Search

Thirty university students were shown tachistoscopically presented stimuli (half contained an open circle at one of six locations, half were blanks) at four durations. Short durations and a pattern mask reduced subjects' ability to detect the stimuli. For trials on which the subjects reported that the circle was absent, they nevertheless guessed the exact locations of the targets significantly better than chance. A signal detection theory analysis found that subjects were more sensitive for the location decision than for the detection decision. These findings show that the blindsight phenomenon of localization of "unseen" stimuli, previously reported for cortically blind patients, also occurs for humans with normal vision.

Asymmetry in the opening of the two sides of the mouth during speech has been suggested as an observable correlate of lateralization of cerebral speech motor control. For 24 epileptic patients who suffered speech disturbance only during left hemisphere carotid amytal anesthetization, 22 showed the expected greater opening of the right side of the mouth during a repetition task. However, all four of the patients who suffered speech disturbance following only right hemisphere anesthetization, and 8 of the 11 "bilateral speech" patients, also showed greater opening of the right side of the mouth. The speech dominant patients may, however, have genetic left speech dominance but a pathology-forced shift of some components of language to the right hemisphere. Basic mouth asymmetry, as measured here, may primarily reflect lateralization of a component of the motor/speech/language control system that may not be shifted by pathology in epileptic patients sustaining early brain insult. Relative change in mouth asymmetry as the speech task becomes more demanding may, however, be a more sensitive indicator or cerebral asymmetries for language in pathological cases.

Interhemispheric transfer was assessed by five motor, tactile and visual tasks which required the 48 subjects to compare stimuli presented simultaneously on both sides of the body midline. Non-right-handers performed significantly better than consistent right-handers on one motor and one tactile task. Females out-performed males on the visual task and on one tactile task. Better interhemispheric transfer performance by non-right-handers and by females may be related to the reportedly larger corpus callosum regions in these groups and also to the reportedly less strong lateralization of function.

A new dichotic listening technique, based on a psychophysical threshold procedure and providing ordinal scale measurement of lateral asymmetry, was used to investigate variation in the size of right-ear advantage for verbal vs manual response modalities across three semantic categories of stimuli in 60 right-handed males. For manual responders, abstract words elicited a significantly greater right-ear advantage than did concrete words, while emotional words elicited a non-significant left-ear advantage. Verbal responders showed no significant difference in the size of right-ear advantage across stimuli. The results suggest that both response modality and stimulus type are important variables for dichotic listening paradigms seeking evidence of right hemisphere contributions to semantic processing.