Search

Background A prospective 2002–2014 study stratified 160 patients by resection extent and histological grade, reporting results in 2016. We re-analyzed the series after a median of 119 months, adding retrospectively patients’ molecular features. Methods Follow-up of all patients was updated. DNA copy number analysis and gene-fusion detection could be completed for 94/160 patients, methylation classification for 68. Results Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5/10 years were 66/58%, and 80/73%. Ten patients had late relapses (range 66–126 mo), surviving after relapse no longer than those relapsing earlier (0–5 y). On multivariable analysis a better PFS was associated with grade II tumor and complete surgery at diagnosis and/or at radiotherapy; female sex and complete resection showed a positive association with OS. Posterior fossa (PF) tumors scoring ≥0.80 on DNA methylation analysis were classified as PFA (n = 41) and PFB (n = 9). PFB patients had better PFS and OS. Eighteen/32 supratentorial tumors were classified as RELA, and 3 as other molecular entities (anaplastic PXA, LGG MYB, HGNET). RELA had no prognostic impact. Patients with 1q gain or cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) loss had worse outcomes, included significantly more patients >3 years old (P = 0.050) and cases of dissemination at relapse (P = 0.007). Conclusions Previously described prognostic factors were confirmed at 10-year follow-up. Late relapses occurred in 6.2% of patients. Specific molecular features may affect outcome: PFB patients had a very good prognosis; 1q gain and CDKN2A loss were associated with dissemination. To draw reliable conclusions, modern ependymoma trials need to combine diagnostics with molecular risk stratification and long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this trial were to evaluate the feasibility, response, PFS/OS of a randomized study comparing two different RT schedules for DIPG while administering the same systemic treatment. METHODS: Patients: 2-21 years-old with a not-pretreated radiologically verified DIPG (MRI blindly reviewed at diagnosis and every 12 weeks thereafter) and symptoms duration below 6 months. Biopsy was required if suggested by atypical imaging. Vinorelbine 20 mg/m2+nimotuzumab 150 mg/m2 were administered weekly for 12 weeks; thereafter every other week until tumor progression or for up to 2 years. Standard(ST) arm included focal RT at total dose of 54Gy (1.8Gy/day); for local progression re-irradiation was proposed at 19.8Gy, in case of dissemination craniospinal irradiation(CSI) at 36Gy was adopted. Experimental(SP) arm included three elective courses of RT at defined timepoints at 36Gy, 19.8Gy and 19.8Gy with possible reirradiation for relapse at 9 Gy. Incidences of local(L) and distant(D) progression were assessed in a competing risk setting. RESULTS: Aggregated preliminary results are given for 4 Italian centers. 54 pts were screened and 51 included, 27 in ST, 28 males, median age 7 years (range 3-17). Median time of observation was 17.9 months. Twelve patients needed a shunt, 10 during treatment; 20 were biopsied, in 18 cases according local protocols. 19/20 tumors had H3.3 K27 mutation. 41 relapsed, 28 locally, 13 with a component of dissemination. 36 died, one for tracheotomy bleeding. SP irradiation was feasible and never produced significant radionecrosis. Median EFS/OS were 7.3/12.9 months, respectively; EFS/OS at 1 year were 19.0%/57.3%, not differing between patients with local vs. disseminated relapses. Patients submitted to biopsies had more dissemination (P=0.04) and less local progression (P=0.077). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment was feasible and OS confirmed previous results obtained in a single center. Randomization results will be later reported.

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this trial were evaluating the feasibility, response and PFS/OS of patients receiving upfront radiotherapy and reirradiation at progression with concomitant nimotuzumab/vinorelbine chemotherapy as the standard arm of the ongoing protocol for DIPG. METHODS: Patients aged 2-21 years with not-pretreated DMG (evidence of H3.3K27M mutation at immunohistochemistry) received vinorelbine 20 mg/m2+nimotuzumab 150 mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks; thereafter every other week until tumor progression or for up to 2 years. Focal photons irradiation was delivered within the 3rd week after first nimotuzumab+vinorelbine administration with a total dose of 54 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily fractions. For local progression re-irradiation was proposed at 19.8 Gy; in case of dissemination craniospinal-irradiation at 36 Gy was adopted. MRI were blindly centrally reviewed at diagnosis and every 12 weeks thereafter. RESULTS: Aggregated preliminary results are available for 20 patients from 4 Italian centers: 12 males, median age 11 years (range 3-17). Median time of observation was 12.5 months; 8 had thalamic/basal ganglia disease, in 5 pons was involved (2 pontobulbar, 3 pontomesencephalic), 6 spinal, 2 cerebellar. 13 patients had only biopsy, the others partial or near-total resection.14 relapsed: 5 locally, 4 with dissemination, 5 with both; 12 died, one was lost at follow-up. Two patients received reirradiation, one of them was irradiated three times without evidence of radionecrosis, still alive at 26 months from diagnosis. Median EFS/OS were 8.3/10.2 months, respectively; EFS/OS at 1 year were 25.8/36.7%. Survival curves between spinal and cerebral locations showed no difference. Patients after partial/near-total resection vs biopsied seemed to have earlier relapses (P 0.017) with EFS at 6 months of 34.3/75.0% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the first series of DMG homogeneously and prospectively treated; treatment was feasible. A potential role of reirradiation emerge as in DIPGs.

Aims of patient follow-up are: discovering relapse to apply second-line therapy for possible cure, accruing patients in phase 1/2 protocols if second-line therapy is not standardized/curative, evaluating/treating iatrogenic effects. To lessen the patient/family emotional and social economic burdens, we should ideally understand if scheduled radiological follow-up has a better rationale/outcome than the symptomatic relapse. We analyzed the Italian series of 2016 (doi:10.1093/neuonc/now108) comprehending 160 newly diagnosed pediatric/adolescent patients with intracranial ependymoma (EPD) according to relapse status (recurrence at scheduled exam [RECPT]/sign-symptomatic recurring [SYMPPT]). RECPT and SYMPPT were assessed in Cox model as time-dependent variables for overall survival (OS). Differences in characteristics between RECPT and SYMPPT subgroups were assessed by Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney or Fisher Exact tests. Kaplan-Meier curves depicted event-free survival (EFS) and OS after recurrence according to signs/symptoms. There were 16 SYMPPT /34 RECPT, at a median follow-up of 55 months. No significant differences were found between SYMPPT/RECPT for gender, age, tumor grade/site, shunt, residual disease, radiation boost, type of relapse (local/distant/combined). Time-to-relapse (median:19 months, range 5–104) and treatment adoption did not differ between SYMPPT/RECPT while signs/symptoms depicted an unfavorable factor for OS after relapse (5-year OS: 8% vs 37%). Adjusted model in multivariate analysis confirmed that presence of signs/symptoms was prognostically unfavorable. In order to improve the OS in symptomatic patients, their early identification-in the first two/three years after diagnosis- would be desirable. Perhaps, this could be obtained paying attention to “heuristically detected” subgroup of patients, not just describing general prognostic variables but discovering possible biology differences according to signs/symptoms.