1. Studies of the symptom abdominal pain—a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Viniol, Annika, Keunecke, Christian, Biroga, Tobias, Stadje, Rebekka, Dornieden, Katharina, Bösner, Stefan, Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert, Haasenritter, Jörg, and Becker, Annette
- Subjects
- *
DIAGNOSIS of abdominal pain , *ABDOMINAL pain , *SYSTEMATIC reviews , *META-analysis , *PRIMARY care , *DECISION making , *DISEASE prevalence , *PATIENTS - Abstract
Background. Diagnostic reasoning in primary care patients with abdominal pain is a complex challenge for GPs. To ensure evidence-based decision making for this symptom, GPs need setting-specific knowledge about the prevalence, potential risks for diseases and chance of recovery or risk of undesirable courses of disease. Aim. We conducted a systematic review of symptom-evaluating studies on prevalence, aetiology or prognosis of abdominal pain. Methods. We included all studies evaluating the symptom ‘abdominal pain’ as a reason for consultation in primary care. We included all types of study designs except for qualitative studies. Studies focussed solely on children or settings other than primary care were also excluded. Results. We identified 14 studies. Mean consultation prevalence is 2.8% for abdominal pain. In about one-third of patients the underlying cause of abdominal pain cannot be specified. The most common aetiologies are gastroenteritis (7.2–18.7%), irritable bowel disease (2.6–13.2%), urological cause (5.3%) and gastritis (5.2%). About 1 in 10 abdominal pain patients suffers from an acute disease like appendicitis (1.9%), diverticulitis (3.0%), biliary/pancreatic (4.0%) or neoplastic (1.0%) diseases needing immediate therapy. Conclusion. There is a high prevalence of patients consulting GPs for abdominal pain. The review identified a comparably high rate of acute underlying diseases in need of further investigation or therapy. At the same time, the underlying cause of the complaints often remains unexplained. Further symptom-evaluating studies are necessary, ideally using standardized methodology in order to gain sufficient evidence for developing much-needed guidelines and decision support tools. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF