Search

Previous studies have suggested that fetal PRL secretion does not respond to stimuli such as TRH, metoclopramide, and cimetidine. It was postulated that the lack of response to TRH could be due to the possibility that, in the term fetus, lactotropes secrete PRL maximally and would be unresponsive to further stimulation. In order to study this hypothesis, 200 micrograms TRH or saline were administered to preterm pregnant women in labor. Maternal blood was obtained before TRH and saline administration. Maternal and cord blood were obtained at parturition. PRL, TSH, T4 and T3 concentrations were measured in all sera. TRH administration induced a significant increase in maternal serum PRL, TSH and T3 concentrations. In the cord blood of newborns whose mothers received TRH, serum TSH, T4 and T3 concentrations were significantly higher than in cord blood of newborns whose mothers received saline. Cord blood serum PRL concentrations were unchanged after TRH administration. This latter finding suggests that fetal lactotropes do not respond to TRH in the preterm fetus. Desensitization of fetal PRL secreting cells to TRH stimulation and/or the inhibitory effect of elevated fetal circulating corticosteroids on TRH-induced PRL secretion may explain the absent PRL response to TRH during fetal life.

Somatostatin (SRIF) was infused (500 micrograms over 30 min) into 68 pregnant women during labour. As a control, saline was infused into 26 pregnant women. Maternal blood was obtained prior to the infusion and at delivery and cord blood was obtained at delivery. The subjects were divided into 4 groups based upon the interval of time from the termination of SRIF infusion and delivery. There was a marked decrease in cord blood thyrotrophin (TSH) from 0 to 180 min and in cord blood growth hormone (GH) from 0 to 120 min following SRIF infusion. SRIF infusion did not affect cord blood iodothyronine and thyroglobulin concentrations. SRIF administration induced a small but significant (P less than 0.05) decrease in serum GH concentration but had no other effect on maternal hormone values. These studies strongly suggest that SRIF crosses the human placenta and transiently suppresses foetal anterior pituitary TSH and GH secretion.

The present study was undertaken in order to establish whether muscarinic cholinergic receptors are involved in the anomalous GH response to GnRH in men with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and in male patients with major depression. For this purpose, 16 male diabetics, 18 depressed men and 9 normal controls were tested with GnRH (25 micrograms iv) with and without previous treatment with the muscarinic cholinergic receptor blocker pirenzepine (40 mg iv 10 min before GnRH). Additional experiments with TRH (200 micrograms iv 10 min after pirenzepine) were performed in the same subjects and used for comparison between responders to TRH and GnRH. The administration of GnRH stimulated GH release in 12 out of the 16 diabetics and in 8 out of the 18 depressed patients, but not in the normal controls. Control and diabetic non-responders to GnRH did not respond to TRH. In contrast, all diabetic responders to GnRH, except 2, showed paradoxical GH responses to TRH. All depressed responders to GnRH and 3 of the non-responders, were responsive to TRH. The pattern and magnitude of the secretory responses to TRH and GnRH were similar in depressed and diabetic patients. When the effects of GnRH and TRH were restudied in the presence of pirenzepine, neither GnRH nor TRH enhanced the serum concentrations of GH in any patient. These data indicate that a muscarinic cholinergic mechanism is involved in the anomalous responses of GH to GnRH and TRH in diabetic men and in male patients affected by major depression.

In the adult, dopamine inhibits prolactin (Prl) secretion and less so thyrotropin (TSH) release. Little information is available concerning the role of dopaminergic stimuli in the regulation of TSH and Prl secretion in the term human foetus. The dopamine agonist, bromocriptine (5 mg), or placebo were randomly administered orally to 120 pregnant women during labour. Maternal and foetal cord blood was obtained at parturition and analyzed for Prl, TSH, T4, T3 and rT3 concentrations. Since the time of parturition is unpredictable, maternal and cord blood hormone values were grouped at intervals of time from the time of bromocriptine or placebo administration to delivery. Hormone values were compared between the bromocriptine and placebo groups by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Bromocriptine markedly inhibited maternal serum Prl concentrations compared to values in the placebo treated women (P less than 0.001) and this decrease was more marked as the time interval between bromocriptine administration and delivery increased (P less than 0.001, regression analysis). Cord blood Prl was also significantly lower in newborns whose mothers received bromocriptine (P less than 0.001). Bromocriptine significantly inhibited maternal serum TSH concentrations as compared to values in women treated with placebo (P less than 0.006). In contrast, bromocriptine administration did not affect cord blood TSH concentrations. These findings suggest that bromocriptine crosses the term human placenta and suppresses foetal Prl secretion. In contrast to the small inhibition of TSH secretion in pregnant women, bromocriptine does not affect foetal TSH secretion suggesting that regulation of TSH secretion in the term foetus may not be under dopaminergic control.