1. Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation (STAR AF): a randomized, multicentre, international trial
- Author
-
Paul Novak, Carlos A. Morillo, Vittorio Calzolari, Laurent Macle, Atul Verma, Jian Chen, Yaariv Khaykin, Esteban González Torrecilla, Roberto Mantovan, Guiseppe De Martino, Girish M. Nair, and Peter G. Guerra
- Subjects
Male ,Reoperation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Arrhythmia/electrophysiology ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Automated mapping ,Kaplan-Meier Estimate ,Ablation ,Pulmonary vein ,Electrocardiography ,Multicentre ,Recurrence ,Clinical Research ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Aged ,Fractionated electrograms ,business.industry ,Anticoagulants ,Atrial fibrillation ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Stenosis ,Treatment Outcome ,Persistent atrial fibrillation ,Catheter Ablation ,Cardiology ,Female ,Warfarin ,Randomized trial ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Af ablation ,business - Abstract
Aims This multicentre, randomized trial compared three strategies of AF ablation: ablation of complex fractionated electrograms (CFE) alone, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone, and combined PVI + CFE ablation, using standardized automated mapping software. Methods and results Patients with drug-refractory, high-burden paroxysmal (episodes >6 h, >4 in 6 months) or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) were enrolled at eight centres. Patients (n = 100) were randomized to one of three arms. For CFE alone (n = 34), spontaneous/induced AF was mapped using validated, automated CFE software and all sites 30 s at 1 year. Patients (age 57 ± 10 years, LA size 42 ± 6 mm) were 35% persistent AF. In CFE, ablation terminated AF in 68%. Only 0.4 PVs per patient were isolated as a result of CFE. In PVI, 94% had all four PVs successfully isolated. In PVI + CFE, 94% had all four PVs isolated, 76% had inducible AF with additional CFE ablation, with 73% termination of AF. There were significantly more repeat procedures in the CFE arm (47%) vs. PVI (31%) or PVI + CFE (15%) (P = 0.01). After one procedure, PVI + CFE had a significantly higher freedom from AF (74%) compared with PVI (48%) and CFE (29%) (P = 0.004). After two procedures, PVI + CFE still had the highest success (88%) compared with PVI (68%) and CFE (38%) (P = 0.001). Ninety-six percent of these patients were off anti-arrhythmics. Complications were two tamponades, no PV stenosis, and no mortality. Conclusion In high-burden paroxysmal/persistent AF, PVI + CFE has the highest freedom from AF vs. PVI or CFE alone after one or two procedures. Complex fractionated electrogram alone has the lowest one and two procedure success rates with a higher incidence of repeat procedures. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier number NCT00367757.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF