Search

CoREST family of transcriptional co-repressors regulates gene expression and cell fate determination during development. CoREST co-repressors recruit with different affinity the histone demethylase LSD1 (KDM1A) and the deacetylases HDAC1/2 to repress with variable strength the expression of target genes. CoREST protein levels are differentially regulated during cell fate determination and in mature tissues. However, regulatory mechanisms of CoREST co-repressors at the protein level have not been studied. Here, we report that CoREST (CoREST1, RCOR1) and its homologs CoREST2 (RCOR2) and CoREST3 (RCOR3) interact with PIASγ (protein inhibitor of activated STAT), a SUMO (small ubiquitin-like modifier)-E3-ligase. PIASγ increases the stability of CoREST proteins and facilitates their SUMOylation by SUMO-2. Interestingly, the SUMO-conjugating enzyme, Ubc9 also facilitates the SUMOylation of CoREST proteins. However, it does not change their protein levels. Specificity was shown using the null enzymatic form of PIASγ (PIASγ-C342A) and the SUMO protease SENP-1, which reversed SUMOylation and the increment of CoREST protein levels induced by PIASγ. The major SUMO acceptor lysines are different and are localized in nonconserved sequences among CoREST proteins. SUMOylation-deficient CoREST1 and CoREST3 mutants maintain a similar interaction profile with LSD1 and HDAC1/2, and consequently maintain similar repressor capacity compared with wild-type counterparts. In conclusion, CoREST co-repressors form protein complexes with PIASγ, which acts both as SUMO E3-ligase and as a protein stabilizer for CoREST proteins. This novel regulation of CoREST by PIASγ interaction and SUMOylation may serve to control cell fate determination during development.

The central nervous system regulates neuronal excitability by macromolecular signalling complexes that consist of functionally related proteins, including neurotransmitter receptors, enzymes and scaffolds. The composition of these signal complexes is regulated by post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation and SUMOylation (SUMO is small ubiquitin-related modifier). In the present study, we searched for proteins interacting with the intracellular C-termini of the metabotropic glutamate receptors mGluR8a and mGluR8b and identified proteins of the SUMOylation and NEDDylation machinery. The SUMO E3 ligases Pias1 [Pias is protein inhibitor of activated STAT (signal transducer and activator of transcription)] and Pias3L interacted strongly with mGluR8b, and were co-localized with the E2-conjugating Ubc9, SUMO1 and mGluR8b in cell bodies present in the ganglion cell layer of the mammalian retina. SUMO1 conjugation of Lys882, present in a bona fide consensus sequence for SUMOylation (VKSE) in the mGluR8b C-terminus, was enhanced by addition of Pias1, consistent with an interaction between both proteins. Mutation of Lys882 to arginine reduced, but did not abolish, mGluR8b SUMOylation. Co-mutating a second lysine residue (Lys903) located in the mGluR8b isoform-specific C-terminus largely prevented SUMO1 conjugation by Ubc9. Modelling studies suggested that Lys903 contacts Ubc9 and thus is part of the non-canonical SUMOylation site VKSG. In summary, the results of the present study show in vivo SUMOylation of the complete mGluR8b and co-localize proteins of the SUMOylation machinery in the retina.

The orphan nuclear receptor LRH-1 (liver receptor homologue-1; NR5A2) plays a critical role in development, bile acid synthesis and cholesterol metabolism. LRH-1 is also expressed in the ovary where it is implicated in the regulation of steroidogenic genes for steroid hormone synthesis. In the present study, we investigated the molecular mechanisms of the transcriptional regulation of CYP11A1 by LRH-1 and found that LRH-1-mediated transactivation was markedly repressed by PIASy [protein inhibitor of activated STAT (signal transducer and activator of transcription) y], the shortest member of the PIAS family. The suppression of LRH-1 activity requires the N-terminal repression domain. Although PIAS proteins also function as E3 SUMO (small ubiquitin-related modifier) ligases and enhance SUMO conjugation, PIASy-mediated repression was independent of LRH-1 SUMOylation status. In addition, histone deacetylase activity was not involved in the inhibition of LRH-1 by PIASy. Immunoprecipitation and mammalian two-hybrid analyses indicated that PIASy interacted with LRH-1 through the C-terminal region, including the AF-2 (activation function-2) motif, which was also involved in the interaction between LRH-1 and the co-activator SRC-1 (steroid receptor co-activator-1). PIASy inhibited the binding of SRC-1 to LRH-1, although overexpression of SRC-1 partially overcame the PIASy inhibition of LRH-1 induction of the CYP11A1 promoter. The results of the present study suggest that competition with co-activators may be an important mechanism underlying the PIASy repression of LRH-1-mediated transactivation.

Transcriptional activity of signal-dependent transcription factors, including nuclear receptors, relies on interacting co-regulator proteins, many of which possess protein-modifying activity. SUMOs (small ubiquitin-related modifiers) and their conjugation pathway components act as co-regulator proteins for numerous transcription factors that also are often targets for SUMO modification. PIAS [protein inhibitor of activated STAT (signal transducer and activator of transcription)] proteins promote SUMOylation in a manner that resembles the action of RING-type ubiquitin E3 ligases. PIAS proteins were initially named for their ability to interact with STAT proteins and inhibit their activity, but their interactions and functions are not restricted to the STATs. Moreover, PIAS proteins do not operate merely as SUMO E3s, since their co-regulator effects are often independent of their RING finger but dependent on their SIM (SUMO-interacting motif) or SAP (scaffold attachment factor-A/B/acinus/PIAS) domain capable of interacting with DNA. The modulator activity imparted by the PIAS/SUMO system involves altered subnuclear targeting and/or assembly of transcription complexes. PIAS proteins may act as platforms that facilitate both removal and recruitment of other regulatory proteins in the transcription complexes.

The ETS-domain transcription factor Elk-1 is regulated by phosphorylation in response to activation of the MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) pathways. This phosphorylation triggers a series of molecular events that convert Elk-1 from a transcriptionally silent state into a highly active state and then back to a basal level. At the same time, activation of the ERK (extracellular-signal-regulated kinase) MAPK pathway leads to loss of modification of Elk-1 by SUMO (small ubiquitin-related modifier). As SUMO imparts repressive properties on Elk-1, ERK-mediated SUMO loss leads to de-repression at the same time as the ERK pathway promotes activation of Elk-1. Thus a two-step mechanism is employed to convert Elk-1 into its fully activated state. Here, the molecular events underlying these changes in Elk-1 status, and the role of PIASxα [protein inhibitor of activated STAT (signal transducer and activator of transcription) xα] as a co-activator that facilitates this process, are discussed.

Nuclear factor κB (NF-κB), p53 and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) proteins are transcription factors that are known to regulate cell fate in response to apoptotic stimuli. They may, therefore, represent components of drug responses that determine drug efficacy. This review will describe data illustrating some recent progress in our understanding of the mechanism of NF-κB activation after treatment of cells with DNA-damaging anti-cancer drugs. Furthermore, it will discuss how this and other transcriptional events, including STAT transcription factor activation, may effect the promotion or attenuation of apoptosis in target cells. In this regard, certain STAT family members may lie downstream of signalling pathways that are activated after DNA damage. Finally, it will be discussed how proteins normally linked with DNA damage signalling such as p53 may be regulated in response to physiological signals, revealing their role in developmental checkpoints such as differentiation commitment.

The commonly accepted model of STAT factor activation at the cytoplasmic part of the receptor assumes that signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs) are recruited from a cytoplasmic pool of monomeric STAT proteins. Based on a previous observation that non-phosphorylated STAT3-Src homology 2 domains dimerize in vitro, we investigated whether the observed dimerization is of physiological relevance within the cellular context. We show that STAT1 and STAT3 are pre-associated in non-stimulated cells. Apparently, these complexes are not able to translocate into the nucleus. We provide evidence that the event of STAT activation is more complex than previously assumed.