1. Stem cell mobilization with plerixafor and healing of diabetic ischemic wounds: A phase IIa, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
- Author
-
Mauro Rigato, A Bruttocao, Gian Paolo Fadini, Marco Grasso, Marta Mazzucato, Mirko Menegolo, Roberta Cappellari, Angelo Avogaro, and Benedetta Maria Bonora
- Subjects
Male ,0301 basic medicine ,Benzylamines ,Placebo-controlled study ,Context (language use) ,Cyclams ,Placebo ,clinical translation ,Placebos ,angiogenesis ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Double-Blind Method ,Human Clinical Article ,Diabetes mellitus ,Diabetes Mellitus ,Clinical endpoint ,Humans ,Medicine ,lcsh:QH573-671 ,mobilization ,Aged ,lcsh:R5-920 ,Wound Healing ,CXCR4 antagonist ,diabetes ,lcsh:Cytology ,business.industry ,Plerixafor ,Cell Biology ,General Medicine ,Interim analysis ,medicine.disease ,Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization ,hematopoietic stem cells ,Treatment Outcome ,030104 developmental biology ,Anesthesia ,CD34+ ,Female ,lcsh:Medicine (General) ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Developmental Biology ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Bone marrow‐derived cells contribute to tissue repair, but traffic of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) is impaired in diabetes. We therefore tested whether HSPC mobilization with the CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor improved healing of ischemic diabetic wounds. This was a pilot, phase IIa, double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial (NCT02790957). Patients with diabetes with ischemic wounds were randomized to receive a single subcutaneous injection of plerixafor or saline on top of standard medical and surgical therapy. The primary endpoint was complete healing at 6 months. Secondary endpoints were wound size, transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcO2), ankle‐brachial index (ABI), amputations, and HSPC mobilization. Twenty‐six patients were enrolled: 13 received plerixafor and 13 received placebo. Patients were 84.6% males, with a mean age of 69 years. HSPC mobilization was successful in all patients who received plerixafor. The trial was terminated after a preplanned interim analysis of 50% of the target population showed a significantly lower healing rate in the plerixafor vs the placebo group. In the final analysis data set, the rate of complete healing was 38.5% in the plerixafor group vs 69.2% in the placebo group (chi‐square P = .115). Wound size tended to be larger in the plerixafor group for the entire duration of observation. No significant difference was noted for the change in TcO2 and ABI or in amputation rates. No other safety concern emerged. In conclusion, successful HSPC mobilization with plerixafor did not improve healing of ischemic diabetic wounds. Contrary to what was expected, outside the context of hematological disorders, mobilization of diabetic HSPCs might exert adverse effects on wound healing., We randomized patients with diabetic ischemic wounds to receive stem cell mobilization with the CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor or placebo. Despite the fact that plerixafor successfully mobilized hematopoietic stem cells, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in the rates of wound healing and in surrogate measures of perfusion.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF