Search

Competence in healthcare is a recognized expectation by consumers. In 2018 following an extensive review and consensus-building process, burn nursing practice competencies were published. Clinical nurse leaders were called upon to use these published competencies in practice as a basis for the requisite knowledge and skills needed in the care of the burn-injured individual. In 2019 at the 51st Annual Meeting of the American Burn Association, nurses from four U.S. burn centers reported on their center's incorporation of the competencies within their educational nursing curriculums. This paper provides a forum for each of the lead authors from Rhode Island Hospital Burn Center, the University of Utah Health Burn Trauma Intensive Care Unit, Parkland Regional Burn Center, and the University of Chicago Medicine Burn Center to outline their current utilization of the new burn nurse competencies and plans for future use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On August 27 and 28, 2018, the American Burn Association, in conjunction with Underwriters Laboratories, convened a group of experts on burn and inhalation injury in Washington, DC. The goal of the meeting was to identify and discuss the existing knowledge, data, and modeling gaps related to understanding cutaneous thermal injury and inhalation injury due to exposure from a fire environment, and in addition, address two more areas proposed by the American Burn Association Research Committee that are critical to burn care but may have current translational research gaps (inflammatory response and hypermetabolic response). Representatives from the Underwriters Laboratories Firefighter Safety Research Institute and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Fire Research Laboratory presented the state of the science in their fields, highlighting areas that required further investigation and guidance from the burn community. Four areas were discussed by the full 24 participant group and in smaller groups: Basic and Translational Understanding of Inhalation Injury, Thermal Contact and Resulting Injury, Systemic Inflammatory Response and Resuscitation, and Hypermetabolic Response and Healing. A primary finding was the need for validating historic models to develop a set of reliable data on contact time and temperature and resulting injury. The working groups identified common areas of focus across each subtopic, including gaining an understanding of individual response to injury that would allow for precision medicine approaches. Predisposed phenotype in response to insult, the effects of age and sex, and the role of microbiomes could all be studied by employing multi-omic (systems biology) approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minority groups has been well-documented in general and plastic surgery but not in burn surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate current minority group disparities among burn surgery leadership. A cross-sectional analysis was performed. Burn surgeons included directors of American Burn Association-verified burn centers in the United States, past and current presidents of the American Burn Association, and editorial board members of five major burn journals (Journal of Burn Care & Research, Burns, Burns & Trauma, Annals of Burns & Fire Disasters, and the International Journal of Burns and Trauma). Surgeons were compared based on factors including age, gender, training, academic rank, and Hirsch index (h-index). Among 71 burn center directors, 50 societal presidents, and 197 journal editors, minority groups represented 18.3, 2.0, and 34.5%, respectively. Among burn center directors, the group classified collectively as nonwhite was significantly younger (49 vs 56; P < .01), graduated more recently (2003 vs 1996; P < .01), and had a lower h-index (9.5 vs 17.4; P < .05). There were no significant differences in gender, type of residency training, advanced degrees obtained, fellowships, academic rank, and academic leadership positions between white and nonwhite groups. When compared with the 2018 U.S. National Census, burn unit directors had a 5.1% decrease in nonwhite representation. Disparities in representation of ethnic and racial minorities exist in burn surgery despite having similar qualifying factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Managing multicenter clinical trials (MCTs) is demanding and complex. The Randomized controlled Evaluation of high-volume hemofiltration in adult burn patients with Septic shoCk and acUte kidnEy injury (RESCUE) trial was a prospective, MCT involving the impact of high-volume hemofiltration continuous renal replacement therapy on patients experiencing acute kidney injury and septic shock. Ten clinical burn centers from across the United States were recruited to enroll a target sample size of 120 subjects. This manuscripts reviews some of the obstacles and knowledge gained while coordinating the RESCUE trial. The first subject was enrolled in February 2012, 22 months after initial IRB approval and 29 months from the time the grant was awarded. The RESCUE team consisted of personnel at each site, including the lead site, a data coordination center, data safety monitoring board, steering committees, and the sponsor. Seven clinical sites had enrolled 37 subjects when enrollment stopped in February 2016. Obstacles included changes in institutional review boards, multiple layers of review, staffing changes, creation and amendment of study documents and procedures, and finalization of contracts. Successful completion of a MCT requires a highly functional research team with sufficient patient population, expertise, and research infrastructure. Additionally, realistic timelines must be established with strategies to overcome challenges. Inevitable obstacles should be discussed in the pretrial phase and continuous correspondence must be maintained with all relevant research parties throughout all phases of study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While disparities in healthcare outcomes and services for vulnerable populations have been documented, the extent to which vulnerable burn populations demonstrate disparities in long-term care is relatively underexplored. This study's goal was to assess for differences in long-term occupational or physical therapy (OT/PT) and psychological service use after burn injury in vulnerable populations. Data from the Burn Model System National Database (2006-2015) were analyzed. The vulnerable group included participants in one or more of these categories: 65 years of age or older, nonwhite, no insurance or Medicaid insurance, preinjury receipt of psychological therapy or counseling, preinjury alcohol and/or drug misuse, or with a preexisting disability. Primary outcomes investigated were receipt of OT/PT and psychological services. Secondary outcomes included nine OT/PT subcategories. Outcomes were examined at 6, 12, and 24 months postinjury. One thousand one hundred thirty-six burn survivors (692 vulnerable; 444 nonvulnerable) were included. The vulnerable group was mostly female, unemployed at time of injury, and with smaller burns. Both groups received similar OT/PT and psychological services at all time points. Adjusted regression analyses found that while the groups received similar amounts services, some vulnerable subgroups received significantly more services. Participants 65 years of age or older, who received psychological therapy or counseling prior to injury, and with a preexisting disability received more OT/PT and psychological or peer support services at follow-up. Overall, vulnerable and nonvulnerable groups received comparable OT/PT and psychological services. The importance of long-term care among vulnerable subgroups of the burn population is highlighted by this study. Future work is needed to determine adequate levels of follow-up services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Burns are among the most common injuries to children, and, although survival rates have improved, many burn survivors are left with scars and/or other visible differences, which may be associated with anxiety, depression, and/or low self-esteem. A better understanding of the prevalence and persistence of these problems in child and adolescent burn survivors might lead to an expanded paradigm of care and possibly to better outcomes. The present study provides longitudinal prevalence data for the Appearance Concerns (AC) subscale of the parent-reported Burn Outcomes Questionnaire (BOQ) for 5- to 18-year-old children and identifies patient characteristics associated with higher risk for appearance concerns. Subjects were 799 pediatric burn survivors who were assessed prospectively using the parent-reported BOQ5-18, which was administered soon after their discharge from acute care and again every 3 to 6 months for up to 4 years. Approximately 20% of all youth were reported to have appearance concerns over the first 2 years, after which the rate declined gradually, falling to around 10% after 3 years. This study showed that such concerns were prevalent and persistent years after burn injuries and suggested that larger burns, facial burns, and country of origin outside of the United States were all associated with higher scores on the AC subscale. These findings highlight the importance of assessing appearance concerns in the long-term care of young burn survivors and suggest that the BOQ5-18 AC subscale could be used to identify individuals with heightened appearance concerns and to measure their response to interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The military has used silver-nylon dressings as a topical antimicrobial on combat-related burns for the past 15 years. However, their clinical efficacy and associated risks have not been evaluated. Herein, the authors document our experience with the use of a specific silver-nylon dressing (Silverlon®) during global evacuation of casualties from combat zones to the United States sArmy Institute of Surgical Research Burn Center. A 10-year retrospective analysis was performed. Variables included patient demographics, total body surface area, length of stay, Injury Severity Score, incidence of urinary tract and burn infections, pneumonia, patient status at the time of discharge, and a composite endpoint. The patient cohort was stratified into two groups: Silverlon® (Group 1) and topical antimicrobial agents (Group 2). Data were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests (P ≤ .05). Nine hundred eighty-eight patients (26 ± 6 years) were identified with 184 patients (Group 1) and 804 patients (Group 2). Silver-nylon dressings trended toward decreased wound infection rate (5.4 vs 9.5%) even when applied to full-thickness burn injuries. When compared with topical antimicrobial agents, the silver-nylon dressing was not associated with significant differences in burn-related complication. The authors demonstrate the antimicrobial efficacy of the silver-nylon dressing during global evacuation of burn casualties from combat zones to the burn center. Compared with topical antimicrobials, the silver-nylon dressing is lightweight and easy to apply and requires minimal wound management which makes it desirable as a burn dressing for combat applications as well as mass casualty situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare, type IV hypersensitivity reactions of the skin and mucosa. These reactions (SJS/TEN) are frequently managed in burn units; however, no standardized guidelines exist for the treatment and management of SJS/TEN. To gain insight into current SJS/TEN management practices, a survey on admission, diagnosis, and management, was conducted across accredited burn units in the United States. A 28-item question survey on SJS/TEN management, diagnosis, and treatment practices was distributed among medical directors and co-directors of American Burn Association-verified burn centers. Responses were collected over a 6-week period. In total, 31 (48% response rate) burn unit medical directors/co-directors participated in the survey. The majority of responders indicate that acceptance to their burn unit is based on clinical suspicion of SJS/TEN (74%), and biopsy or dermatological evaluation is not required (67 and 87%, respectively). More than half (61%) of the burn units have their own SJS/TEN protocol in place. No consensus was observed on different treatment aspects, such as infection control, systemic treatment, and wound care. Most directors reported their burn units to consult ophthalmology (77%) and dermatology (54%) for the management of patients with SJS/TEN. Large variability in procedures of admission, treatment, and management of SJS/TEN was identified across burn centers. This study demonstrates the urgent need for SJS/TEN standardized guidelines in the United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]