Search

Aims Myocardial perfusion imaging with 82-rubidium positron emission tomography (82Rb-PET) is increasingly used to assess stable coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of 82Rb-PET-derived parameters in patients with symptoms suggestive of CAD but no significant reversible or irreversible perfusion defects. Methods and results Among 3726 consecutive patients suspected of stable CAD who underwent 82Rb-PET between January 2018 and August 2020, 2175 had no regional perfusion defects. Among these patients, we studied the association of 82Rb-PET-derived parameters with a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for unstable angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or ischaemic stroke. During a median follow up of 1.7 years (interquartile range 1.1–2.5 years), there were 148 endpoints. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) reserve (MFR), MBF during stress, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), LVEF-reserve, heart rate reserve, and Ca score were associated with adverse outcomes. In multivariable Cox model adjusted for patient and 82Rb-PET characteristics, MFR < 2 (hazard ratio (HR) 1.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24–2.48), LVEF (HR 1.38 per 10% decrease, 95% CI 1.24–1.54), and LVEF-reserve (HR 1.19 per 5% decrease, 95% CI 1.07–1.31) were significant predictors of endpoints. Results were consistent in subgroups defined by gender, history of ischaemic heart disease, low LVEF, and atrial fibrillation. Conclusion MFR, LVEF, and LVEF-reserve derived from 82Rb-PET provide prognostic information on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with no perfusion defects. This may aid in identifying patients at risk and might provide an opportunity for preventive interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the effect of a conventional to an intensive blood pressure monitoring regimen on blood pressure in hypertensive patients in the general practice setting.Design: Randomized controlled parallel group trial with 12-month follow-up.Setting: One hundred and ten general practices in all regions of Denmark.Participants: One thousand forty-eight patients with essential hypertension.Intervention: Conventional blood pressure monitoring ('usual group') continued usual ad hoc blood pressure monitoring by office blood pressure measurements, while intensive blood pressure monitoring ('intensive group') supplemented this with frequent home blood pressure monitoring and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.Primary outcome measures: Mean day- and night-time systolic and diastolic 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure.Secondary outcome measures: Change in systolic and diastolic office blood pressure and change in cardiovascular risk profile.Results: Of the patients, 515 (49%) were allocated to the usual group, and 533 (51%) to the intensive group. The reductions in day- and night-time 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure were similar (usual group: 4.6 ± 13.5/2.8 ± 82 mmHg; intensive group: 5.6 ± 13.0/3.5 ± 8.2 mmHg; P = 0.27/P = 0.20). Cardiovascular risk scores were reduced in both groups at follow-up, but more so in the intensive than in the usual group (P = 0.02).Conclusion: An intensive blood pressure monitoring strategy led to a similar blood pressure reduction to conventional monitoring. However, the intensive strategy appeared to improve patients' cardiovascular risk profile through other effects than a reduction of blood pressure.Trial registration: Clinical Trials NCT00244660. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Elevated plasma N-terminal (NT)-proBNP levels and coronary calcium score (CCS) not only predicts myocardial ischaemia and coronary artery stenosis but also adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in type 2 diabetic patients with an increased urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER), whereas low levels are associated with low frequency of coronary artery disease (CAD) and good prognosis. The underlying causes of poor prognosis in patients with elevated NT-proBNP are not known; thus, we investigated the role of putative asymptomatic CAD in type 2 diabetic patients with UAER >30 mg/24 h and elevated P-NT-proBNP and/or CCS. Methods: We identified 200 type 2 diabetic patients without known CAD and with normal creatinine levels. Patients with P-NT-proBNP >45.2 ng/L (the median P-NT-proBNP value in this cohort and in accordance with our previous findings) and/or CCS ≥ 400 were stratified as high-risk patients for CAD (n = 133) and all other patients as low-risk patients (n = 67). High-risk patients were examined by myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI; n = 109) and/or computer tomography angiography (n = 20) and/or coronary angiography (CAG; n = 86). Results: All patients received intensive mulitifactorial intervention. In 70 of 133 (53%) high-risk patients, significant CAD was demonstrated by MPI and/or CAG, corresponding to 35% (70/200) of the total cohort. Among high-risk patients, CCS but not P-NT-proBNP was paralleled by increased prevalence of significant CAD and in the 86 patients where CAG was performed, a CCS <100 had a negative predictive value for coronary artery stenosis of 94% (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Our study revealed that >50% of asymptomatic type 2 diabetic patients with UAER >30 mg/24 h had significant CAD based on risk stratification with P-NT-proBNP and CCS. This provides some explanation to the previously reported poor prognosis in these asymptomatic patients. Optimized cardio protective treatment in these patients is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]