1. Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes After Introduction of a Dedicated Infectious Diseases–Critical Care Medicine Service in Critical Care Units
- Author
-
Kelsie Cowman, Nadia Ferguson, Uzma N. Sarwar, Jay Berger, Inessa Gendlina, Liise Anne Pirofski, Gregory Weston, Polina Trachuk, Ruth Eisenberg, Vagish Hemmige, Peter V. Dicpinigaitis, and Victor Chen
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.drug_class ,Cefepime ,Antibiotics ,antibiotic stewardship ,infectious diseases ,intensive care unit ,law.invention ,Major Articles ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,law ,Multidisciplinary approach ,Intervention (counseling) ,Intensive care ,medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Intensive care medicine ,business.industry ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,Retrospective cohort study ,Intensive care unit ,critical care ,AcademicSubjects/MED00290 ,Oncology ,Vancomycin ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Background Infection is a leading cause of admission to intensive care units (ICUs), with critically ill patients often receiving empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics. Nevertheless, a dedicated infectious diseases (ID) consultation and stewardship team is not routinely established. An ID–critical care medicine (ID-CCM) pilot program was designed at a 400-bed tertiary care hospital in which an ID attending was assigned to participate in daily rounds with the ICU team, as well as provide ID consultation on select patients. We sought to evaluate the impact of this dedicated ID program on antibiotic utilization and clinical outcomes in patients admitted to the ICU. Methods In this single-site retrospective study, we analyzed antibiotic utilization and clinical outcomes in patients admitted to an ICU during the postintervention period from January 1 to December 31, 2017, and compared it to antibiotic utilization in the same ICUs during the preintervention period from January 1 to December 31, 2015. Results Our data showed a statistically significant reduction in usage of most frequently prescribed antibiotics including vancomycin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and cefepime during the intervention period. When compared to the preintervention period there was no difference in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay, and readmission. Conclusions With this multidisciplinary intervention, we saw a decrease in the use of the most frequently prescribed broad-spectrum antibiotics without a negative impact on clinical outcomes. Our study shows that the implementation of an ID-CCM service is a feasible way to promote antibiotic stewardship in the ICU and can be used as a strategy to reduce unnecessary patient exposure to broad-spectrum agents.
- Published
- 2021