Search

Post-primary school students ( n = 2407) and young adults ( n = 477) participated in a cross-sectional evaluation of a health education programme for schools. The Lifeskills programme is based on a philosophy of student empowerment, and aims to teach knowledge and skills relevant to health promoting behaviour. School students were recruited in schools, while young adults were opportunistically recruited in workplaces, training centres and on public transport. Those who attended schools where Lifeskills had been taught and who remembered such lessons were conservatively classified as the intervention group, while those who attended other schools and did not remember such lessons were classified as the comparison group. Participants completed questionnaires designed to collect data on health-related behaviours, indicators, knowledge and psychological health. School-level factors were employed as covariates in subsequent analyses of covariance. Amongst younger pupils, females reported more positive health behaviours but lower levels of psychological well-being and more symptoms. The impact of the programme became evident at ages 13–15. Those involved drank less and reported more positive adjustment to school. However, sex differences remained, with females reporting more health-promoting behaviour and more symptoms, and lagging behind males in self-esteem and general well-being. An interaction between gender and the intervention was identified among senior pupils. Exposure was especially beneficial for females. However, as young adults, the two main effects of gender and programme participation re-emerged as the most important independent variables, and the interaction between them was not significant. This pattern has implications for the interpretation of evaluations conducted on short-term interventions as well as for short-term impact evaluations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Demonstrating long-term impacts of research can be fraught with methodological challenges, especially when approached retrospectively. Potential accusations of bias or over-interpretation, and a lack of clear and specific causal data, can be real obstacles. This paper presents a case study of research impact, including enablers and context to aid interpretation. To develop a national set of child wellbeing indicators in line with UNCRC commitments, a participative study of children’s understandings of wellbeing was undertaken to accompany a Delphi study with experts. The children contributed a number of unique indicators, including having ‘good places to spend free time’. Methods: Public actions which aimed to meet Irish commitments to child wellbeing were documented. Collected evidence comprised the development of, and reporting on, a national set of wellbeing indictors for children, the development and implementation of two national policies and cyclical monitoring data, collected through the nationally representative data sets of the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study in Ireland, 2002-2018. Results: Measurement of stakeholder-informed indicators helped stimulate national policies on play (2004) and recreation (2007). Partnership-based policy implementation led to increases in spaces for play and recreation. Trends data from the HBSC study revealed significant and meaningful increases in ‘good places to go spend free time’ for children aged 10-17 from 45.1% in 2002 to 63.5% in 2018, and for all sociodemographic sub-groups. Temporal analyses showed that increases followed policy implementation. Conclusions: This impact case study links an original participative study, though policy development and implementation, to long-term improvements in Irish children reporting having ‘good places to spend free time’. An understanding of the decision-making context at key points is important to aid interpretation of the evidence under investigation. Key messages: · Commitment to child participation influenced national indicator adoption, policy development and implementation, with subsequent improvements to children’s healthrelated environments. ·The quality and specificity of data needed to demonstrate long-term research impact is challenging and interpretation requires contextualisation to avoid leaps of faith. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Focuses on a study which assessed knowledge of and attitudes to coronary heart disease and associated risk factors in Ireland. Background to the study; Methods; Discussion.