Search

Item does not contain fulltext BACKGROUND: The Fc receptors II and III (FcgR2a, and FcgR3a) play a crucial role in the regulation of the immune response. The FcgR2a*519GG and FcgR3a*559CC genotypes have been associated with several autoimmune diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, nephritis, and possibly to type I diabetes, and celiac disease. In a large multicenter, two-stage study of 6570 people, we tested whether the FcgR2a and FcgR3a genes were also involved in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: We genotyped the FcgR2a*A519G and FcgR3a*A559C functional variants in 4205 IBD patients in six well-phenotyped Caucasian IBD cohorts and 2365 ethnically matched controls recruited from the Netherlands, Spain, and New Zealand. RESULTS: In the initial Dutch study we found a significant association of FcgR2a genotypes with IBD (P-genotype = 0.02); while the FcgR2a*519GG was more common in controls (23%) than in IBD patients (18%; odds ratio [OR] = 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.92; P = 0.004). This association was corroborated by a combined analysis across all the study populations (Mantel-Haenszel [MH] OR = 0.84; 0.74-0.95; P = 0.005) in the next stage. The Fcgr2a*GG genotype was associated with both UC (MH-OR = 0.84; 0.72-0.97; P = 0.01) and CD (MH-OR = 0.84; 0.73-0.97; P = 0.01), suggesting that this genotype confers a protective effect against IBD. There was no association of FcgR3a*A559C genotypes with IBD, CD, or UC in any of the three studied populations. CONCLUSIONS: The FcgR2a*519G functional variant was associated with IBD and reduced susceptibility to UC and to CD in Caucasians. There was no association between FcgR3a*5A559C and IBD, CD or UC. 01 december 2010

Background: As peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor–gamma (PPAR-γ) is frequently expressed in colon, its genetic polymorphism may play a role in the etiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aims of the present study were to determine the distribution of PPAR-γ polymorphisms Pro12Ala and C161T and to explore the association between the PPAR-γ genotypes and phenotypes of IBD patients. Methods: A total of 244 IBD patients [212 ulcerative colitis (UC) and 32 Crohn's disease (CD)] and 220 controls in the Chinese population and 603 IBD patients (302 UC and 301 CD) and 180 controls in the white Dutch population were enrolled in the study. The phenotypes of Chinese IBD patients were grouped according to disease location. The PPAR-γ polymorphisms Pro12Ala and C161T were genotyped by PCR-based methods. Results: In the Chinese population, T carriers of the PPAR-γ C161T polymorphism were more common in UC patients than in the controls [37.7% vs. 25.5%, odds ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.18–2.68, P = 0.007], whereas Ala carriers of the Pro12Ala polymorphism showed no significant association in UC patients, but there was a significant association of Ala carriers with more extensive disease among the UC patients (P = 0.002); Pro12Ala and C161T genotypes did not show any associations with CD patients. No associations were found for the PPAR-γ C161T SNP studied in the Dutch IBD population. Conclusions: Our study showed the potential association between the PPAR-γ C161T polymorphism and UC patients in the central Chinese population. This finding was not replicated in the Dutch population. Further studies are necessary to explore the functional implication of the PPAR-γ C161T polymorphism in Chinese UC patients. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2009;)