Search

Background For stage II colorectal cancer (CRC), the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial. Consensus molecular subtype (CMS) has been validated to be a prognostic tool for CRCs. In this study, CMS status was investigated as a prognostic biomarker for the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colorectal cancer. Materials and Methods The tissue microarray was retrospectively constructed of 165 nonconsecutive, primary, and sporadic stage II CRCs. CMS status was determined by immunohistochemistry staining of CDX2, HTR2B, FRMD6, and ZEB1, combining with microsatellite instability testing. The prognostic for adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy of CMS status was calculated by Kaplan‐Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to tumor location. Results Kaplan‐Meier curves indicated that CMS was associated with overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival for stage II CRCs. Cox regression analysis showed that CMS was an independent risk factor for OS. Among high‐risk clinicopathological factors, patients with CMS2/3 (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.445, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.227–0.875), left‐sided tumors (HR: 0.488, 95% CI: 0.247–0.968), or fewer than 12 lymph nodes examined (HR: 0.307, 95% CI: 0.097–0.974) had survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis showed that adjuvant chemotherapy only improved OS for patients with left‐sided tumors of CMS2/3 subtype. Regardless of CMS, right‐sided tumors had no benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion CMS is a better prognostic factor for adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II CRCs. Together with tumor location, CMS classification will aid in personalized treatment for stage II CRCs. Implications for Practice For stage II colorectal cancer (CRC), the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial, in that its minimal benefit (no more than 5% on average) is considered not worth the toxic effects of the drugs. There are still no effective prognostic and predictive biomarkers. This study showed that consensus molecular subtype (CMS) status is a predictive marker for adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy. Patients with left‐sided tumors of CMS2/3 subtype have survival benefit by receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, which will aid in personalized treatment for stage II CRCs. Moreover, this test of CMS based on immunohistochemistry is cheap, not time consuming, and easily conducted in the laboratories of most hospitals., Currently, no clinical evidence exists for the ability of consensus molecular subtype status to predict the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colorectal cancer. This article reports results of a study that adopted an immunohistochemical‐based classifier to validate the feasibility of this approach, assessing the prognostic and predictive accuracy of consensus molecular subtype status as a biomarker for adjuvant chemotherapy compared with traditional clinicopathological high‐risk factors.

Objective This study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of carbon nanoparticles suspension in tracking lymph node metastases of colorectal cancer. Methods Eligible patients diagnosed with stages I–III colorectal cancer in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between 1 May 2017 and 31 May 2018 fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in this prospective randomized controlled study. All the patients were randomly allocated to two groups: the nanocarbon group and the control group. Patients’ clinicopathological characteristics were compared between the nanocarbon group and the control group. For continuous variables, data were presented as mean (±SD) and differences between the two groups were compared by the Mann–Whitney U test; for categorical variables, data was presented as frequency (%) and the Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to compare the differences between two groups. Results All the patients’ characteristics between two groups did not achieve statistical significance (P > 0.05). Patients in nanocarbon group were more likely to be associated with more lymph nodes retrieved totally compared with control group (19.84 ± 6.428 vs. 17.41 ± 7.229, P Conclusions Our study confirmed the safety of using carbon nanoparticles suspension as a tracer in colorectal cancer. More importantly, nanocarbon could significantly increase the detected number of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer, which can help improve the accuracy of lymph node staging and even improve patients’ survival.

The purpose of our study was to develop a multigene signature based on transcriptome profiles of both mRNAs and lncRNAs to identify a group of patients who are at high risk of early relapse in stages II-III colon cancer. Firstly, propensity score matching was conducted between patients in early relapse group and long-term survival group from GSE39582 training series (N = 359) and patients were matched 1:1. Global transcriptome analysis was then performed between the paired groups to identify tumor specific mRNAs and lncRNAs. Finally, using LASSO Cox regression model, we built a multigene early relapse classifier incorporating 15 mRNAs and three lncRNAs. The prognostic and predictive accuracy of the signature was internally validated in 102 colon cancer patients and externally validated in other 241 patients. In the training set, patients with high risk score were more likely to suffer from relapse than those with low risk score (HR: 2.67, 95% CI: 2.07-3.46, P < 0.001). The results were validated in the internal validation set (HR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.23-3.78, P = 0.003) and external validation (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.42-2.48; P < 0.001) set. Time-dependent receiver operating curve at 1 year showed that the integrated mRNA-lncRNA signature [area under curve (AUC) = 0.742] had better prognostic accuracy than AJCC TNM stage (AUC = 0.615) in the entire 702 patients. In addition, survival decision curve analyses at 12 months revealed a good clinical usefulness of the integrated mRNA-lncRNA signature. In conclusion, we successfully developed an integrated mRNA-lncRNA signature that can accurately predict early relapse.