Search

Background There is significant concern that cancer care is adversely impacted due to the coronavirus disease pandemic. Using the national database, we document the impact of the pandemic on cancer diagnosis in Japan. Methods Data from 735 hospital-based cancer registries, covering >70% of newly diagnosed cases, were analysed. We compared trends during 2016–2019 and those in 2020 by the type of cancer, diagnostic process, stage and 13 prefectures as requiring special precautions to prevent the spread of infection. Results Overall, the number of patients who began treatment decreased by 1.9% in 2020 as compared with the average number during 2016–2019. A sharp decline of 13.8% was observed for stomach cases. The decline in cases (22.0% decrease for all cancers) was more pronounced in May. Cancer screening and resulting detection decreased significantly in 2020 (8.1–24.3%). Case registrations of stage I and II gastric cancer, stage II intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, stage II oesophageal cancer, stage 0 and I laryngeal cancer and stage II gallbladder cancer decreased by >10% compared with those in 2018 and 2019. The trends in cancer cases by area of residence indicated a decline in 13 prefectures in May 2020 compared with other areas. Conclusions The number of cancer diagnoses decreased during the year 2020 under coronavirus pandemic, especially right after the Japanese government declared the first state of emergency in April. We need to carefully observe the consequences of these decrease in diagnosis, or perhaps the delay in care, on patient survival or population mortality.

Background Hospital-based cancer registries were developed to describe and improve clinical care for cancer patients. We described the hospital-based cancer registry coverage as a reference for the users, including researchers, policymakers and clinicians. Methods The hospital-based cancer registry coverage was defined as the proportion of new cases registered in the hospital-based cancer registry to the National Cancer Registry as the denominator. To examine the coverage of respective cancer types, age groups and prefecture in the hospital-based cancer registry, cases were grouped based on the 10th International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems and were compared with the published report of the National Cancer Registry in 2017. Results The overall hospital-based cancer registries coverage was 71.7%, and 52.5% of patients were treated at designated cancer care hospitals. The hospital-based cancer registries coverage and treatment rates at designated cancer care hospitals varied per cancer type, age group, and prefecture. The hospital-based cancer registries covered over 80% of the patients with cancers of the larynx, uterus, oesophagus, lip, oral cavity, pharynx and skin, whereas patients’ coverage with thyroid cancer was relatively low. The hospital-based cancer registry coverage of young patients (80%, whereas that for elderly patients (≥85 years) was Conclusions The hospital-based cancer registry coverage is ~70% of all cancers. Because the coverage differed across cancers and age groups, the respective target groups’ analysis should consider this factor.

Background Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) yields better outcomes and fewer toxicities for radiation therapy (RT) of head and neck cancers (HNCs), including nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). IMRT is the standard RT treatment and has been widely adopted in Western countries to treat HNCs. However, its uptake in clinical practice among NPC patients has never been studied. Methods We investigated the use of IMRT for NPC using data from a nationwide cancer registry to describe the use of IMRT among NPC patients in Japan. We analyzed the data of patients with HNC, including NPC, who underwent IMRT between 2012 and 2014, as recorded in the hospital-based cancer registries linked with insurance claims. We calculated the proportion of patients with NPC who underwent IMRT at each hospital. To evaluate the use of IMRT for NPC, the IMRT use for NPC was compared with the proportion of patients with prostate cancer who underwent IMRT. Results Among 508 patients with NPC who underwent RT at one of 87 hospitals, 348 (69%) underwent IMRT. This proportion gradually increased between 2012 and 2014 (62%, 64% and 77%). Meanwhile, 4790 patients with prostate cancer (90%) underwent IMRT. Although some hospitals where IMRT was performed treated many patients with NPC, the proportion of patients with NPC who were treated with IMRT was low. Conclusions IMRT has not been widely adopted in Japan for treating NPC. Barriers for adopting its use should be identified to close the gap between the standard and actual medical practice in Japan.

Radiotherapy and bevacizumab are each effective in treating patients with advanced cancer, but their concurrent use may cause serious adverse events (SAEs). Whereas sequential administration can theoretically reduce the risk of SAEs while maintaining the anticancer effects, this hypothesis remains unconfirmed, leading to variations in practice. To elucidate current practices, the patterns of care received by patients in Japan with regard to these two therapies were assessed in a large database of a hospital-based cancer registry linked with insurance claims. This database contained information on 106 057 patients diagnosed with seven major cancers in 2011 and the care they received up to the end of 2012. In total, 335 patients from 101 hospitals in the database were treated with both radiotherapy and bevacizumab. Of these patients, 50.8% had lung cancer, and 51.3% had Stage IV cancer. Of the 335 patients, 75 (22.4%) received these therapies concurrently. In patients treated sequentially, the time from the last dose of bevacizumab to the start of radiotherapy was most frequently 4–5 weeks (12.4%), whereas the time from the end of radiotherapy to the start of bevacizumab was most frequently 1–2 weeks (10.6%). The cumulative proportions of patients in these two groups receiving sequential therapies within 3 weeks were 19.0% and 26.1%, respectively. Many practices appeared to avoid the concurrent use of bevacizumab and radiation, but some provided concurrent therapy. Additional data are required to determine whether the avoidance of concurrent use should become a standard of care.

Objective: Differences in hospital case-mix have not been adequately accounted for in hospital volume and patient outcome studies in Japan. We aimed to examine whether differences may exist by investigating the distribution of patients’stage and age across designated cancer treatment hospitals of varying patient volume across Japan. Methods: We analyzed data of gastric, breast, colorectal, lung and liver cancer patients who were included in the national database of hospital-based cancer registries between 2008 and 2011. We investigated the association between hospital volume, cancer stage and patient age. Hospitals were classified into five groups according to patient volume. Results: In total, 676 713 patients met the inclusion criteria. The proportion of patients with earlystage (tumor–node–metastasis Stage 0 or I) cancer was higher among high-volume hospitals for all cancer types except small cell lung cancer. The proportion of older patients (age >75 years) was smaller among high-volume hospitals for all cancer types. The difference in the proportion of patients with early-stage cancers between very low-volume and very high-volume hospitals was greatest for non-small cell lung cancer (26.5% for very low and 43.5% for very high). This difference for the proportion of older patients was also greatest for non-small cell lung cancer (48.9% for very low and 30.3% for very high). Conclusions: We showed that the proportions of early-stage cancer patients and younger patients are greater in higher-volume hospitals compared with lower-volume hospitals in Japan. Researchers conducting volume–outcome studies and policymakers analyzing hospital performance should be cautious when making interhospital comparisons.

Objective The effect of heparinoid moisturizer use after acute skin damage for patients receiving whole-breast radiotherapy after lumpectomy is understudied. Methods A total of 30 patients were randomly assigned to receive heparinoid moisturizer (Group M), and 32 patients comprised the control group (Group C). Patients in Group M were instructed to apply heparinoid moisturizer from 2 weeks following whole-breast radiotherapy, and to continue to use the moisturizer until 3 months after completion of whole-breast radiotherapy. Group C patients were instructed to not apply any topical moisturizer during the study period. The relative ratio of skin water content ratio (RWCR(t) = (It /Nt)/(I0/N0)) between irradiated and non-irradiated field was calculated. Signs and symptoms were also assessed. The primary endpoint was the difference in relative ratio of skin water content ratio between 2 and 4 weeks following whole-breast radiotherapy. Results In Group C, relative ratio of skin water content ratio dropped to 0.80 ± 0.15 at 2 weeks and maintained the low level at 4 weeks following whole-breast radiotherapy. Similarly, in Group M, relative ratio of skin water content ratio dropped to 0.81 ± 0.19 at 2 weeks (prior to application), however, it returned to baseline level (1.05 ± 0.23) at 4 weeks (2 weeks after application). The arithmetic difference of relative ratio of skin water content ratio in Group M was 0.24 ± 0.23 and was significantly larger than in Group C (0.06 ± 0.15; P < 0.01). Skin dryness and desquamation were less severe in Group M. Conclusions The application of heparinoid moisturizer for 2 weeks following whole-breast radiotherapy significantly increased water content and helped improve skin dryness and desquamation compared with no use of moisturizer.