1. A SUMO-regulated activation function controls synergy of c-Myb through a repressor–activator switch leading to differential p300 recruitment
- Author
-
Odd S. Gabrielsen, Petra Isabel Lorenzo, Vilborg Matre, Siv Gilfillan, Thomas Sæther, Heidi Kvaløy, and Ann-Kristin Molværsmyr
- Subjects
Protein sumoylation ,SUMO-1 Protein ,SUMO protein ,Repressor ,Gene Regulation, Chromatin and Epigenetics ,Biology ,Cell Line ,Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myb ,Genetics ,Animals ,Humans ,MYB ,Promoter Regions, Genetic ,Transcription factor ,Regulation of gene expression ,Promoter ,DNA ,Molecular biology ,Chromatin ,Protein Structure, Tertiary ,Cell biology ,Repressor Proteins ,Gene Expression Regulation ,Trans-Activators ,E1A-Associated p300 Protein ,Protein Binding - Abstract
Synergy between transcription factors operating together on complex promoters is a key aspect of gene activation. The ability of specific factors to synergize is restricted by sumoylation (synergy control, SC). Focusing on the haematopoietic transcription factor c-Myb, we found evidence for a strong SC linked to SUMO-conjugation in its negative regulatory domain (NRD), while AMV v-Myb has escaped this control. Mechanistic studies revealed a SUMO-dependent switch in the function of NRD. When NRD is sumoylated, the activity of c-Myb is reduced. When sumoylation is abolished, NRD switches into being activating, providing the factor with a second activation function (AF). Thus, c-Myb harbours two AFs, one that is constitutively active and one in the NRD being SUMO-regulated (SRAF). This double AF augments c-Myb synergy at compound natural promoters. A similar SUMO-dependent switch was observed in the regulatory domains of Sp3 and p53. We show that the change in synergy behaviour correlates with a SUMO-dependent differential recruitment of p300 and a corresponding local change in histone H3 and H4 acetylation. We therefore propose a general model for SUMO-mediated SC, where SUMO controls synergy by determining the number and strength of AFs associated with a promoter leading to differential chromatin signatures.
- Published
- 2010