Search

Objectives: To study the in vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam and comparators and the imipenem/relebactam resistance mechanisms in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa collection from Portugal (STEP, 2017-18) and Spain (SUPERIOR, 2016-17) surveillance studies.Methods: P. aeruginosa isolates (n = 474) were prospectively recovered from complicated urinary tract (cUTI), complicated intra-abdominal (cIAI) and lower respiratory tract (LRTI) infections in 11 Portuguese and 8 Spanish ICUs. MICs were determined (ISO broth microdilution). All imipenem/relebactam-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates (n = 30) and a subset of imipenem/relebactam-susceptible strains (n = 32) were characterized by WGS.Results: Imipenem/relebactam (93.7% susceptible), ceftazidime/avibactam (93.5% susceptible) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (93.2% susceptible) displayed comparable activity. The imipenem/relebactam resistance rate was 6.3% (Portugal 5.8%; Spain 8.9%). Relebactam restored imipenem susceptibility to 76.9% (103/134) of imipenem-resistant isolates, including MDR (82.1%; 32/39), XDR (68.8%; 53/77) and difficult-to-treat (DTR) isolates (67.2%; 45/67). Among sequenced strains, differences in population structure were detected depending on the country: clonal complex (CC)175 and CC309 in Spain and CC235, CC244, CC348 and CC253 in Portugal. Different carbapenemase gene distributions were also found: VIM-20 (n = 3), VIM-1 (n = 2), VIM-2 (n = 1) and VIM-36 (n = 1) in Spain and GES-13 (n = 13), VIM-2 (n = 3) and KPC-3 (n = 2) in Portugal. GES-13-CC235 (n = 13) and VIM type-CC175 (n = 5) associations were predominant in Portugal and Spain, respectively. Imipenem/relebactam showed activity against KPC-3 strains (2/2), but was inactive against all GES-13 producers and most of the VIM producers (8/10). Mutations in genes affecting porin inactivation, efflux pump overexpression and LPS modification might also be involved in imipenem/relebactam resistance.Conclusions: Microbiological results reinforce imipenem/relebactam as a potential option to treat cUTI, cIAI and LRTI caused by MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa isolates, except for GES-13 and VIM producers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To analyse the epidemiology, the resistome and the virulome of ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible or -resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates recovered from surveillance studies in Portugal (STEP, 2017-18) and Spain (SUPERIOR, 2016-17).Methods: P. aeruginosa isolates were recovered from intra-abdominal, urinary tract and lower respiratory tract infections in ICU patients admitted to 11 Portuguese and 8 Spanish hospitals. MICs were determined (ISO-standard broth microdilution, EUCAST 2020 breakpoints). A subset of 28 ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates were analysed and compared with 28 ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible P. aeruginosa strains by WGS.Results: Clonal complex (CC) 235 (27%) and CC175 (18%) were the most frequent, followed by CC244 (13%), CC348 (9%), CC253 (5%) and CC309 (5%). Inter-hospital clonal dissemination was observed, limited to a geographical region (CC235, CC244, CC348 and CC253 in Portugal and CC175 and CC309 in Spain). Carbapenemases were detected in 25 isolates (45%): GES-13 (13/25); VIM type (10/25) [VIM-2 (4/10), VIM-20 (3/10), VIM-1 (2/10) and VIM-36 (1/10)]; and KPC-3 (2/25). GES-13-CC235 (13/15) and VIM type-CC175 (5/10) associations were observed. Interestingly, KPC-3 and VIM-36 producers showed ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible phenotypes. However, ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance was significantly associated with GES-13 and VIM-type carbapenemase production. Six non-carbapenemase producers also displayed ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance, three of them showing known ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance-associated mutations in the PBP3 gene, ftsI (R504C and F533L). Overall, an extensive virulome was identified in all P. aeruginosa isolates, particularly in carbapenemase-producing strains.Conclusions: GES-13-CC235 and VIM type-CC175 were the most frequent MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa clones causing infections in Portuguese and Spanish ICU patients, respectively. Ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance was mainly due to carbapenemase production, although mutations in PBP-encoding genes may additionally be involved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin, developed for activity against MDR Gram-negative bacilli (MDR-GNB).Objectives: To assess the in vitro antibacterial activity of cefiderocol against a collection of MDR-GNB clinical isolates from hospitals in southern Spain.Methods: Two hundred and thirty-one isolates of successful clones were tested: 125 Enterobacterales (121 ESBL- and/or carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and 4 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacter cloacae), 80 Acinetobacter baumannii, 6 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 20 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam, cefepime, aztreonam, meropenem, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, colistin and tigecycline were used as comparators against Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii. Minocycline, levofloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were studied against S. maltophilia instead of aztreonam, ciprofloxacin and cefepime. MICs were determined by broth microdilution according to CLSI guidelines. MIC determination was performed in CAMHB for all antimicrobials except cefiderocol, where iron-depleted CAMHB was used.Results: Cefiderocol showed potent in vitro activity against the isolates analysed. MIC50 and MIC90 values were in the ranges 0.125-8 mg/L and 0.5-8 mg/L, respectively, and 98% of isolates were inhibited at ≤4 mg/L. Only five isolates showed cefiderocol MICs of >4 mg/L: three ST2/OXA-24/40-producing A. baumannii, one ST114/VIM-1-producing E. cloacae and one ST114/VIM-1 + OXA-48-producing E. cloacae. All KPC-3-producing K. pneumoniae were susceptible to cefiderocol, even those resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam. P. aeruginosa isolates showed cefiderocol MICs of <4 mg/L, including those resistant to ceftolozane/tazobactam. S. maltophilia isolates displayed cefiderocol MICs of <4 mg/L, including those resistant to levofloxacin and/or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.Conclusions: Cefiderocol showed excellent activity against MDR-GNB, including carbapenem-resistant isolates, and was the most active antimicrobial tested against this collection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background More data are needed about the safety of antibiotic de-escalation in specific clinical situations as a strategy to reduce exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics. The aims of this study were to investigate predictors of de-escalation and its impact on the outcome of patients with bloodstream infection due to Enterobacteriaceae (BSI-E). Methods A post hoc analysis was performed on a prospective, multicenter cohort of patients with BSI-E initially treated with ertapenem or antipseudomonal β-lactams. Logistic regression was used to analyze factors associated with early de-escalation (EDE) and Cox regression for the impact of EDE and late de-escalation (LDE) on 30-day all-cause mortality. A propensity score (PS) for EDE vs no de-escalation (NDE) was calculated. Failure at end of treatment and length of hospital stay were also analyzed. Results Overall, 516 patients were included. EDE was performed in 241 patients (46%), LDE in 95 (18%), and NDE in 180 (35%). Variables independently associated with a lower probability of EDE were multidrug-resistant isolates (odds ratio [OR], 0.50 [95% confidence interval {CI},.30–.83]) and nosocomial infection empirically treated with imipenem or meropenem (OR, 0.35 [95% CI,.14–.87]). After controlling for confounders, EDE was not associated with increased risk of mortality; hazard ratios (HR) (95% CIs) were as follows: general model, 0.58 (.25–1.31); model with PS, 0.69 (.29–1.65); and PS-based matched pairs, 0.98 (.76–1.26). LDE was not associated with mortality. De-escalation was not associated with clinical failure or length of hospital stay. Conclusions De-escalation in patients with monomicrobial bacteremia due to Enterobacteriaceae was not associated with a detrimental impact on clinical outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To compare results of amoxicillin/clavulanate susceptibility testing using CLSI and EUCAST methodologies and to evaluate their impact on outcome in patients with bacteraemia caused by Enterobacteriaceae.Patients and methods: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted in 13 Spanish hospitals. Patients with bacteraemia due to Enterobacteriaceae who received empirical intravenous amoxicillin/clavulanate treatment for at least 48 h were included. MICs were determined following CLSI and EUCAST recommendations. Outcome variables were: failure at the end of treatment with amoxicillin/clavulanate (FEAMC); failure at day 21; and 30 day mortality. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis and logistic regression were performed.Results: Overall, 264 episodes were included; the urinary tract was the most common source (64.7%) and Escherichia coli the most frequent pathogen (76.5%). Fifty-two isolates (19.7%) showed resistance according to CLSI and 141 (53.4%) according to EUCAST. The kappa index for the concordance between the results of both committees was only 0.24. EUCAST-derived, but not CLSI-derived, MICs were associated with failure when considered as continuous variables. CART analysis suggested a 'resistance' breakpoint of > 8/4 mg/L for CLSI-derived MICs; it predicted FEAMC in adjusted analysis (OR = 1.96; 95% CI: 0.98-3.90). Isolates with EUCAST-derived MICs >16/2 mg/L independently predicted FEAMC (OR = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.05-4.21) and failure at day 21 (OR= 3.01; 95% CI: 0.93-9.67). MICs >32/2 mg/L were only predictive of failure among patients with bacteraemia from urinary or biliary tract sources.Conclusions: CLSI and EUCAST methodologies showed low agreement for determining the MIC of amoxicillin/clavulanate. EUCAST-derived MICs seemed more predictive of failure than CLSI-derived ones. EUCAST-derived MICs >16/2 mg/L were independently associated with therapeutic failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the impact of low versus borderline MIC of piperacillin/tazobactam on the clinical outcomes of patients with bacteraemia caused by Enterobacteriaceae who were treated with that antimicrobial. Patients and methods: A prospective observational multicentre cohort study was conducted in 13 Spanish university hospitals. Patients >17 years old with bacteraemia due to Enterobacteriaceae who received empirical piperacillin/tazobactam treatment for at least 48 h were included. Outcome variables were clinical response at day 21, clinical response at end of treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam and all-cause 30 day mortality. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: Overall, 275 patients were included in the analysis; 248 (90.2%) in the low MIC group (≤4 mg/L) and 27 (9.8%) in the borderline MIC group (8-16 mg/L). The biliary tract was the most common source of infection (48.4%) and Escherichia coli was the most frequent pathogen (63.3%). Crude 30 day mortality rates were 10.5% and 11.1% for the low MIC group and the borderline MIC group, respectively (relative risk = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.34-3.27, P = 1). Multivariate analysis of failure at day 21 and at end of treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam and 30 day mortality showed no trend towards increased clinical failure or mortality with borderline MICs (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.18-4.88, P = 0.96; OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.10-2.26, P = 0.35; OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 0.33-6.68, P = 0.6). Conclusions: We did not find that higher piperacillin/tazobactam MICwithin the susceptible or intermediate susceptibility range had a significant influence on the outcome for patients with bacteraemia due to Enterobacteriaceae. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]