1. Measuring the Impact of Patient Engagement in Health Research: An Exploratory Study Using Multiple Survey Tools.
- Author
-
Marshall DA, Suryaprakash N, Bryan S, Barker KL, MacKean G, Zelinsky S, McCarron TL, Santana MJ, Moayyedi P, and Lavallee DC
- Abstract
Background: Studies report various ways in which patients are involved in research design and conduct. Limited studies explore the influence of patient engagement (PE) at each research stage in qualitative research from the perspectives of all stakeholders., Methods: We established two small research groups, a Patient Researcher-Led Group and an Academic Researcher-Led Group. We recruited patient research partners (PRP; n = 5), researchers ( n = 5), and clinicians ( n = 4) to design and conduct qualitative research aimed at identifying candidate attributes related to patient preferences for tapering biologic treatments in inflammatory bowel disease. We administered surveys before starting, two months into, and post-project work. The surveys contained items from three PE evaluation tools. We assessed the two groups regarding the influence and impact each stakeholder had during the different research stages., Results: PRPs had a moderate or a great deal of influence on the critical research activities across the research stages. They indicated moderate/very/extremely meaningful engagement and agreed/strongly agreed impact of PE. PRPs helped operationalize the research question; design the study and approach; develop study materials; recruit participants; and collect and interpret the data., Conclusion: The three tools together provide deeper insight into the influence of PE at each research stage. Lessons learnt from this study suggest that PE can impact many aspects of research including the design, process, and approach in the context of qualitative research, increasing the patient-centeredness of the study. More comprehensive validated tools are required that work with a more diverse subject pool and in other contexts., Competing Interests: Deborah A. Marshall discloses consulting fees from the Office for Health Economics, Novartis, and Analytica during the conduct of this study. She also received support from Illumina for travel expenses to attend a meeting. Nitya Suryaprakash and Karis L. Barker received reimbursement of expenses related to conference attendance from the SPOR IMAGINE Chronic Disease Network. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this article., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF