Search

Glioblastoma (GBM) patients can use tumor-treating fields (TTFs) with adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) to treat their disease. TTFs involve wearing transfixed transducers to the shaved scalp, and the transducers are wired to a battery pack that is either fixed or carried (weighing 2.7 pounds). EF-14 clinical trial did evaluate health-related quality of life with standardized patient-report outcome measures but did not measure exercise behavior. We sought to evaluate the exercise behavior of GBM patients using TTFs. We consented GBM patients who intended to use TTFs with adjuvant TMZ after completion of chemoradiation. After informed consent and before starting TTFs, patients completed a self-administered questionnaire, Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire, to assess exercise behavior/physical function. To calculate our primary outcome of total exercise behavior, the frequency of exercise sessions per week within each intensity category was multiplied by the average reported duration, weighted by an estimate of the MET, summed across all intensities, and expressed as average MET-hr/wk. Prior work has defined that physical function can be compared as < 9 MET-h/wk vs. ≥ 9 MET-h/wk. We evaluated at baseline and up to 24-week exercise behavior in patients with TTFs vs. historical controls not using TTFs. We enrolled 19 total GBM patients, with 14 proceeding to use TTFs. Of the 14 patients on TTFs, seven patients (50%) completed ≥ 9 MET-h/wk of exercise, and this level was maintained 8, 16, and 24 weeks after starting TTFs. Six months after the completion of chemoradiation, mean MET-h/wk was decreased in the TTFs group (n=6) (10.71 sd=7.06) vs. historical controls (n=38) (27.35 sd=46.94). TTFs did not interfere with exercise behavior in our GBM cohort, but when compared to GBM patients not utilizing TTFs, there could be a long-term impact on exercise behavior. More research is needed to evaluate exercise behavior in GBM patients using TTFs.

INTRODUCTION Vaccination with dendritic cells (DCs) fares poorly in primary and recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Moreover, GBM vaccine trials are often underpowered due to limited sample size. METHODS To address these limitations, we conducted three sequential clinical trials utilizing Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific DC vaccines in patients with primary GBM. Autologous DCs were generated and electroporated with mRNA encoding for the CMV protein pp65. Serial vaccination was given throughout adjuvant temozolomide cycles, and 111Indium radiolabeling was implemented to assess migration efficiency of DC vaccines. Patients were followed for median overall survival (mOS) and OS. RESULTS Our initial study was the phase II ATTAC study (NCT00639639; total n=12) with 6 patients randomized to vaccine site preconditioning with tetanus-diphtheria (Td) toxoid. This led to an expanded cohort trial (ATTAC-GM; NCT00639639) of 11 patients receiving CMV DC vaccines containing granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Follow-up data from ATTAC and ATTAC-GM revealed 5-year OS rates of 33.3% (mOS 38.3 months; CI95 17.5-undefined) and 36.4% (mOS 37.7 months; CI95 18.2-109.1), respectively. ATTAC additionally revealed a significant increase in DC migration to draining lymph nodes following Td preconditioning (P=0.049). Increased DC migration was associated with OS (Cox proportional hazards model, HR=0.820, P=0.023). Td-mediated increased migration has been recapitulated in our larger confirmatory trial ELEVATE (NCT02366728) of 43 patients randomized to preconditioning (Wilcoxon rank sum, Td n=24, unpulsed DC n=19; 24h, P=0.031 and 48h, P=0.0195). In ELEVATE, median follow-up of 42.2 months revealed significantly longer OS in patients randomized to Td (P=0.026). The 3-year OS for Td-treated patients in ELEVATE was 34% (CI95 19-63%) compared to 6% given unpulsed DCs (CI95 1-42%). CONCLUSION We report reproducibility of our findings across three sequential clinical trials using CMV pp65 DCs. Despite their small numbers, these successive trials demonstrate consistent survival outcomes, thus supporting the efficacy of CMV DC vaccine therapy in GBM.

INTRODUCTION Malignant glioma (MG) patients often experience chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Olanzapine has recently been added to national anti-emesis guidelines for patients on moderately/highly emetogenic chemotherapy. In this retrospective study, we investigated the use of olanzapine for refractory-CINV (R-CINV) in MG patients. METHODS In this chart review, we queried adult MG patients with KPS ≥ 70 who received olanzapine from January 2019-March 2020. Patients were included if they were prescribed olanzapine for CINV. Data on nausea/vomiting improvement, olanzapine dosing/schedule, number of refractory anti-emetic trials, concomitant corticosteroid use, and demographics were collected. RESULTS We identified 21 MG patients who were prescribed olanzapine, with 9 of those patients receiving olanzapine specifically for CINV. Seven patients had WHO grade IV glioma, and 2 patients had anaplastic astrocytoma (WHO grade III). Five of 9 patients (55.6%) were male, all were Caucasian and median age was 54 years. Patients tried an average of 3 anti-emetics prior to initiating olanzapine for R-CINV. Only one patient was taking concomitant corticosteroids; which is not in concordance with national anti-emesis guidelines. Four of 9 patients (44.4%) achieved control of R-CINV with olanzapine. The olanzapine dose and key biomarkers (IDH-status, MGMT promoter methylation) were similar between those experiencing R-CINV and those without symptoms. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we find that approximately half of patients with R-CINV achieved improved nausea and vomiting control with the addition of olanzapine. The lack of corticosteroid use for anti-emesis in MG continues to make this population challenging to manage. The relatively high success rate in patients that had failed, on average, 3 anti-emetics, suggests that olanzapine may be a potent addition to the anti-emetic toolkit for MG patients. These results inspire further large-scale research to validate this observation and define the optimal role for olanzapine in treating R-CINV in MG patients.

Dendritic cells (DCs) are pivotal in inducing immunity or alternatively downregulating immune reactivity. In humans, the opposing phenotypic subsets of CD11c(+)/CD123(-) "myeloid" DCs and CD123(+)/CD11c(-) "lymphoid" DCs have been proposed to orchestrate these immune responses. In this study we determined the absolute numbers of both subsets in three resting hematopoietic tissues by employing a novel flow cytometry method, eliminating processing steps and calculations based on mononuclear cell percentages. Internal bead standards along with the cells of interest were simultaneously acquired directly from unmanipulated whole blood specimens. We found significant differences (p < 0.001) between the mean absolute numbers of CD123(+)/CD11c(-) lymphoid DCs among the three sources, with the fewest present in peripheral blood (8.2/ micro l), about 50% more in cord blood (12.2/ micro l), and fivefold more in bone marrow (40.2/ micro l). Cord blood and bone marrow CD11c(+)/CD123(-) myeloid DC counts did not differ from each other (23.5/ micro l and 28.9/ micro l, respectively) but peripheral blood contained significantly fewer (15.5/ micro l, p = 0.006). CD11c(+)/CD123(-) DCs had significantly higher surface expression of HLA-DR (p < 0.001) in all three sources. To test for association with the DC subsets, T, B, and natural killer (NK) lymphocytes were also enumerated. In bone marrow only, significant correlations were found between the size of the CD123(+)/CD11c(-) lymphoid DC pool and NK cells (p = 0.0029) and B cells (p = 0.0033). These data support the hypothesis that a common CD123(+)/CD11c(-) DC, NK cell, and B cell progenitor is resident in marrow, and this cell may be identical to the common lymphoid progenitor previously described in mice and/or the human CD34(+)/Lin(-)/CD10(+) progenitor.