Search

OBJECTIVE To address to what extent central hemodynamic measurements, improve risk stratification, and determine outcome-based diagnostic thresholds, we constructed the International Database of Central Arterial Properties for Risk Stratification (IDCARS), allowing a participant-level meta-analysis. The purpose of this article was to describe the characteristics of IDCARS participants and to highlight research perspectives. METHODS Longitudinal or cross-sectional cohort studies with central blood pressure measured with the SphygmoCor devices and software were included. RESULTS The database included 10,930 subjects (54.8% women; median age 46.0 years) from 13 studies in Europe, Africa, Asia, and South America. The prevalence of office hypertension was 4,446 (40.1%), of which 2,713 (61.0%) were treated, and of diabetes mellitus was 629 (5.8%). The peripheral and central systolic/diastolic blood pressure averaged 129.5/78.7 mm Hg and 118.2/79.7 mm Hg, respectively. Mean aortic pulse wave velocity was 7.3 m per seconds. Among 6,871 participants enrolled in 9 longitudinal studies, the median follow-up was 4.2 years (5th–95th percentile interval, 1.3–12.2 years). During 38,957 person-years of follow-up, 339 participants experienced a composite cardiovascular event and 212 died, 67 of cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS IDCARS will provide a unique opportunity to investigate hypotheses on central hemodynamic measurements that could not reliably be studied in individual studies. The results of these analyses might inform guidelines and be of help to clinicians involved in the management of patients with suspected or established hypertension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND Early-onset hypertension has been established as a heritable trait and a risk factor for cardiovascular disease outcomes. However, the clinical correlates of early-onset hypertension remain unidentified. METHODS In this study, we assessed the demographic characteristics and lifestyle factors related to hypertension onset age in a sample of 3,286 Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study participants (mean baseline age 25 ± 4 years, 57% women). We examined the association between the participants' baseline characteristics and age of hypertension onset subgroups (<35, 35‒44, or ≥45 years) using a multinomial logistic regression model with those who did not develop hypertension as the reference group. Hypertension onset was defined as blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg or antihypertensive medication use on 2 consecutively attended follow-up visits. RESULTS In the multinomial logistic regression model, individuals who were black (odds ratio [OR], 5.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.17–8.14), were more obese (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.32–1.88), or had higher total cholesterol (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.13–1.60 per SD) had increased odds of early-onset hypertension (onset at <35 years) vs. not developing hypertension. In contrast, 1-SD higher high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol was related to decreased odds of early-onset hypertension (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57–0.89). The odds for having earlier hypertension onset increased linearly across age of onset categories in black individuals and individuals with lower HDL-cholesterol (P < 0.05 for trend for both). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that individuals who are black, obese, have higher total cholesterol, or have lower HDL-cholesterol level, are potentially at an increased risk of having early-onset hypertension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Objectively defined early onset hypertension, based on repeated blood pressure measurements, is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to assess if also self-reported hypertension onset age is associated with hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD). Additionally, we evaluated the agreement between self-reported and objectively defined hypertension onset age. Methods We studied 2,649 participants (50 ± 4 years at the time of outcome assessment, 57% women) of the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study who underwent measurements for echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), coronary calcification, and albuminuria. We divided the participants into groups according to self-reported hypertension onset age (<35 years, 35–44 years, ≥45 years, and no hypertension). We used multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models to assess the relation between self-reported hypertension onset age with the presence of HMOD, with those who did not report hypertension as the referent group. Results Compared with individuals without self-reported hypertension, self-reported hypertension onset at <35 years was associated with LVH (odds ratio (OR), 2.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.51–3.76), LVDD (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.28–4.18, coronary calcification (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.50–5.47), and albuminuria (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 0.81–3.26). Self-reported hypertension onset at ≥45 years was only associated with LVDD (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.06–3.08). The agreement between self-reported and objectively defined hypertension onset age groups was 78–79%. Conclusions Our findings suggest that self-reported hypertension onset age, a pragmatically feasible assessment in clinical practice, is a reasonable method for assessing risk of HMOD and CVD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Comprehensive conjoint characterization of long-term trajectories representing several biological systems is lacking.Methods: We measured serially indicators representing 14 distinct biological systems in up to 3,453 participants attending four Framingham Study examinations: bone mineral density, body mass index (BMI), C-reactive protein, glomerular filtration rate, forced vital capacity (FVC), 1 second forced expiratory volume/FVC ratio (FEV1/FVC), gait speed, grip strength, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), heart rate, left ventricular mass, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), pulse pressure, and total/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (TC/HDL).Results: We observed that correlations among the 14 sex-specific trajectories were modest (r < .30 for 169 of 182 sex-specific correlations). During follow-up (median 8 years), 232 individuals experienced a cardiovascular disease (CVD) event and 393 participants died. In multivariable regression models, CVD incidence was positively related to trajectories of BMI, HbA1c, TC/HDL, gait time, and pulse pressure (p < .06); mortality risk was related directly to trajectories of gait time, C-reactive protein, heart rate, and pulse pressure but inversely to MMSE and FEV1/FVC (p < .006). A unit increase in the trajectory risk score was associated with a 2.80-fold risk of CVD (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.04-3.84; p < .001) and a 2.71-fold risk of death (95% CI, 2.30-3.20; p < .001). Trajectory risk scores were suggestive of a greater increase in model c-statistic compared with single occasion measures (delta-c compared with age- and sex-adjusted models: .032 vs .026 for CVD; .042 vs .030 for mortality).Conclusions: Biological systems age differentially over the life course. Longitudinal data on a parsimonious set of biomarkers reflecting key biological systems may facilitate identification of high-risk individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND Nighttime blood pressure (BP) and nondipping pattern are strongly associated with hypertensive end-organ damage. However, no previous studies have compared the diagnostic agreement between ambulatory and home monitoring in detecting these BP patterns in the general population. METHODS We studied a population-based sample of 180 persons aged 32–80 years. The study protocol included 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, home daytime measurements over 7 days, home nighttime measurements (6 measurements over 2 consecutive nights using a timer-equipped home device), and ultrasound measurements for left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT). We defined nondipping as a <10% reduction in nighttime BP compared with daytime BP, and nighttime hypertension as BP ≥ 120/70 mm Hg. RESULTS The agreement between ambulatory and home monitoring for detecting nighttime hypertension was good (80%, κ = 0.56, P < 0.001). However, their agreement in detecting nondipping status was poor (54%, κ = 0.12, P = 0.09). The magnitude of ambulatory systolic BP dipping percent was 1.7% higher than on home monitoring (P = 0.004), whereas no difference was observed for diastolic BP dipping (difference: 0.7%, P = 0.33). LVMI and IMT were significantly greater among individuals with nighttime hypertension than in normotensive individuals, irrespective of the measurement method. However, only ambulatory nondippers, but not home nondippers, had more advanced end-organ damage than dippers. CONCLUSION We observed a good agreement between ambulatory and home BP monitoring in detecting nighttime hypertension in the general population. Two-night home monitoring could offer an inexpensive and feasible method for the diagnosis of nighttime hypertension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Current guidelines make no recommendations on the optimal timing or number of measurements for assessing home blood pressure variability (HBPV). Our aim was to elucidate the optimal schedule for measuring HBPV in relation to cardiovascular risk. METHODS In total, 1,706 Finnish adults (56.5 ± 8.5 years; 54% women) self-measured their home blood pressure (HBP) twice in the morning and evening during 7 consecutive days. The participants were followed up for cardiovascular events. We examined the association between HBPV (coefficient of variation based on 2 through 7 measurement days) and cardiovascular events using Cox regression models adjusted for HBP and other cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS During a follow-up of 11.8 ± 3.1 years, 216 cardiovascular events occurred. Systolic morning HBPV based on three (hazard ratio [HR], 1.039; 95% confidence interval, 1.006-1.074, model c statistic 0.737) through seven (HR, 1.057; 95% confidence interval, 1.012-1.104, model c statistic 0.737) measurement days was significantly associated with cardiovascular events. Agreement in classification to normal vs. increased morning day-to-day HBPV between consecutive measurement days became substantial (κ = 0.69 for systolic and κ = 0.68 for diastolic) after the fourth measurement day. The associations of diastolic HBPV, evening HBPV, all-day HBPV, and variability based on first measurements of each measurement occasion, with cardiovascular outcomes were nonsignificant or remained significant only after the sixth measurement day. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest systolic HBP should be measured twice in the morning for at least 3 days when assessing HBPV. Increasing the number of measurement days from 3 to 7 results in marginal improvement in prognostic accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Parental hypertension is known to predict high blood pressure (BP) in children. However, the extent to which risk for hypertension is conferred across multiple generations, notwithstanding the impact of environmental factors, is unclear. Our objective was therefore to evaluate the degree to which risk for hypertension extends across multiple generations of individuals in the community. Methods and results We studied three generations of Framingham Heart Study participants with standardized blood pressure measurements performed at serial examinations spanning 5 decades (1948 through 2005): First Generation (n = 1809), Second Generation (n = 2631), and Third Generation (n = 3608, mean age 39 years, 53% women). To capture a more precise estimate of conferrable risk, we defined early-onset hypertension (age <55 years) as the primary exposure. In multinomial logistic regression models adjusting for standard risk factors as well as physical activity and daily intake of dietary sodium, risk for hypertension in the Third Generation was conferred simultaneously by presence of early-onset hypertension in parents [OR 2.10 (95% CI, 1.66-2.67), P < 0.001] as well as in grandparents [OR 1.33 (95% CI, 1.12-1.58), P < 0.01]. Conclusion Early-onset hypertension in grandparents raises the risk for hypertension in grandchildren, even after adjusting for early-onset hypertension in parents and lifestyle factors. These results suggest that a substantial familial predisposition for hypertension exists, and this predisposition is not identical when assessed from one generation to the next. Additional studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying transgenerational risk for hypertension and its clinical implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND Blood pressure (BP) monitor technology has developed significantly over the past years with the introduction of smaller and quieter home and ambulatory monitors that can both measure BP at night. The acceptability of different BP measurement methods using modern monitors is currently unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare patients' acceptability of traditional and novel BP measurement methods using up-to-date monitors. METHODS A population sample of 223 participants underwent 4 office measurements on 2 occasions, a 24-hour ambulatory monitoring and 4 home measurements on 7 consecutive days with home nighttime (homenight) measurements on 2 nights. The acceptability of each method was evaluated with a questionnaire. Analysis of variance with post hoc Bonferroni correction was used to compare mean acceptability scores. RESULTS Mean acceptability score, with a lower score indicating better acceptability, decreased from ambulatory (3.11 ± 0.93) to home-night (2.74 ± 0.81) to home (2.20 ± 0.70) to office (1.95 ± 0.63) measurements (P < 0.001 for all between-method comparisons). The largest betweenmethod differences were observed in comfort of use and disturbance of everyday activities (P < 0.001). 73.1%, 31.8%, 1.3%, and 2.2% rated office, home, home-night, and ambulatory measurements as the most acceptable method, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In the general population and under a research setting, office BP measurement was the method most preferred by the participants while home measurement was the second most preferred. Home-night measurement was slightly more preferred than ambulatory monitoring. However, before home-night BP measurement can be widely promoted as an alternative method for measuring nighttime BP, more evidence of its prognostic significance is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND Current guidelines make no outcome-based recommendations on the optimal measurement schedule for home blood pressure (BP). METHODS We enrolled 4,802 randomly recruited participants from three populations. The participants were classified by their (i) cross-classification according to office and home BP (normotension, masked hypertension, white-coat hypertension, and sustained hypertension) and (ii) home BP level (normal BP, high normal BP, grade 1 and 2 hypertension), while the number of home measurement days was increased from 1 to 7. The prognostic accuracy of home BP with an increasing number of home BP measurement days was also assessed by multivariable-adjusted Cox models. RESULTS Agreement in classification between consecutive measurement days indicated near perfect agreement (κ ≥ 0.9) after the sixth measurement day for both office and home BP cross-classification (97.8% maintained classification, κ = 0.97) and home BP level (93.6% maintained classification, κ = 0.91). Over a follow-up of 8.3 years, 568 participants experienced a cardiovascular event, and the first home BP measurement alone predicted events significantly (P ≤ 0.003). The confidence intervals (CIs) were too wide and overlapping to show superiority of multiple measurement days over the first measurement day (hazard ratios per 10 mm Hg increase in systolic BP at initial day, 1.11 [CI 1.07–1.16]; that at 1–7 days, 1.18 [CI 1.12–1.24]). Masked hypertension, but not white-coat hypertension, was associated with increased cardiovascular risk, irrespective of the number of home measurement days. CONCLUSION Even a single home BP measurement is a potent predictor of cardiovascular events, whereas seven home measurement days may be needed to reliably diagnose hypertension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND The implementation of lifestyle modifications, home blood pressure (BP) measurement, and optimization of antihypertensive drug therapy have been shown to improve BP control in tightly controlled research settings. Our objective was to determine the effect of these interventions in a primary care setting, with the family practitioners and nurses serving as the interventionists. METHODS Two hundred twenty hypertensive patients were recruited from 2 health centers that operated in the same building and covered similar populations, with the health centers randomized to function as intervention or control sites. Participants in the intervention group received repeated individual and group counseling from the centrally trained staff of the health center on healthy lifestyles. In addition, their antihypertensive drug therapy was guided by home BP measurements performed at 3-month intervals instead of by conventional office measurements. RESULTS After 12 months of follow-up, the between-group differences in the changes of lifestyle variables (body mass index, physical activity, dietary recalls, and urinary sodium/potassium) were nonsignificant. Antihypertensive treatment intensity increased in both groups, but the between-group difference was nonsignificant (P = 0.63). Office systolic/diastolic BP decreased significantly in the intervention (8/6mm Hg; P < 0.001) and control (11/7mm Hg; P < 0.001) groups, but the between-group differences were nonsignificant (P = 0.25/0.16). CONCLUSIONS Our intervention did not improve BP control as suggested by many prior studies performed in controlled academic settings. This result could be attributed to a lack of motivation and incentives among the staff or because the population was relatively unselected. Greater attention to education and financial incentives might be required in typical primary care settings to obtain better results. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER NCT01915199 [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare home and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in the adjustment of antihypertensive treatment. Methods: After a 4-week washout period, patients whose untreated daytime diastolic ambulatory BP averaged ≥85 mm Hg were randomized to be treated according to their ambulatory or home BP. Antihypertensive treatment was adjusted at 6-week intervals according to the mean daytime ambulatory diastolic BP or the mean home diastolic BP, depending on the patient’s randomization group. If the diastolic BP stayed above 80 mm Hg, the physician blinded to randomization intensified hypertensive treatment. Results: Ninety-eight patients completed the study. During the 24-week follow-up period both systolic and diastolic BP decreased significantly within both groups (P < .001). At the end of the study, the systolic/diastolic differences between ambulatory (n = 46) and home (n = 52) BP groups in home, daytime ambulatory, night-time ambulatory, and 24-h ambulatory BP changes averaged 2.6/2.6 mm Hg, 0.6/1.7 mm Hg, 1.0/1.4 mm Hg, and 0.6/1.5 mm Hg, respectively (P range .06 to .75) A nonsignificant trend to more intensive drug therapy in the ambulatory BP group and a nonsignificant trend to larger share of patients reaching (57.7% v 43.5%, P = .16) the target pressure in the home BP group was observed due to the 3.8 mm Hg difference in ambulatory and home diastolic BP at randomization. Conclusions: The adjustment of antihypertensive treatment based on either ambulatory or home BP measurement led to good BP control. No significant between-group differences in BP changes were seen at the end of the study. Additional research is needed to provide more conclusive results. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The article presents a study which states that increased blood pressure variability is related with an increased risk of incident cardiovascular disease. It suggests that increased blood pressure variability could be only a surrogate marker of poor adherence to increased alcohol use or therapy, which in turn are causally related to adverse outcomes. A novel approach to elucidating the factors underlying blood pressure variability is discussed.