Search

Objective: To determine the effects of using unstructured clinical text in machine learning (ML) for prediction, early detection, and identification of sepsis.Materials and Methods: PubMed, Scopus, ACM DL, dblp, and IEEE Xplore databases were searched. Articles utilizing clinical text for ML or natural language processing (NLP) to detect, identify, recognize, diagnose, or predict the onset, development, progress, or prognosis of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock were included. Sepsis definition, dataset, types of data, ML models, NLP techniques, and evaluation metrics were extracted.Results: The clinical text used in models include narrative notes written by nurses, physicians, and specialists in varying situations. This is often combined with common structured data such as demographics, vital signs, laboratory data, and medications. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) comparison of ML methods showed that utilizing both text and structured data predicts sepsis earlier and more accurately than structured data alone. No meta-analysis was performed because of incomparable measurements among the 9 included studies.Discussion: Studies focused on sepsis identification or early detection before onset; no studies used patient histories beyond the current episode of care to predict sepsis. Sepsis definition affects reporting methods, outcomes, and results. Many methods rely on continuous vital sign measurements in intensive care, making them not easily transferable to general ward units.Conclusions: Approaches were heterogeneous, but studies showed that utilizing both unstructured text and structured data in ML can improve identification and early detection of sepsis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Oncologist is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Summary Large scale genomic studies produce millions of sequence variants, generating datasets far too massive for manual inspection. To ensure variant and genotype data are consistent and accurate, it is necessary to evaluate variants prior to downstream analysis using quality control (QC) reports. Variant call format (VCF) files are the standard format for representing variant data; however, generating summary statistics from these files is not always straightforward. While tools to summarize variant data exist, they generally produce simple text file tables, which still require additional processing and interpretation. VariantQC fills this gap as a user friendly, interactive visual QC report that generates and concisely summarizes statistics from VCF files. The report aggregates and summarizes variants by dataset, chromosome, sample and filter type. The VariantQC report is useful for high-level dataset summary, quality control and helps flag outliers. Furthermore, VariantQC operates on VCF files, so it can be easily integrated into many existing variant pipelines. Availability and implementation DISCVRSeq's VariantQC tool is freely available as a Java program, with the compiled JAR and source code available from https://github.com/BimberLab/DISCVRSeq/. Documentation and example reports are available at https://bimberlab.github.io/DISCVRSeq/. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]