of prostate cancer. In this case, today, no local treatment should be proposed. Detection of lymph node invasion is performed by CT-scan and RMI, which show hypertrophied nodes. No difference in term of sensibility and specificity is observed between CT-scan and RMI. Invaded nodes are defined by modifications of size, form, and aspect of the architecture of nodes. Sentinel node belongs to expert centers. Surgical lymphadenectomy remains the best way to evaluate lymph node status. Limited to ilio-obturator land, it underestimates the risk of lymph node invasion: Extended lymph node excision defined by the association of bilateral ilio-obturator, internal iliaca and external iliaca lymphadenectomy should be systematically proposed to intermediate and high risk prostate cancer. A "well done" lymphadenectomy is represented by more than 10 nodes removed. Lymph node invasion represents bad prognosis. However, therapeutic value and influence of prognosis of lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer is still not established. Therefore, one or two invade lymph nodes represented a population of patients with better prognosis, specially if no capsular effraction is observed. After radical prostatectomy, in case of lymph node invasion, immediate hormonotherapy is the standard; however, this treatment is discussed in case of low number of invaded nodes (one or two) and if postoperative PSA is equal to zero. In this case, radiotherapy is still in evaluation and chemotherapy has no indication., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Partial nephrectomy is now recognized as the standard treatment for tumors less than 7cm. The oncological results are comparable to those obtained by total nephrectomy, while preserving kidney function. Our objective was to describe our experience and research factors associated with complications, recurrence and death., Patients and Methods: Partial nephrectomy performed in our center by June 1996 to December 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic and tumors characteristics, postoperative complications and patient outcomes were identified. Factors associated with complications and survival were investigated by regression tests., Results: Of the 96 patients enrolled (mean age 61.4 years±12.8), 13 had renal insufficiency (serum creatinine 120 to 212μmol/L). The mean tumor size was 32mm (±13.9) and 57 (79.2%) corresponded to clear cell carcinoma. The overall rate of postoperative complications was 26%, including 8.3% of hemorrhagic complications and 3.1% of urinary complications. None of the analyzed variables were associated with the occurrence of complications. With a mean of 2 years and 9 months follow-up (±28months), eight patients (11.1%) had tumor recurrence. Multifocal tumors as well as postoperative complications were associated with risk of recurrence. Three patients with positive tumor margins were monitored with no evidence of progression (with 71, 42 and 12 months of follow-up)., Conclusion: Our single-center retrospective study of partial nephrectomy for renal tumor showed medium-term oncological results similar to those reported in the total nephrectomy with the advantage of nephron preservation. The results of studies by conventional surgery such as that we report should be a benchmark for laparoscopic surgery., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Localized prostate tumors have various clinical, biological and histopathological characteristics that lead to different progression profiles. High-risk prostate cancer has been classically defined by clinical examination, PSA levels and histopathological data. High-risk prostate cancer has usually a worse outcome, but classic stratification predictive of outcome for prostate cancer is a matter of debate concerning its accuracy., Methods: A systematic review of the literature on high-risk prostate cancer over the 15 last years was carried out on Medline database. The literature selection was based on evidence and practical considerations., Results: A great deal of scientific work have been deployed to prove that high-risk prostate cancer should be approached by teamwork including radio-hormone therapy, systemic treatment with long term use of LH-RH and a radical prostatectomy with adequate lymph node dissection. Selection of patients is essential to define individualized therapeutic strategy and timing for every modality should come as a consensus of medical supported evidence., Conclusion: Accurate patient selection and multimodal treatment offer the best therapeutic option in high-risk prostate cancer., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Seminal vesicle biopsies (SVB) in the staging of prostate cancer are controversial. Our main objective was to assess their contribution before radiation therapy or brachytherapy. Our secondary objective was to compare pathologic findings of the SVB to the magnetic resonance imaging's (MRI) results., Patients and Methods: From 2000 to 2008, 135 men (median age: 70 years) with prostate cancer (cT1a to cT3) underwent SVB right and left. The median PSA was 12 ng/ml. The median Gleason score was 7. Forty-one patients had an endorectal MRI. The median follow-up was 47 months., Results: Seminal vesicle involvement was found in 10% of patients. In 9.2% of cases, the biopsy was not contributive. The risk of invasion was significantly associated with the stage T3, the Gleason score up to 7 and the percentage of prostate positive biopsies. A MRI was performed in 41 cases: the correlation between MRI and SVB for the invasion of seminal vesicle was significant but moderate (kappa=0.38). The complications rate of SVB was 10%., Conclusion: SVB were a simple and profitable method. They have provided supplementary information that could improve the staging and that could lead to the make use of an appropriate treatment. This information was comparable to the information provided by MRI. Further studies should establish their role in relation to MRI and in particular confirm the best specificity of the SVB., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Serum PSA is known to rise slightly following an attentive digital rectal examination (DRE) and dramatically following prostatic biopsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the PCA3 response in these situations., Patients and Methods: In 15 consecutive men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate and who gave their informed consent, urinary PCA3 was determined twice: at a first consultation, urine being sampled immediately after an attentive DRE and second within 2 hours after the biopsy. The mean interval between the two samplings was 14 days (median 15). PCA3 measurements were centralized and performed by the same biologist. At least twelve cores were taken using a biopsy gun with an 18-gauge needle. Changes in PCA3 levels were studied., Results: Mean age of the 15 men was 67.3 years (range 50.9-79.1). Mean (median) pre-biopsy total and %free PSA were respectively 6.6 ng/ml (5.7) and 15.8% (15.5). Mean prostate volume was 43.6 cm(3). Seven patients complained of mild LUTS. DRE was suspicious in eight patients. Of the 15 men, 6 (40%) had adenocarcinoma on biopsy (all clinically confined to the prostate). Median (range) Gleason score was 6 (6-7). Median PCA3 score (range) before and after prostatic biopsy were respectively 36 (9-287) and 27 (5-287) with no significant difference between the two groups (sign test for matched series p > 0.05). The median variation between pre- and post-biopsy PCA3 was -18%. When considering a PCA3 cut-off of 35, two patients changed group: one patient had 51 before and 31 after (PSA 4.6; no cancer on prostate biopsy) and the second had 36 before and 27 after (PSA 5.6; low-risk PCa). The figure represents the PCA3 values for each case (squares for the pre-biopsy and diamonds for the post-biopsy). When considering only the six patients with PCA, median (mean) PCA3 score before and after prostatic biopsy were respectively 51.5 (60.8) and 44.5 (54.8) with no significant difference between the two groups (sign test for matched series p > 0.5) and a median variation between pre- and post-biopsy PCA3 of 1.5%., Conclusions: Prostate biopsy did not alter significantly urinary PCA3 value. This confirms what was theoretically expected., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the prognostic decrease rate of PSA in patients treated with androgen suppression (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa)., Methods: We identified in our database CaP patients with histologically documented, treated with SA alone and for whom vital status with a minimum follow-up of 6 months (except death beforehand) was established. Patient characteristics and CaP and PSA at baseline, PSA nadir, time of reaching the nadir PSA (DAN) and the ratio of the DAN/nadir value (ratio DAN/Nadir) were analyzed in relation to progression-free survival, specific and overall survival., Results: One hundred ninety eight patients met the inclusion criteria and the median was 61.5 months (range 4.8 to 233). The median PSA at the start of the SA were 37.1 ng/mL and the median nadir PSA was 0.48 ng/mL. The median time to progression was 23.6 months. The median specific and overall survivals were 94 and 78 months, respectively. In univariate analysis, predictors of progression-free survival were PSA before SA, PSA nadir, DAN, DAN ratio/nadir, Gleason score, the percentage of core positive prostate biopsy and the status of bone scintigraphy. Except for PSA before SA which was no longer significant, predictors of specific and overall survival were similar and added the biochemical response (decrease of more than 50% of PSA) to a second hormonal manipulation during the biological progression. In multivariate analysis, the nadir PSA and the ratio DAN/Nadir remained significant predictors., Conclusion: These results have confirmed in one hand the predictive value of survival in patients DAN SA for CaP: achieving faster nadir PSA was associated with shorter survival. They have introduced in the other hand the new concept of DAN/Nadir PSA which provides independent prognostic information., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this multicenter study was to determine the prognostic value of the depth of invasion of lamina propria and more specifically the influence of the invasion of the muscularis mucosae on survival parameters in T1 bladder carcinoma., Patients: Six urological centers included patients between 1994 and 2004 who had an initial T1 bladder tumor. All T1 tumors were substaged according to the muscularis mucosae (MM) invasion into T1a (no invasion beyond the MM) and T1b (invasion beyond MM but preserving the muscle). Among the 387 patients included, 269 (69.5%) were found T1a and 118 (30.5%) T1b. Mean follow-up was 45.4 months. T1a and T1b groups were comparable except for tumor grade that was higher in T1b (p<0.001)., Results: Survival without recurrence was not significantly different between T1a and T1b groups (p<0.3) but T1a stage was found as an independent factor for survival without progression (RR=0.49; IC 95%=[0.71-0.90]), specific survival (RR=0.33; IC 95%=[0.16-0.67]) and global survival (RR=0.52; IC 95%=[0.32-0.85])., Conclusion: This study, the largest on the subject to our knowledge, have shown that muscularis mucosae invasion was a prognostic factor for survival without progression, specific survival, and global survival. We support that routine pathological assessment of the level of MM invasion in patients with stage T1 bladder cancer should be included in the histopathological report., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)