Search

FLT3 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy are the standard of care for newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, no head-to-head studies have established the superiority of one FLT3 inhibitor over another. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate overall survival (OS) among different FLT3 inhibitors. Three relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), involving 1.358 patients treated with midostaurin, quizartinib, and sorafenib, were included in our analysis. The hazard ratios (HRs) revealed no significant differences in OS between midostaurin and quizartinib (HR, 1.00; 95 % CI, 0.73-1.36), midostaurin and sorafenib (HR, 0.97; 95 % CI, 0.52-1.84), or quizartinib and sorafenib (HR, 0.97; 95 % CI, 0.51-1.85). This NMA, the first to explore this issue, found no OS differences among the different FLT3 inhibitors. In the absence of direct comparison trials, our findings provide practical insights for clinical decision-making., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Authors declare no competing financial interests, (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Achieving a BCR-ABL/ABL ratio <10% at 3 months has become an important goal of treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Several evidences showed that this early molecular response (EMR) is associated with positive long-term outcome in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival, but a consensus has not been reached when this goal is not achieved. European LeukemiaNet recommendations defined patients as treatment failure only after the 6- month time point. Not all patients that lack EMR have similar outcome and it became important to identify patients before this time point of 3 months. Several groups introduced the concept of "halving time" or "velocity of ratio reduction" that could anticipate the possibility to recognize patients deserving a switch to another treatment. Aim of this review is to summarize all evidences reported on the significance of EMR and how this evaluation changed our perspectives and modified our therapeutic strategies., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) advent has deeply changed the outcome of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, with improved rates of response and overall survival. However, for this success some patients paid the price of a number of peculiar side effects, the so-called off-target side effects, specific for each one TKI. These effects are due to non-selective inhibition of other tyrosine kinase receptors, such as PDGFR, c-KIT, Src, VEGF. Consequences of this inhibition, some metabolic changes during the treatment with TKIs are reported. Aim of present review is to report metabolic changes and potential mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis related to imatinib, second (nilotinib and dasatinib) and third generation (bosutinib and ponatinib) TKIs., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

We applied Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) stratification on a large cohort of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) very elderly patients (>75 years) treated with imatinib, in order to observe the impact of concomitant diseases on both compliance and outcome. One hundred and eighty-one patients were recruited by 21 Italian centers. There were 95 males and 86 females, median age 78.6 years (range 75-93.6). According to Sokal score, 106 patients were classified as intermediate risk and 55 as high risk (not available in 20 patients). According to CCI stratification, 71 patients had score 0 and 110 a score ≥ 1. Imatinib standard dose was reduced at start of therapy (200-300 mg/day) in 68 patients independently from the evaluation of baseline comorbidities, but based only on physician judgement: 43.6% of these patients had score 0 compared to 34% of patients who had score ≥ 1. Significant differences were found in terms of subsequent dose reduction (39% of patients with score 0 compared to 53% of patients with score ≥ 1) and in terms of drug discontinuation due to toxicity (35% of patients with score 0 vs 65% of patients with score ≥ 1). We did not find significant differences as regards occurrence of hematologic side effects, probably as a consequence of the initial dose reduction: 39% of patients with score 0 experienced grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity (most commonly anemia) compared to 42% of patients with score ≥ 1. Independently from the initial dose, comorbidities again did not have an impact on development of grade 3/4 non-hematologic side effects (most commonly skin rash, muscle cramps and fluid retention): 62% of patients with score 0 compared to 52.5% of patients with score ≥ 1. Notwithstanding the reduced dose and the weight of comorbidities we did not find significant differences but only a trend in terms of efficacy: 66% of patients with score 0 achieved a CCyR compared to 54% of patients with score ≥ 1. Comorbidities appeared to have an impact on median OS (40.8 months for patients with score 0 vs 20.16 months for patients with score ≥ 1) on EFS and on non-CML death rate. Our results suggest that treatment of very elderly CML patients might be influenced by personal physician perception: evaluation at baseline of comorbidities according to CCI should improve initial decision-making in this subset of patients., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Although vitamin D insufficiency is related to inferior prognosis in some cancers, limited data exist in hematologic malignancies. We evaluated the relationship between 25(OH)D serum levels and time to first treatment (TFT), a disease-specific end point, in 130 previously untreated Binet stage A chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. Measurement of 25(OH)D was performed by means of a direct, competitive chemiluminescence immunoassay using the DiaSorin LIAISON 25(OH)D TOTAL assay (DiaSorin, Inc., Stillwater, Minnesota). Overall, 41 patients (31.5%) had severe vitamin D insufficiency (<10 ng/mL), 66 (50.7%) had mild to moderate insufficiency (10-24 ng/mL), and 23 (17.6%) had 25(OH)D levels within the optimal range (25-80 ng/mL), with no relationship with between the season of sample collection and 25(OH)D level (P=0.188). A patient stratification according to these 3 groups led to significant difference in terms of TFT, with vitamin D insufficient patients having the shortest TFT (P=0.02). With respect to continuous 25(OH)D levels and clinical outcome, TFT was shorter as 25(OH)D decreased until a value of 13.5 ng/mL at which point the association of 25(OH)D and TFT remained constant. As a matter of fact, the 25(OH)D value of 13.5 ng/mL identified two patients subsets with different TFT risk (HR=1.91; 95% CI=1.06-3.44; P=0.03). In multivariate analysis the variable entering the model at a significant level were mutational status of IgVH (P<0.0001), serum thymidine kinase (P=0.02) and absolute lymphocyte count (P=0.03). Thus confirming the Mayo clinic experience, our data provide further evidence that 25(OH)D levels may be an important host factor influencing TFT of Binet stage A patients. Whether normalizing vitamin D levels may delay disease-progression of patients with early disease will require testing in future trials., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

We wondered whether there was any association between the extent of increased angiogenesis and IgV(H) gene mutational status, expression of CD38 and ZAP-70 in early B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. Circulating levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) correlated positively with ZAP-70-expression (P=0.03), CD38- expression (P=0.03) and mutational status of IgV(H) (P=0.005). The same did not apply when correlations were sought with either bone marrow angiogenesis or serum levels of basic fibroblatic growth factor (FGF-2). Studies to determine how to integrate variables reflecting increased angiogenesis with other prognostic markers such as CD38, ZAP-70, IgV(H) status and cytogenetic abnormalities are needed to optimize risk stratification for individual patients.