Search

Introduction: In battle-injured U.S. service members, head and neck (H&N) injuries have been documented in 29% who were treated for wounds in deployed locations and 21% who were evacuated to a Role 4 MTF. The purpose of this study is to examine the H&N surgical workload at deployed U.S. military facilities in Iraq and Afghanistan in order to inform training, needed proficiency, and MTF manning., Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of the DoD Trauma Registry was performed for all Role 2 and Role 3 MTFs, from January 2002 to May 2016; 385 ICD-9 CM procedure codes were identified as H&N surgical procedures and were stratified into eight categories. For the purposes of this analysis, H&N procedures included dental, ophthalmologic, airway, ear, face, mandible maxilla, neck, and oral injuries. Traumatic brain injuries and vascular injuries to the neck were excluded., Results: A total of 15,620 H&N surgical procedures were identified at Role 2 and Role 3 MTFs. The majority of H&N surgical procedures (14,703, 94.14%) were reported at Role 3 facilities. Facial bone procedures were the most common subgroup across both roles of care (1,181, 75.03%). Tracheostomy accounted for 16.67% of all H&N surgical procedures followed by linear repair of laceration of eyelid or eyebrow (8.23%) and neck exploration (7.41%). H&N caseload was variable., Conclusions: H&N procedures accounted for 8.25% of all surgical procedures performed at Role 2 and Role 3 MTFs; the majority of procedures were eye (40.54%) and airway (18.50%). These data can be used as planning tools to help determine the medical footprint and also to help inform training and sustainment requirements for deployed military general surgeons especially if future contingency operations are more constrained in terms of resources and personnel., (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2022. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.)

Introduction: Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) is the execution of prehospital trauma skills in the combat environment. TCCC was recognized by the 2018 Department of Defense Instruction on Medical Readiness Training as a critical wartime task. This study examines the training, understanding, and utilization of TCCC principles and guidelines among US Army medical providers and examines provider confidence of medics in performing TCCC skills., Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey, developed by members of the Committee on TCCC, was distributed to all US Army Physicians and Physician Assistants via anonymous electronic communication., Results: A total of 613 completed surveys were included in the analyses. Logistic regression analyses were conducted on: TCCC test score of 80% or higher, confidence with medic utilization of TCCC, and medic utilization of ketamine in accordance with TCCC., Conclusions: <60% of respondents expressed confidence in the ability of the medics to perform all TCCC skills. Supervising providers who that believed 80 to 100% of their medics had completed TCCC training had more confidence in their medic's TCCC abilities. With TCCC, a recognized lifesaver on the battlefield, continued training and utilization of TCCC concepts are paramount for deploying personnel., (© Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Orthopedic surgery constitutes 27% of procedures performed for combat injuries. General surgeons may deploy far forward without orthopedic surgeon support. This study examines the type and volume of orthopedic procedures during 15 years of combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan., Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of the US Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) was performed for all Role 2 and Role 3 facilities, from January 2002 to May 2016. The 342 ICD-9-CM orthopedic surgical procedure codes identified were stratified into fifteen categories, with upper and lower extremity subgroups. Data analysis used Stata Version 14 (College Station, TX)., Results: A total of 51,159 orthopedic procedures were identified. Most (43,611, 85.2%) were reported at Role 3 s. More procedures were reported on lower extremities (21,688, 57.9%). Orthopedic caseload was extremely variable throughout the 15-year study period., Conclusions: Orthopedic surgical procedures are common on the battlefield. Current dispersed military operations can occur without orthopedic surgeon support; general surgeons therefore become responsible for initial management of all injuries. Debridement of open fracture, fasciotomy, amputation and external fixation account for 2/3 of combat orthopedic volume; these procedures are no longer a significant part of general surgery training, and uncommonly performed by general/trauma surgeons at US hospitals. Given their frequency in war, expertise in orthopedic procedures by military general surgeons is imperative., (© Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2019. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has specific limitations in theater and has unique requirements for its safe use with patients which require additional technician training and strict adherence to MRI-specific safety protocols. Neuroimaging is recommended for the evaluation of service members with clinical red flags new onset or persistent or worsening symptoms, and individuals whose recovery is not progressing as anticipated. This article is a brief discussion of when MRI is appropriate.

Combat extremity injury and amputation is a life threatening injury. Initial surgical care should focus on hemostasis followed by irrigation and debridement of contaminated and nonviable tissue. Preservation of limb length begins at the initial surgical procedure, to include retention of atypical soft tissue flaps for later reconstruction and treatment of proximal fractures. Serial irrigation and debridements are required throughout the MEDEVAC system as the evolving zone of injury becomes more mature, followed by the appropriate timing of closure outside the combat theater.

A catastrophic brain injury is defined as any brain injury that is expected to result in permanent loss of all brain function above the brain stem level. These clinical recommendations will help stabilize the patient so that they may be safely evacuated from theater. In addition to cardiovascular and hemodynamic goals, special attention must be paid to their endocrine dysfunction and its treatment-specifically steroid, insulin and thyroxin (t4) replacement while evaluating for and treating diabetes insipidus. Determining the futility of care coupled with resource management must also be made at each echelon. Logistical coordination and communication is paramount to expedite these patients to higher levels of care so that there is an increased probability of reuniting them with their family.

Management of wartime burn casualties can be very challenging. Burns frequently occur in the setting of other blunt and penetrating injuries. This clinical practice guideline provides a manual for burn injury assessment, resuscitation, wound care, and specific scenarios including chemical and electrical injuries in the deployed or austere setting. The clinical practice guideline also reviews considerations for the definitive care of local national patients, including pediatric patients, who are unable to be evacuated from theater. Medical providers are encouraged to contact the US Army Institute of Surgical Research (USAISR) Burn Center when caring for a burn casualty in the deployed setting.

While combat-related pelvis fractures are more commonly open, higher energy, and complex in pattern than those seen in the civilian setting, the principles of management are similar. The primary differences are related to the austere setting in which the initial management takes place, and the lack of resources typically available. Initial management consists of cessation of hemorrhage, along with the multi-disciplinary prioritized management of associated injuries, and skeletal stabilization. This is most commonly achieved with a compressive sheet or pelvic binder, with pelvic external fixation when resources allow, and debridement of open wounds as necessary. Definitive, internal fixation is delayed until the patient arrives at a higher echelon of care.

Acute compartment syndrome (CS) is a frequent and potentially devastating complication of blunt and penetrating extremity injuries. Extremity war injuries are particularly susceptible to CS due to associated vascular injuries; high Injury Severity Score; extensive bone and soft tissue injury; and frequent transportation that may limit close monitoring of the injured extremity. Treatment consists of prompt fasciotomy of all compartments in the involved segment, over their full length. Delayed or incomplete fasciotomy is associated with worse outcomes, including muscle necrosis, infection, and amputation. Enhanced pre-deployment training of surgeons decreases the need for revision fasciotomy at higher echelons of care and should be continued in future conflicts. We recommend the liberal use of prophylactic fasciotomy prior to aeromedical evacuation and after limb reperfusion. For leg fasciotomy, we recommend a two-incision approach as it is more reproducible and allows easy vascular exposure when necessary.

High, combat-related bilateral lower extremity amputations rarely occur in isolation. Dismounted complex blast injury is a devastating and life-threatening constellation of multisystem injuries most commonly due to dismounted contact with improvised explosive devices. Rapid damage control resuscitation and surgery are essential to improve patient survival and minimize both early complications and late sequelae. A coordinated team approach is essential to provide simultaneous airway management, volume resuscitation (ideally with whole blood or ratio transfusion), and immediate control of life-threatening hemorrhage. Temporary aortic or iliac vessel clamping during concurrent exploratory or vascular control laparotomy is frequently required. Stabilization of unstable pelvic fractures is then performed, followed by debridement and irrigation of all wounds, which should be left open, and subsequent provisional stabilization of long bone fractures. The goal of the initial surgical resuscitative endeavor is rapid concurrent control of all sources of hemorrhage to avoid the lethal triad of acidosis, hypothermia and coagulopathy. To this end, multiple surgeons or surgical teams should be utilized whenever feasible. Patients then require ongoing resuscitation followed by early and frequent return to the operating suite throughout the evacuation chain. Utilizing this approach, a high survival rate with reasonable functional outcomes is achievable despite the extreme severity of the DCBI pattern.

The purpose of this Clinical Practice Guide is to provide details on the procedures to safely remove unexploded ordnance from combat patients, both loose and impaled, to minimize the risks to providers and the medical treatment facility while ensuring the best outcome for the patient. Military ordnance, to include bullets, grenades, flares, and explosive ordnance, retained by a patient can be a risk to all individuals and equipment along the continuum of care. This is especially true from the point of injury to the first treatment facility. Management of patients with unexploded ordnance either on or in their body is a rare event during combat surgery. Loose munitions are usually noted and easily removed prior to the patient receiving medical treatment. However, impaled munitions provide a significant challenge. These are usually caused by large caliber, high-velocity projectiles. Patients who survive to arrive at a treatment facility must be triaged safely and simultaneously treated appropriately to ensure both the survival of the patient and the treatment team. Between WWII and the Somalia conflict, there have been 36 reported cases of unexploded ordnance from U.S. soldiers. Since 2005, there have been six known cases during the U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and one additional case in Pakistan. Optimal outcomes require a basic knowledge of explosives and triggering mechanisms, as well as adherence to basic principles of trauma resuscitation and surgery.

Acute kidney injury is a recognized complication of combat trauma. The complications associated with acute kidney injury, such as life-threatening hyperkalemia, are usually delayed in onset. In the recent conflicts, rapid evacuation of U.S. and coalition personnel generally resulted in these complications occurring at higher echelons of care where renal replacement therapies were available. In the future however, deployed providers may not have this luxury and should be prepared to temporize patients while they await transport. In this clinical practice guideline, recommendations are made for the management of patients with, or at risk for, acute kidney injury and hyperkalemia in the austere, deployed environment.

Resuscitative thoracotomy has been extensively described in the civilian trauma literature and has a high mortality rate, due largely to the nature of the injuries leading to arrest. The survival rates are generally highest (10-30%) for penetrating truncal injuries and patients who arrive with vital signs and proceed to arrest or who have impending arrest. They are significantly lower (less than 5%) for blunt trauma victims, particularly those who arrest in the field or during transport (1% or less). In addition, the likelihood of survival with intact neurologic function is significantly lower than the overall survival rates, particularly for blunt trauma victims and for prehospital arrest.

Critically injured trauma patients benefit from timely transport and care. Accordingly, the provision of rapid transport and effective treatment capabilities in appropriately close proximity to the point of injury will optimize time and survival. Pre-transport tactical combat casualty care, rapid transport with en route casualty care, and advanced damage control resuscitation and surgery delivered early by small, mobile, forward-positioned Role 2 medical treatment facilities have potential to reduce morbidity and mortality from trauma. This retrospective review and descriptive analysis of trauma patients transported from Role 1 entities to Role 2 facilities in Afghanistan from 2008 to 2014 found casualties to be diverse in affiliation and delivered by various types and modes of transport. Air medical evacuation provided transport for most patients, while the shortest transport time was seen with air casualty evacuation. Although relatively little data were collected for air casualty evacuation, this rapid mode of transport remains an operationally important method of transport on the battlefield. For prehospital care provided before and during transport, continued leadership and training emphasis should be placed on the administration and documentation of tactical combat casualty care as delivered by both medical and non-medical first responders.

Introduction: In 2006, burn clinical practice guidelines were developed to provide recommendations for optimal care of U.S. military and local national burn casualties. As part of that effort, a paper-based Burn Flow Sheet (BFS) was included to document the burn resuscitation of combat casualties with ≥20% total body surface area burns. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the BFS in terms of ongoing utilization, resuscitation management, and outcomes of patients transported., Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed of hard-copy BFSs received from January 2007 to December 2013. En route injury and treatment data from these flowsheets were manually transcribed into the research database. Outcomes and complications of BFS subjects were extracted from the Burn Center Registry and added to the research database., Results: A total of 73 BFSs were collected from the study period. On average, BFSs were 61 ± 30% complete with a total of 14.7 ± 7 hours documented per patient in the first 24-hours postburn. Patients received nearly 7 L more fluid than estimated by traditional formulas. Sixteen patients (26%) received greater than 250 mL/kg of fluid, half of whom had concomitant traumatic injuries. Fifteen patients received a fasciotomy (21%), 4 received a laparotomy (5%), and 8 (11%) received both. No patients developed abdominal compartment syndrome associated with fluid resuscitation. Overall mortality was 21%., Conclusions: Although the majority of providers did initiate a BFS, it was not always used as intended; problems included missing data and miscalculations. Although there was a clear improvement with decline in the incidence of abdominal compartment syndrome, mortality did not change for severely burned patients. Simplification of the recommendations, additional built-in prompts, and automated tools such as computerized decision support software may help standardize practice and improve outcomes., (Reprint & Copyright © 2017 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.)

Objectives: Military personnel risk injury due to accidents, disasters, and military threats during Phase Zero "shaping" operations. Medical facilities must be poised to respond., Methods: The U.S. Pacific Command (PACOM) Area of Responsibility (AOR) covers more than 50% of the earth's surface; relevant Clinical Practice Guidelines must include the maritime setting and extended evacuation periods. Military hospitals in the region are not connected by a defined Trauma System. There is variable adherence to trauma training requirements before assignment in this AOR. Demand for trauma care at any 1 location is low and trauma teams have little opportunity to maintain competency for high-risk/low-volume interventions. There is no documentation of total demand for trauma care in the AOR. Trauma care in PACOM is often deferred to civilian facilities., Results: Core elements of a Joint Theater Trauma System (JTTS) as established during combat operations in U.S. Central Command are applicable during Phase Zero. A PACOM JTTS was established to address the region's readiness to respond to Phase Zero trauma as well as escalation of regional threats. Information technology coordination was a critical hurdle to overcome., Conclusion: PACOM lessons learned are applicable to other Geographic Combatant Commands developing a JTTS during Phase Zero operations., (Reprint & Copyright © 2017 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.)

Despite its near-universal use, few data exist to support the efficacy of prehospital supplemental oxygen (PH O2) in trauma patients. Data were reviewed from 5,090 patients not requiring assisted ventilation who were transported to our level I trauma center. Of these, 2,203 (43.3%) received PH O2 and 2,887 (56.7%) did not. Patients who received PH O2 had higher mortality than those without PH O2 (2.3% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.011). When corrected for Injury Severity Score, mechanism of injury, and age, those receiving PH O2 fared worse or no better than those who did not receive it. This suggests that supplemental oxygen does not improve survival in traumatized patients who are not in respiratory distress. This has implications for the management of casualties in combat or austere environments.

Splenic rupture is an uncommon complication of infectious mononucleosis (IM), occurring in 0.1% to 0.5% of all patients. It remains the most common lethal complication of IM. Rupture of the spleen with no other symptoms of IM is almost unheard of. This is the report of a case of spontaneous splenic rupture requiring splenectomy in a patient with a positive heterophil antibody test and no other signs or symptoms of IM. The diagnosis and management of splenic rupture in IM are discussed.