Search

Background Anti-PD-1 has activity in brain metastases (BM). This phase II open labeled non-randomized single arm trial examined the safety and efficacy of combining nivolumab with radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of patients with BM from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods This was a multicenter trial (NCT02978404) in which patients diagnosed with NSCLC or RCC, having ≤ 10 cc of un-irradiated BM and no prior immunotherapy were eligible. Nivolumab (240 mg or 480 mg IV) was administered for up to 2 years until progression. SRS (15–21 Gy) to all un-irradiated BM was delivered within 14 days after the first dose of nivolumab. The primary endpoint was intracranial progression free survival (iPFS). Results Twenty-six patients (22 NSCLC and 4 RCC) were enrolled between August 2017 and January 2020. A median of 3 (1–9) BM were treated with SRS. Median follow-up was 16.0 months (0.43–25.9 months). Two patients developed nivolumab and SRS related grade 3 fatigue. One-year iPFS and OS were 45.2% (95% CI 29.3–69.6%) and 61.3% (95% CI 45.1–83.3%), respectively. Overall response (partial or complete) of SRS treated BM was attained in 14 out of the 20 patients with ≥1 evaluable follow-up MRI. Mean FACT-Br total scores were 90.2 at baseline and improved to 146.2 within 2–4 months (P = .0007). Conclusions The adverse event profile and FACT-Br assessments suggested that SRS during nivolumab was well tolerated. Upfront SRS with the initiation of anti-PD-1 prolonged the 1-year iPFS and achieved high intracranial control. This combined approach merits validation randomized studies.

Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary central nervous system tumor in adults and is associated with a poor prognosis. The benefit of adding concomitant followed by adjuvant temozolomide to radiotherapy after maximal safe resection was demonstrated by Stupp and colleagues in 2005 and has since remained the standard of care. This regimen conferred a statistically significant benefit with a 2-year survival rate of 26.5% compared to 10.4% in patients treated with radiotherapy alone. Our primary goal was to retrospectively assess the clinical outcomes of patients with glioblastoma treated at our institution over the past 15 years by comparing the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from our cohort to data from the pivotal trial. Our secondary objective was to create a comprehensive database with clinical and pathological information in order to identify predictive and prognostic factors. We reviewed the clinical records of patients treated for glioblastoma from January 2005 to November 2019 at our center. We extracted data on survival and calculated OS and PFS using the Kaplan-Meier method. 617 patient charts were reviewed, out of which 17 were excluded because of missing data. The remaining 600 patients were included. Baseline demographic information was similar to that of the Stupp cohort, with the exception of a larger proportion of patients aged 50 or above (76% versus 69%, respectively). The median OS at our center was 14.3 months, 95% confidence interval [12.8-15.2], which was comparable to that of the original trial (14.6 months [13.2-16.8]). PFS was better in our cohort at 6 months (74.2% [70.7-77.7] versus 53.9% [48.1-59.6]) and 12 months (36.3% [32.5-40.2] versus 26.9% [21.8-32.1]), and comparable thereafter. Our study confirms that the data from the Stupp trial are reproducible in a Canadian academic center setting. Our database will allow us to explore potentially new predictive factors.

Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is an autosomal dominant neurocutaneous syndrome associated with the development of nervous system tumors, including vestibular schwannomas (VS), meningiomas, and ependymomas. Although considered a rare illness, it is a source of significant morbidity, mainly due to early hearing loss leading to decreased autonomy and productivity among young adults. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against VEGF, has been shown to improve audition and tumor size in observational studies on NF2-associated VS. The most common limitations in the literature include the lack of reliable control groups, the paucity of data on quality of life, and the lack of detailed audiology testing guidelines. Moreover, the cost of bevacizumab is a limiting factor in access to care. In our Canadian tertiary care center, bevacizumab has been offered to NF2 patients with VS complications without specific indications on optimal treatment initiation time or duration. We present a hybrid cohort study protocol with retrospective and prospective arms aimed at measuring the impacts of introducing a standardized treatment and surveillance protocol on tumor growth, hearing outcomes, and quality of life. Patients from the multidisciplinary neurofibromatosis clinic at the University of Montreal Health Center, Canada, will be evaluated for inclusion in the prospective arm through regular audiological evaluations and imaging. Eligible individuals will receive bevacizumab at an initial dose of 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks for a year while participating in serial audiological, radiological, and quality of life assessments. The results will be compared to those of our historical cohort. Our primary outcomes will be tumor growth rate (% per year) for vestibular schwannomas, meningiomas and ependymomas, audiological test results, and quality of life and subjective hearing estimated through standardized questionnaires (SF-36, SSQ). We hypothesize that patients enrolled in the prospective arm will show improved clinical response compared to our historical cohort.

Background.Uncertainty persists about the survival advantage of concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) plus radiotherapy (RT) in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). We compared the clinical outcome of unselected elderly GBM patients treated with 4 adjuvant treatment modalities, including the Stupp protocol.Methods.From 2010 to 2014, retrospective chart review was performed on 171 GBM patients aged ≥55 who received either concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) with standard 60 Gy/30 (SRT); CCRT with hypofractionated 40 Gy/15 (HRT); HRT alone; or TMZ alone. Stratification is by age (55–69, ≥70), KPS (Results.Out of 171 patients identified, 128(75%) had surgical resection, median age was 66(55–83), and median overall survival (mOS) 11.4mo. Majority (109/171) were treated according to the Stupp protocol (CCRT-SRT), and 106/171 received post-CCRT adjuvant TMZ (median of 3 cycles). In our population, age Conclusions.Our data suggests that, despite having a worse global prognostic than their younger counterparts, GBM patients ≥70yo with a good performance status could be treated according to the Stupp protocol with similar survival. Theses results need prospective confirmation.

BACKGROUND In glioblastomas (GBM) patients the first post-radiation MRI is usually difficult to interpret given the post-radiotherapy enhancement and possible pseudo-progression which is present in almost 50% of the patients. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed all patients with GBM treated between 2006 and 2017 at the CHUM (SARDO database). If the first brain MRI done within 3 months after the systemic treatment showed progression of contrast, these patients were considered pseudoprogressors (PsP) while the patients who had stable or response to treatment were the non-progressors (nP). If progression persisted in subsequent MRI with a change of treatment within 6 months, they were considered early progressors (eP). If subsequent MRI improved or was stable, they were classified as nP (or true pseudo-progression). RESULTS In our cohort of 470 patients with GBM, 57.7% were nP and 42.3% were PsP after the first post-treatment imagery. The median follow-up was 10 months. The nP had a longer mOS 15.3m vs 11.3m, p < 0.001, regardless of subsequent evolution. After the second assessment, 67.8% of PsP patients were then considered as eP and 36.4% of nP patients also progressed within 6 months. The nP either after the first or second evaluation had the same mOS (19.9m vs 18.3m), just like the eP (9.3m vs 8.6m), independently of the subsequent treatment. No demographic, molecular or clinical factor predicted PsP, except for tumor size (> 5cm, p=0.024). PsP incidence was similar between 2006–2011 (PsP 57.8%) and 2012–2017 (42.2%). The 1y OS with pseudo progression at the first MRI was 39.7% vs 54.8% with no progression (p=0.001) which has a meaningful impact for the patient. CONCLUSION Pseudo-progression is frequent (42%) in glioblastoma and predicts a poorer prognosis with 1y OS of 39,7%. In fact, PsP patients have more than two-thirds chance to progress precociously.

Background The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) does not recommend routine use of prophylactic antiepileptic drugs (pAEDs) in patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors. If used in the perioperative setting, discontinuation is suggested after the first postoperative week. It is unclear whether such recommendations are followed. Our objective was to compare our perioperative and long-term pAED use in glioma patients with AAN practice parameters. Methods Retrospective chart review was performed on 578 glioma patients from 2006 to 2013. Seizures and AED use were assessed at surgery, 3 months postoperatively and death, last visit or 16 months postoperatively. Patients were divided into three groups at surgery: seizure-free with pAED, seizure-free without pAED, and seizure patients. Long-term pAED use was defined as continued use at 3 months postsurgery without seizures. pAEDs efficacy, factors influencing its use, and survival were examined. Results Out of 578 patients identified, 330 (57.1%) were seizure-naïve preoperatively. There were no significant differences in age, histology, tumor location or resection status between seizure-free populations with and without prophylaxis. Of 330 seizure-naïve patients, 205 (62.1%) received pAEDs at surgery. Ninety-six (46.9%) of those patients were still on pAEDs 3 months postsurgery (median use = 58 days). Rate of long-term prophylaxis use decreased by 13.5% over 6 years (70.3% in 2006; 56.8% in 2012). Phenytoin was preferred in 2006 (98.2%) with increasing use of levetiracetam over 6 years (44.6% in 2012). The only predictive factor for pAED use was complete resection (P = .0069). First seizure prevalence was similar in both seizure-free populations (P = .91). The seizure population had more men (P = .007), younger patients (P < .0001), lower-grade gliomas (P = .0003) and survived longer (P = .001) compared with seizure-free populations. Conclusions In our center, long-term prophylactic AED use is high, deviating from current AAN Guidelines. Corrective measures are warranted.

BACKGROUND Before 2012, Temozolomide (TMZ) was used for low-grade gliomas (LGG) to avoid Lomustine toxicity. After 2012 RTOG data, Procarbazine, Lomustine and Vincristine (PCV) given sequentially with radiotherapy became standard treatment with the side effects burden associated. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed our SARDO clinical database of patients with low-grade glioma LGG grades 2 and 3 between 2006 and 2017 at CHUM University Health Center. Molecular profile for these tumors is reflex and standard in our institution since 2016. RESULTS A total of 123 patients were identified with grade 2 and grade 3 LGG; 37 (30%) treated with PCV and 86 (70%) received TMZ. Median follow up was 11mo for PCV 11mo vs 22mo TMZ. Both groups were balanced in terms of median age, sex, neurologic symptoms and surgery rate. 53% patients had tumor untested for IDH1-2 and codeletion1p19q because of diagnostic before 2016. Disparities were noted with a predominance of grade 3 in the TMZ group (74% vs 27%, p< 0.01). TMZ was the preferred regimen before 2012 (100% vs 43%) and PCV became the standard of care after 2012 (0% vs 57%). Radiation use as first line treatment was 90%. The 4y OS was not significantly longer for PCV 50% compared with TMZ 47% with mOS between both groups (PCV NR vs TMZ 39.9mo, p=0.158). When controlled for tumor grade, the 2y OS was 80% for PCV vs 64% for TMZ,p=0.542. The 4y PFS was trendly longer for PCV group 78% than TMZ group 45%, p=0.148. CONCLUSION As we are still waiting for the prospective ongoing prospective trials comparing these 2 regimens, PCV and radiation are still standard of care regimens for grade 2 and 3 LGG. This retrospective data is not reassuring for a replacement for PCV with TMZ.

BACKGROUND: American Academy of Neurology's 2000 practice parameter do not support routine use of prophylactic antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in newly diagnosed brain tumors. If used in the perioperative setting, they should be discontinued after the first postoperative week. However, it remains unclear whether such recommendations are followed. OBJECTIVE: To compare our use of long-term prophylactic AEDs in patients with gliomas to published practice guidelines by the AAN. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 578 glioma cases evaluated in a single tertiary care center from 2006-2013. Data collected included demographic factors, surgical procedure and tumor characteristics. Seizures and AED use were assessed at surgery, 3 months post-operatively and death/last visit/16 months. Long-term prophylactic AED use was defined as continued use of AED at 3 months post-surgery in the absence of seizures. Patients were divided into three groups at surgery: seizure-free with and without prophylactic AEDs, and seizure-patients. Survival, prophylaxis efficacy and factors influencing its use were calculated. RESULTS: Out of 578 patients operated between 2006-2013, 330(57.1%) were seizure-naïve pre-operatively. 205/330(62.1%) received prophylactic AED at surgery. 96/205(46.9%) 95%CI(40.2-54.7) were still on AED 3 months post-surgery (median use = 58 days; 95%CI(31-152)). Rate of long-term prophylaxis use decreased by 13.5% over 6 years (70.3%-2006;56.8%-2012). Dilantin was the preferred agent in 2006(98.2%) with increasing use of Keppra over the years (44.6%-2012). There were no significant differences in age, histology, localisation and resected status between the seizure-free populations with and without prophylaxis. However, seizure-population had more men (p = 0.0068), younger patients (p < 0.0001), lower-grade gliomas (p = 0.0003) and lived longer (p = 0.0012,HR = 0.5423,95%CI(0.3742, 0.7859)) compared to seizure-free populations. The only predictive factor for prophylactic AEDs use was complete resection (p = 0.0069,OR = 2.0292,95%CI(1.2202, 3.4177)). Prevalence of first seizure was similar in both seizure-free populations (p = 0.9104, HR = 0.9627, 95%CI(0.5153, 1.806)). CONCLUSIONS: In our centre, long-term prophylactic AED use is high, deviating from current AAN Guidelines. Corrective measures are warranted.