1. Has the COVID-19 pandemic changed existing patterns of non-COVID-19 health care utilization? A retrospective analysis of six regions in Europe.
- Author
-
Aldridge, Sarah J, Schmidt, Andrea E, Thißen, Martin, Bernal-Delgado, Enrique, Estupiñán-Romero, Francisco, González-Galindo, Javier, Dolanski-Aghamanoukjan, Lorenz, Mathis-Edenhofer, Stefan, Buble, Tamara, Križ, Klea, Vuković, Jakov, Palmieri, Luigi, Unim, Brigid, Meulman, Iris, Owen, Rhiannon K, and Lyons, Ronan A
- Subjects
MEDICAL care use ,HEALTH services accessibility ,WOUNDS & injuries ,MYOCARDIAL infarction ,PSYCHOLOGICAL resilience ,BEHAVIOR modification ,PREDICTION models ,RESEARCH funding ,MAJOR adverse cardiovascular events ,HEALTH ,RETROSPECTIVE studies ,AGE distribution ,INFORMATION resources ,CRISIS intervention (Mental health services) ,HEALTH behavior ,MEDICAL records ,ACQUISITION of data ,MEDICAL research ,ELECTIVE surgery ,PUBLIC health ,COMPARATIVE studies ,HEALTH promotion ,POSTOPERATIVE period ,COVID-19 pandemic ,REGRESSION analysis ,EMERGENCY management - Abstract
Background Resilience of national health systems in Europe remains a major concern in times of multiple crises and as more evidence is emerging relating to the indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care utilization (HCU), resulting from de-prioritization of regular, non-pandemic healthcare services. Most extant studies focus on regional, disease specific or early pandemic HCU creating difficulties in comparing across multiple countries. We provide a comparatively broad definition of HCU across multiple countries, with potential to expand across regions and timeframes. Methods Using a cross-country federated research infrastructure (FRI), we examined HCU for acute cardiovascular events, elective surgeries and serious trauma. Aggregated data were used in forecast modelling to identify changes from predicted European age-standardized counts via fitted regressions (2017–19), compared against post-pandemic data. Results We found that elective surgeries were most affected, universally falling below predicted levels in 2020. For cardiovascular HCU, we found lower-than-expected cases in every region for heart attacks and displayed large sex differences. Serious trauma was the least impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion The strength of this study comes from the use of the European Population Health Information Research Infrastructure's (PHIRI) FRI, allowing for rapid analysis of regional differences to assess indirect impacts of events such as pandemics. There are marked differences in the capacity of services to return to normal in terms of elective surgery; additionally, we found considerable differences between men and women which requires further research on potential sex or gender patterns of HCU during crises. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF