Search

Background: Although adjuvant cancer treatments increase cure rates, they may induce clonal selection and tumor resistance. Information still lacks as whether (neo)adjuvant anti-HER2 treatments impact the patterns of recurrence and outcomes of HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We aimed to assess this in the large multicenter ESME real-world database., Patients and Methods: We examined the characteristics and outcomes (overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival under first-line treatment (PFS1)) of HER2+ patients with MBC from the French ESME program with recurrent disease, as a function of the previous receipt of adjuvant trastuzumab. Multivariable analyses used Cox models adjusted for baseline demographic, prognostic factors, adjuvant treatment received, and disease-free interval., Results: Two thousand one hundred and forty-three patients who entered the ESME cohort between 2008 and 2017 had a recurrent HER2+ MBC. Among them, 56% had received (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab and 2.5% another anti-HER2 in this setting. Patients pre-exposed to trastuzumab were younger, had a lower disease-free interval, more HR-negative disease and more metastatic sites. While the crude median OS appeared inferior in patients exposed to adjuvant trastuzumab, as compared to those who did not (37.2 (95%CI 34.4-40.3) versus 53.5 months (95% CI: 47.6-60.1)), this difference disappeared in the multivariable model (HR = 1.05, 95%CI 0.91-1.22). The same figures were observed for PFS1., Conclusions: Among patients with relapsed HER2+ MBC, the receipt of adjuvant trastuzumab did not independently predict for worse outcomes when adjusted to other prognostic factors., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Rituximab has been demonstrated to be highly effective as a first-line treatment for moderate-to-severe pemphigus; however, its high cost can be considered a limitation of this treatment., Objectives: To compare direct costs of two regimens, rituximab + short-term prednisone vs. prednisone alone, tested in the Ritux3 trial., Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 2 g of rituximab and two 500-mg maintenance infusions at month 12 and month 18 along with low doses of prednisone for 3-6 months, or high doses of prednisone alone tapered over 12-18 months. We estimated the direct costs related to (i) protocol (treatments, consultations, hospitalizations); (ii) unfavourable disease course (relapse); and (iii) adverse events in both treatment groups during a 3-year follow-up., Results: Annual individual cost discrepancies related to drugs decreased from +€3597 to -€1589 from the first to the third year, which corresponded to an initially higher cost in the rituximab group, counterbalanced during follow-up by costs related to treatment of patients with persistent disease activity/relapses in the standard corticosteroid (CS) group. Individual costs relating to treatment of adverse events were higher in the standard CS group (€4352) than in the rituximab group (€2468). Overall, mean individual total cost over the 3 years of follow-up was €13 997 in the standard CS arm vs. €14 818 in the rituximab arm, corresponding to a difference of €821 more per patient (+6%)., Conclusions: First-line treatment of pemphigus with rituximab results in a slightly greater cost compared with a standard CS regimen. What's already known about this topic Rituximab is the most effective treatment for moderate-to-severe pemphigus. Rituximab cost might be considered as a limitation of this treatment. What does this study add? After 3 years of follow-up, mean individual total cost for a patient with first-line treatment with rituximab was €14 818 vs. €13 997 with standard corticosteroids (CS), resulting in a slightly higher cost of €821 (+6%). The initially greater cost of rituximab was counterbalanced by costs related to management of flares/relapses in patients treated with a standard CS regimen., (© 2019 British Association of Dermatologists.)