Search

Although multiple sclerosis has traditionally been considered a white matter disease, extensive research documents the presence and importance of grey matter injury including cortical and deep regions. The deep grey matter exhibits a broad range of pathology and is uniquely suited to study the mechanisms and clinical relevance of tissue injury in multiple sclerosis using magnetic resonance techniques. Deep grey matter injury has been associated with clinical and cognitive disability. Recently, MRI characterization of deep grey matter properties, such as thalamic volume, have been tested as potential clinical trial end points associated with neurodegenerative aspects of multiple sclerosis. Given this emerging area of interest and its potential clinical trial relevance, the North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis (NAIMS) Cooperative held a workshop and reached consensus on imaging topics related to deep grey matter. Herein, we review current knowledge regarding deep grey matter injury in multiple sclerosis from an imaging perspective, including insights from histopathology, image acquisition and post-processing for deep grey matter. We discuss the clinical relevance of deep grey matter injury and specific regions of interest within the deep grey matter. We highlight unanswered questions and propose future directions, with the aim of focusing research priorities towards better methods, analysis, and interpretation of results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Verbal memory is one of the most affected cognitive domains in patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses. Several studies have found associations between cognitive abilities and white matter fractional anisotropy (FA) in schizophrenia; however, only a few tractography studies have investigated FA relative to verbal memory in patients with a first episode of psychosis (FEP) compared with healthy controls (HC). Although white matter tractography differences have been well established between chronic patients and HC, the direction of findings from FEP studies has been inconsistent. Thus, the present study aims to examine wholebrain white matter differences and its association with verbal memory in individuals with a FEP relative to HC using tractography. Methods: Diffusion-weighted images were acquired on a 1.5T scanner for patients (n=65) and controls (n=54) at baseline. The Wechsler Memory Scale was used as a measure of verbal memory. Pre-processing was performed on a subject-by-subject basis using MRtrix. Diffusion tractography was generated using a probabilistic anatomically-constrained tractography algorithm, which constrains the reconstruction to specific biological priors. Furthermore, the spherical-deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms (SIFT) tool will be used to ensure the tractogram is biologically meaningful. This results in subject-specific connectomes defining the mean FA between two regions of interest that were defined using the Desikan- Killiany atlas. A linear model was used to test for main effect of group and main effect of verbal memory on white matter tract FA, covarying for age and sex. For both sets of analyses, results were corrected for multiple comparisons using false discovery rate (FDR). Results: A significant main effect of group on whole-brain average FA was observed, with patients displaying lower average FA compared to healthy controls (Patients=0.291, controls=0.300, p<0.05). Whole-brain white matter tract FA analysis revealed that there are widespread differences between controls and individuals with a FEP. Group most strongly predicted white matter tract FA differences between left caudal anterior cingulate and left lateral orbitofrontal (patients mean FA=0.302, controls mean FA=0.342), left hippocampus and right isthmus cingulate (patient mean FA= 0.217 controls mean FA= 0.318), and finally left lingual and left rostral anterior cingulate (patients mean FA=0.162, controls mean FA= 0.249. However, none survived correction for multiple comparisons. Further, there was no significant association between verbal memory and white matter tract FA in FEP or HC. Discussion: Findings from this study suggest there are some significant differences in whole-brain average FA between individuals experiencing a FEP and healthy controls. However, when analyzing whole-brain tract FA, none of the connections survived corrections for multiple comparisons. These findings might be limited by the scanner resolution included in this study, which may not capture more subtle differences. Nonetheless, these results are consistent with a cross-sectional study comparing healthy individuals to chronic and first-episode patients suggesting that modest differences are present early in the disease and increase as the disease progresses. We suggest that future studies analyze white matter tract using a longitudinal design to identify disease progression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]