Search

Objectives Clinical and demographic features of cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis (CNGM) have not been fully explored due to the rarity of the disease. Herein we studied clinicopathologic characteristics of CNGM in a sizable hospital-based cohort. Methods A case-control study was performed to compare clinicopathologic characteristics between patients with CNGM and granulomatous mastitis other than CNGM and between CNGM with and without Corynebacterium identification. Results Cases of CNGM (n = 31) and non-CNGM (n = 30) were included. Compared with the non-CNGM group, patients with CNGM were statistically significantly younger (median age: 38 vs 43 years), were less likely to be smokers (9% vs 40%), were more likely to have a painful lesion (97% vs 77%) or a larger mass-like lesion (median size: 4.6 vs 1.9 cm), and tended to have a higher Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System score in radiologic studies (score ≥4: 81% vs 53%), positive Corynebacterium identification results (36% vs 0%), and a longer resolving time (12 vs 6 months; all P values for above comparisons Conclusions Our study further demonstrated that CNGM is a unique infectious disease with distinct clinicopathologic features.

To compare the Affirm VPIII molecular test (Becton Dickinson, Burlington, NC) with morphologic identification used in routine Papanicolaou (Pap) test screening in the detection and identification of Candida species, Trichomonas vaginalis, and Gardnerella vaginalis, we identified 431 cases with a concomitant Pap test and Affirm VPIII assay performed from the archives of a large academic institution. The study population consisted of women ranging in age from 17 to 79 years (mean and median ages, 33 and 31 years, respectively). With a routine Pap test, 60 patients (13.9%) were found to have bacterial vaginosis, 60 (13.9%) candidiasis, and 3 (0.7%) Trichomonas infection. With the Affirm VPIII assay, 183 (42.5%) patients tested positive for G vaginalis, 70 (16.2%) positive for Candida species, and 10 (2.3%) positive for T vaginalis. The differences were statistically significant. The results demonstrate that our patient population had a high incidence of bacterial vaginosis/Candida vaginitis; however, the Affirm VPIII was a more sensitive diagnostic test for the detection and identification of all 3 organisms compared with the Pap test.