Search

Objective: The study sought to test a patient and family online reporting system for perceived ambulatory visit note inaccuracies.Materials and Methods: We implemented a patient and family electronic reporting system at 3 U.S. healthcare centers: a northeast urban academic adult medical center (AD), a northeast urban academic pediatric medical center (PED), and a southeast nonprofit hospital network (NET). Patients and families reported potential documentation inaccuracies after reading primary care and subspecialty visit notes. Results were characterized using descriptive statistics and coded for clinical relevance.Results: We received 1440 patient and family reports (780 AD, 402 PED, and 258 NET), and 27% of the reports identified a potential inaccuracy (25% AD, 35% PED, 28% NET). Among these, patients and families indicated that the potential inaccuracy was important or very important in 58% of reports (55% AD, 55% PED, 71% NET). The most common types of potential inaccuracies included description of symptoms (21%), past medical problems (21%), medications (18%), and important information that was missing (15%). Most patient- and family-reported inaccuracies resulted in a change to care or to the medical record (55% AD, 67% PED, data not available at NET).Discussion: About one-quarter of patients and families using an online reporting system identified potential documentation inaccuracies in visit notes and more than half were considered important by patients and clinicians, underscoring the potential role of patients and families as ambulatory safety partners.Conclusions: Partnering with patients and families to obtain reports on inaccuracies in visit notes may contribute to safer care. Mechanisms to encourage greater use of patient and family reporting systems are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The severity of the 2017–2018 influenza season in the United States was high, with influenza A(H3N2) viruses predominating. Here, we report influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) and estimate the number of vaccine-prevented influenza-associated illnesses, medical visits, hospitalizations, and deaths for the 2017–2018 influenza season. Methods We used national age-specific estimates of 2017–2018 influenza vaccine coverage and disease burden. We estimated VE against medically attended reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction–confirmed influenza virus infection in the ambulatory setting using a test-negative design. We used a compartmental model to estimate numbers of influenza-associated outcomes prevented by vaccination. Results The VE against outpatient, medically attended, laboratory-confirmed influenza was 38% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31%–43%), including 22% (95% CI, 12%–31%) against influenza A(H3N2), 62% (95% CI, 50%–71%) against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, and 50% (95% CI, 41%–57%) against influenza B. We estimated that influenza vaccination prevented 7.1 million (95% CrI, 5.4 million–9.3 million) illnesses, 3.7 million (95% CrI, 2.8 million–4.9 million) medical visits, 109 000 (95% CrI, 39 000–231 000) hospitalizations, and 8000 (95% credible interval [CrI], 1100–21 000) deaths. Vaccination prevented 10% of expected hospitalizations overall and 41% among young children (6 months–4 years). Conclusions Despite 38% VE, influenza vaccination reduced a substantial burden of influenza-associated illness, medical visits, hospitalizations, and deaths in the United States during the 2017–2018 season. Our results demonstrate the benefit of current influenza vaccination and the need for improved vaccines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) prescribing has increased along with the trend toward early discharge of hospitalized patients who have infections. There is limited literature that assesses unplanned hospitalizations during OPAT. This study aims to elucidate the predictors of unplanned hospitalization in OPAT patients after discharge from acute-care facilities within Carolinas HealthCare System (CHS). Understanding these predictors may inform future interventions to improve treatment efficacy and patient outcomes. Methods. The study cohort included hospitalized patients aged >19 years who initiated OPAT in an acute-care facility within CHS in 2014-2015. Patients who had OPAT prescribed at an ambulatory-care facility were excluded. The primary outcome was unplanned hospitalization anytime during the at-risk time from discharge through 90 days. Results. The unplanned hospitalization rate for the cohort was 18.5%. In adjusted analysis, having OPAT delivered at a skilled nursing facility was associated with a 46% (incident risk ratio = 1.46; 95% confidence interval = 1.04-2.06) increased risk of an unplanned hospitalization compared with patients receiving OPAT at home after adjustment for demographics, comorbidities, indication, treatment duration, and antimicrobial prescribed. Infusion, dialysis, and rehabilitation centers had the lowest rates of unplanned hospitalizations. Conclusions. These results suggest that the location of OPAT delivery is associated with unplanned hospitalizations and that older patients need additional support during OPAT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background At least 30% of antibiotics prescribed in the ambulatory setting are unnecessary, including high rates of overuse for acute respiratory infections (ARI). We designed and evaluated whether a multifaceted outpatient stewardship program leveraging multidisciplinary stakeholder engagement, education tools, and an innovative prescribing dashboard decreased antibiotic prescribing in ARI. Methods In November 2017, the Carolinas HealthCare Outpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship Empowerment Network (CHOSEN) launched an antibiotic awareness campaign in over 150 ambulatory practices in the Charlotte metropolitan area, reaching over one million patients. The campaign included online and in-person tools for patients and providers, targeted education at meetings, and social and mass media exposure. In March 2018, a provider level prescribing dashboard was introduced to target inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in ARI (acute sinusitis, nonsuppurative otitis media, nonbacterial pharyngitis, URI, cough, allergy, and influenza). Data were collected for family medicine (FM), internal medicine (IM), urgent care (UC) and pediatric medicine (PM); 10% and 20% relative reduction targets (years 2019 and 2020, respectively) were set for each service line. We compared pre (April 2016–March 2018) vs. post (April 2018–March 2019) intervention prescribing rates (calculated as the number of encounters with antibiotics vs. total) as rate ratios and used segmented regression models to assess change over time. Results There were 1,001,335 pre and 448,390 post-intervention encounters. Postintervention prescribing rates (antibiotics per 100 encounters) decreased for all service lines, FM (49.4 to 39.3), IM (49.7 to 41.2), UC (49.8 to 44.4), and PM (40.6 to 36.1) vs. pre-intervention (all rate ratios, P ≤ 0.01). All service lines met the target 2019 10% reduction goals. Post-implementation, FM and IM showed immediate decreases in prescribing (figure). After an initial increase, UC showed a significant month-to-month decrease (figure). Conclusion Integration of a prescribing dashboard within a multifaceted antibiotic awareness campaign reduced inappropriate outpatient antibiotic prescribing for ARI and achieved interim targets consistent with 2020 reduction goals. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]