Search

In recent years, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have uncovered a large number of susceptibility variants. Nevertheless, GWAS findings provide only tentative evidence of association, and replication studies are required to establish their validity. Due to this uncertainty, researchers often focus on top-ranking SNPs, instead of considering strict significance thresholds to guide replication efforts. The number of SNPs for replication is often determined ad hoc. We show how the rank-based approach can be used for sample size allocation in GWAS as well as for deciding on a number of SNPs for replication. The basis of this approach is the "ranking probability": chances that at least j true associations will rank among top u SNPs, when SNPs are sorted by P-value. By employing simple but accurate approximations for ranking probabilities, we accommodate linkage disequilibrium (LD) and evaluate consequences of ignoring LD. Further, we relate ranking probabilities to the proportion of false discoveries among top u SNPs. A study-specific proportion can be estimated from P-values, and its expected value can be predicted for study design applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The correlation between alleles at a pair of genetic loci is a measure of linkage disequilibrium. The square of the sample correlation multiplied by sample size provides the usual test statistic for the hypothesis of no disequilibrium for loci with two alleles and this relation has proved useful for study design and marker selection. Nevertheless, this relation holds only in a diallelic case, and an extension to multiple alleles has not been made. Here we introduce a similar statistic, R², which leads to a correlation-based test for loci with multiple alleles: for a pair of loci with k and m alleles, and a sample of n individuals, the approximate distribution of n(k- 1) (m-1)/(km)R² under independence between loci is X²(k-1)(m-1). One advantage of this statistic is thatitcan he interpreted as the total correlation between a pair of loci. When the phase of two-locus genotypes is known, the approach is equivalent to a test for the overall correlation between rows and columns in a contingency table. In the phase-known case, R² is the sum of the squared sample correlations for all km 2 X 2 subtables formed by collapsing to one allele vs. the rest at each locus. We examine the approximate distribution under the null of independence for R² and report its close agreement with the exact distribution obtained by permutation. The test for independence using R² is a strong competitor to approaches such as Pearson's chi square, Fisher's exact test, and a test based on Cressie and Read's power divergence statistic. We combine this approach with our previous composite-disequilibrium measures to address the case when the genotypic phase is unknown. Calculation of the new multiallele test statistic and its P-value is very simple and utilizes the approximate distribution of R². We provide a computer program that evaluates approximate as well as "exact" permutational P-values. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With the recent advances in high-throughput genotyping techniques, it is now possible to perform whole-genorne association studies to fine map causal polymorphisms underlying important traits that influence susceptibility to human diseases and efficacy of drugs. Once a genome scan is completed the results can be sorted by the association statistic value. What is the probability that true positives will l)e encountered among the first most associated markers? When a particular polymorphism is found associated with the trait, there is a chance that it represents either a "true" or a "false" association (TA vs. FA). Setting appropriate significance thresholds has been considered to provide assurance of sufficient odds that the associations found to be significant are genuine. However, the problem with genome scans involving thousands of markers is that the statistic values of FAs can reach quite extreme magnitudes. In such situations, the distributions corresponding to TAs and the most extreme FAs become comparable and significance thresholds tend to penalize TM and FM in a similar fashion. When sorting between true and false associations, the "typical" place (i.e., rank) of TAs among the most significant outcomes becomes important, ordered by the association statistic value. The distribution of ranks that we study here allows calculation of several useful quantities. In particular, it gives the number of most significant markers needed for a follow-up study to guarantee that a true association is included with certain probability. This can be calculated conditionally on having applied a multiple-testing correction. Effects of multilocus (e.g., haplotype association) tests and impact of linkage disequilibrium on the distribution of ranks associated with TM are evaluated and can be taken into account. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There has been much recent interest in describing the patterns of linkage disequilibrium (LD) along a chromosome. Most empirical studies that have examined this issue have concentrated on LD between collections of pairs of markers and have not considered the joint effect of a group of markers beyond these pairwise connections. Here, we examine many different patterns of LD defined by both pairwise and joint multilocus LD terms. The LD patterns we considered were chosen in part by examining those seen in real data. We examine how changes in these patterns affect the power to detect association when performing single- marker and haplotype-based case-control tests, including a novel haplotype test based on contrasting LD between affected and unaffected individuals. Through our studies we find that differences in power between single-marker tests and haplotype-based tests in general do not appear to be large. Where moderate to high levels of multilocus LD exist, haplotype tests tend to be more powerful. Single-marker tests tend to prevail when pairwise LD is high. For moderate pairwise values and weak multilocus LD, either testing strategy may come out ahead, although it is also quite likely that neither has much power. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]