Search

Studies over the past three years have substantially expanded the involvements of eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3) in messenger RNA (mRNA) translation. It now appears that this multi-subunit complex is involved in every possible form of mRNA translation, controlling every step of protein synthesis from initiation to elongation, termination, and quality control in positive as well as negative fashion. Through the study of eIF3, we are beginning to appreciate protein synthesis as a highly integrated process coordinating protein production with protein folding, subcellular targeting, and degradation. At the same time, eIF3 subunits appear to have specific functions that probably vary between different tissues and individual cells. Considering the broad functions of eIF3 in protein homeostasis, it comes as little surprise that eIF3 is increasingly implicated in major human diseases and first attempts at therapeutically targeting eIF3 have been undertaken. Much remains to be learned, however, about subunit- and tissue-specific functions of eIF3 in protein synthesis and disease and their regulation by environmental conditions and post-translational modifications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type (WT) glioblastoma (GBM) accounts for 90% of all GBMs, yet only 27% of isocitrate dehydrogenase WT-GBMs have p53 mutations. However, the tumor surveillance function of WT-p53 in GBM is subverted by mechanisms that are not fully understood.Methods: We investigated the proteolytic inactivation of WT-p53 by asparaginyl endopeptidase (AEP) and its effects on GBM progression in cancer cells, murine models, and patients' specimens using biochemical and functional assays. The sera of healthy donors (n = 48) and GBM patients (n = 20) were examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Furthermore, effects of AEP inhibitors on GBM progression were evaluated in murine models (n = 6-8 per group). The statistical significance between groups was determined using two-tailed Student t tests.Results: We demonstrate that AEP binds to and directly cleaves WT-p53, resulting in the inhibition of WT-p53-mediated tumor suppressor function in both tumor cells and stromal cells via extracellular vesicle communication. High expression of uncleavable p53-N311A-mutant rescue AEP-induced tumorigenesis, proliferation, and anti-apoptotic abilities. Knock down or pharmacological inhibition of AEP reduced tumorigenesis and prolonged survival in murine models. However, overexpression of AEP promoted tumorigenesis and shortened the survival time. Moreover, high AEP levels in GBM tissues were associated with a poor prognosis of GBM patients (n = 83; hazard ratio = 3.94, 95% confidence interval = 1.87 to 8.28; P < .001). A correlation was found between high plasma AEP levels and a larger tumor size in GBM patients (r = 0.6, P = .03), which decreased dramatically after surgery.Conclusions: Our results indicate that AEP promotes GBM progression via inactivation of WT-p53 and may serve as a prognostic and therapeutic target for GBM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Asparaginyl endopeptidase (AEP) has been implicated in human cancer development. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying AEP regulation, including the role of pro-AEP activation, remain elusive.Methods: We investigated the regulation of AEP by TRAF6 and its effects on tumor progression and metastasis in cancer cell lines, murine models, and specimens from patients using biochemical analyses, confocal microscopy, immunoelectron microscopy, and migration-invasion assays. The sera of healthy donors and breast cancer patients were examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and a tissue array of 314 breast cancer specimens was assessed for AEP and TRAF6 by immunohistochemistry. Furthermore, the effects of AEP inhibitors or monoclonal antibodies on pulmonary metastasis were evaluated in murine models. The statistical significance between groups was determined using two-tailed Student t tests.Results: We demonstrate that TRAF6 ubiquitinates the proform of AEP through K63-linked polyubiquitin, reversible by USP17, and forms a complex with HSP90α to subsequently promote pro-AEP intracellular stability as well as secretion. Disrupting the interaction between pro-AEP and TRAF6 or inhibiting HSP90α reduced pro-AEP secretion and consequently reduced tumor metastasis. Higher circulating AEP levels were detected in the sera of breast cancer patients, and AEP inhibitors or neutralizing antibodies remarkably decreased tumor metastasis in murine models. Notably, TRAF6 and AEP were overexpressed in human breast neoplasms and correlated with poor prognosis. Patients with low AEP/TRAF6 expression survived for a mean of 111 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 108 to 115 months), whereas those with high AEP/TRAF6 expression survived for a mean of only 61 months (95% CI = 42 to 79 months; P < .001).Conclusions: Our study elucidates a novel mechanism of AEP regulation and an alternative oncogenic pathway for TRAF6 in breast cancer, which suggests that AEP and TRAF6 protein levels may have prognostic implications in breast cancer patients. Thus, AEP may serve as a biomarker as well as new therapeutic target. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]