Search

Background: Dietary restraint, a term used to describe the intentional control of food intake to prevent weight gain or promote weight loss, is commonly practiced by older adults, but little is known about its effects on physiology and metabolism.Methods: We therefore compared a wide range of parameters between groups of healthy non-obese postmenopausal women classified psychometrically as unrestrained eaters (body mass index [BMI] 23.8 +/- 0.6 [SEM] kg/m(2), n = 28) or restrained eaters (BMI 24.5 +/- 0.5, n = 39). Measurements were made of reported micronutrient intakes, cardiopulmonary function, hematology, body temperature, skin thickness, bone mass, and immune function; in addition, self-perceived health, mood, and some dimensions of eating behavior were assessed by questionnaire.Results: Macronutrient and micronutrient intakes were not significantly different between restrained and unrestrained eaters reporting energy intake to within 30% of predicted total energy expenditure. Restrained eaters had significantly lower hemoglobin (12.9 +/- 0.1 [SEM] vs 13.2 +/- 0.1 g/dl; p <.05), but values were within the normal range in both groups. In addition, restrained eaters scored significantly higher on the Eating Attitudes Test (p <.01) and drive-for-thinness (p <.001) and maturity fears (p <.05) subscores of the Eating Disorders Inventory, but values were again within the normal range. No other parameter differed significantly between groups.Conclusions: In this normal-weight population, restrained eating was not associated with detrimental effects in a wide range of physiological, metabolic, and health characteristics. Further work is needed to determine the relevance of these results to the general population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent studies have suggested a short-term impairment in the regulation of food intake in older adults, but further studies are needed to determine if a longer-term impairment exists and to identify underlying causes. Changes in body weight and composition were measured over a 6-week underfeeding study and a 6-month follow-up period in healthy young (n = 23) and older (OLD, n = 18) men and women. The young adults were either normal weight (YNW, n = 12) or overweight (YOW, n = 11). Energy intakes during underfeeding were 896 +/- 18 (SEM) kcal less than weight-maintenance energy requirements determined prior to underfeeding. In addition, changes in perceived hunger during underfeeding were monitored in a subgroup (n = 19). OLD and YOW subjects lost significantly more weight during underfeeding than did YNW subjects (p = .025 and .000, respectively), and they did not gain back significant weight in the 6-month follow-up. In addition, OLD subjects reported a significantly lower frequency of hunger during underfeeding (p = .05). There was no significant difference among groups in the relationship between weight lost and fat-free mass lost. Healthy OLD adults have an impaired ability to regulate food intake over at least 6 months following underfeeding compared with YNW adults, and a reduction in their perceived frequency of hunger may be a contributing factor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Individual susceptibility to obesity is recognized to be influenced significantly by genetic inheritance. Recently, candidate obesity genes have been identified that may contribute to the inheritance of body fat mass and the partitioning of fat between central and peripheral fat depots. In studies of animal models of obesity, the genetic basis for obesity in the obese (Ob/Ob) mouse, the Fat mouse, and the Yellow (Vvy) mouse has been identified. Further research is needed to determine whether abnormalities in these genes contribute to human obesity as well. In studies of humans, sequence variation in at least six genes has been linked to increased body fatness and/ or susceptibility to obesity. In addition, five other encoding genes have been linked to a disproportionate storage of fat in the abdominal region. These genes identified in studies of humans are currently thought to be modifying or background genes, each separately conferring a modest increase in susceptibility to fatness. Further research is needed to identify additional candidate genes that confer susceptibility to obesity and to determine the relative importance of each one in a range of human populations with distinct environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]