Search

Introduction: When warfighters are unable to fight, they are formally removed from battle through temporary or permanent duty limitation profiles. This study uses a population-based data repository to characterize permanent behavioral health (BH)-related profiles across the army for an identified 2-year period. The absolute risk of a permanent duty limitation for specific BH categories was also examined., Materials and Methods: This study utilized a retrospective population-based design to identify all new BH diagnoses across the U.S. Army. Service members identified as having a new BH diagnosis were tracked for 12 months following the diagnosis to determine the recommendation of a permanent duty limitation profile., Results: From 2017 to 2018, 16% (n = 102,440) of service members received a "new" BH diagnosis. Less than 10% (9.5%; n = 9,752) of soldiers diagnosed with a BH disorder were issued a permanent BH-related duty profile within 12 months of the initial diagnosis. The absolute risk of a permanent profile was highest for soldiers diagnosed with a psychotic or delusional disorder (42%; n = 324) followed by dissociative or somatoform disorders (26%; n = 178) and eating disorders (23%; n = 108)., Conclusions: Military regulations dictating medical readiness and retention standards reflect both the standards required for mission readiness and a layer of medical protection for the service member. This study provides important information on the relationship between a new BH diagnosis and the likelihood that a service member will be referred for a retirement evaluation., (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2023. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.)

Introduction: Less than half of service members with a behavioral health (BH) problem seek care. Soldiers may avoid seeking needed care because of concerns related to being placed on a duty-limiting profile and the related medical disclosures that follow., Materials and Methods: This study used a retrospective population-based design to identify all new BH diagnoses across the U.S. Army. The relationship between diagnostic category, risk of being issued a duty limitation (profile), and time until return to full duty was also examined. Data were collected from a comprehensive data repository that includes medical and administrative records. Soldiers with a new BH diagnosis were identified from 2017 to 2018. All duty limitation profiles within 12 months of initial diagnosis were identified., Results: Records for 614,107 unique service members were reviewed. This cohort was mostly male, enlisted, unmarried, and White. The mean age was 27.13 years (SD = 8.05). Soldiers with a new BH diagnosis accounted for 16.7% (n = 102,440) of the population. The most common diagnostic category was adjustment disorder (55.7%). About a quarter (23.6%) of soldiers with a new diagnosis were issued a related profile. The mean length of these profiles was 98.55 days (SD = 56.91). Of those with a new diagnosis, sex and race failed to have an effect on the odds of being placed on a profile. Overall, enlisted, unmarried, or younger soldiers had greater odds of being placed on a profile., Conclusion: These data provide relevant information for both the service member who seeks care and command teams seeking readiness projections., (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2023. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.)

Introduction: Neuromusculoskeletal injuries (NMSKIs) are the primary cause of ambulatory visits, lost duty days, and disability discharges in the U.S. Military. Methods for accurately grouping injury diagnoses are required to allow for surveillance and research identifying risk factors and prevention strategies. The CDC method of grouping these diagnoses includes only the S and T codes (Injury, poisoning, and certain other consequences of external causes) from the ICD-10-CM. However, this does not include the majority of the NMSKI depleting soldier readiness; the M (Disease of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue) and G (Diseases of the nervous system) codes should be included as these also contain injuries. The goal was to develop a new matrix that would comprehensively capture all NMSKIs experienced by military personnel. This paper details the development of the Occupational Military Neuromusculoskeletal Injury (OMNI) Matrix and characterizes the number and rates of active duty U.S. Army injuries as measured by the OMNI compared to other matrices., Materials and Methods: A team of researchers including physical therapists, physician assistants, occupational therapists, physicians, and epidemiologists developed the OMNI. The OMNI utilizes the commonly accepted injury definition inclusive of any anatomical complaint resulting in pain or dysfunction and categorizes injuries from the G, M, S, and T codes. The OMNI follows the CDC's matrix structure with three body region levels, each becoming more specific, and adds two levels called Description of the Injury. Additionally, the OMNI categorizes injuries as Injury Type (Acute, Overuse, Either, or Not Applicable), NMSKI-Type (NMSKI, NMSKI that could be caused by occupational/training tasks, and not an NMSKI), and a miscellaneous category that demarks injuries as Superficial, Blood Vessels, and/or Internal Organs. The different grouping methods in the OMNI provide standardization for many possible injury case definitions. The OMNI allows these injury categories to be included/excluded in a standardized fashion to meet the researchers' scientific questions. To enumerate the number of NMSKI that would be captured by the available matrices, the OMNI, the CDC's matrix, and the U.S. Army Public Health Center's (APHC) Taxonomy of Injuries were applied to active duty Army outpatient population data and all incident NMSKI diagnostic codes entered in electronic medical provider encounters for calendar years 2017 and 2018., Results: Using the OMNI resulted in the capture of over 800,000 more injuries than the CDC's matrix and over 200,000 more than the APHC Taxonomy. The NMSKI rate utilizing the OMNI was 193 per 100 soldier-years in 2017 (892,780 NMSKI) compared to 23 per 100 soldier-years for the CDC's matrix, and 141 per 100 soldier-years for the APHC Taxonomy., Conclusion: The OMNI provides an updated standardized method of assessing injuries, particularly in occupational military injury research, that can be utilized for Military Performance Division of injury across many countries and still allow for replication of methods and comparison of results. Additionally, the OMNI has the capacity to capture a greater burden of injury beyond what is captured by other available matrices., (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2021. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.)

Introduction: Neuromusculoskeletal injuries (MSKI) are the leading cause of medical encounters, lost or limited duty days, medical evacuations, and disability in the U.S. Army. In the U.S. Army, objective MSKI incidence rate metrics can be determined through medical encounter data (M2SKIs) with International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9 and ICD 10 codes or through documented limited duty profiles (LDPs) documenting time-loss MSKI (TLMSKI). The purpose of the current study was to characterize the population incidence of TLMSKIs among U.S. Army soldiers., Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the Medical Research and Development Command's Institutional Review Board. This was a retrospective population-level study. The U.S. Army's eProfile system was utilized to characterize all LDPs issued during 2017-2018 and to describe the body regions injured and activities associated with these TLMSKIs., Results: The incidence rate of TLMSKIs was found to be 44 and 40 TLMSKI/100 soldier-years for 2017 and 2018, respectively, which is lower than previously published incidence rates using MSKI receiving medical care. Approximately one quarter of the total active duty Army population in 2017 and 2018 recorded limited duty injuries, where those to the ankle/foot region resulted in the most LDPs and those to the knee resulted in the most lost duty days. The majority of all TLMSKIs were associated with fitness training-related activities., Conclusion: This descriptive study is the first to present the U.S. Army population rates for MSKIs that result in LDPs, representing key time losses when soldiers cannot participate in their military occupational and physical training tasks. This study utilizes the LDP system to calculate limited duty days instead of attempting to estimate this information from other means. The eProfile system is limited in that it combines body regions such as ankle/foot and does not allow isolation of ankle or foot independently. It is recommended that research and training programs target the identification, development, and validation of effective and scaleable strategies to maximize performance without severely reducing combat effectiveness because of training TLMSKIs., (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2021. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.)

The purpose of this prospective cohort study was to investigate physical, occupational, and psychosocial risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries (MSI) in deployed female soldiers. Before deployment, participants completed performance testing and surveys and after deployment an additional survey detailing occupational demands and MSI. Data analyzed found 57/160 (36%) suffered 78 MSI. In unadjusted analyses, these factors increased the relative risk (RR, 95% confidence interval) of injury: wearing an average load >10% body weight (BW) (RR = 2.00, 1.31-4.57), wearing an average load >1 hour (RR = 2.44, 1.30-4.57), heaviest load worn >15% BW (RR = 5.83, 1.51-22.50), wearing a backpack (RR = 1.82, 1.23-2.80), wearing body armor >1 hour (RR = 1.62, 1.002-2.62), lifting objects weighing above 22.68 kg (RR = 1.96, 1.08-3.57), lifting objects one to two times (RR = 1.73, 1.002-2.97), carrying objects >7.62 m (RR = 2.01, 1.19-3.42), and Y Balance composite score <95.23 (RR = 1.71, 1.13-2.60). The best logistic regression model predicting MSI was average load as % BW (odds ratio [OR] = 1.04, 1.01-1.07), heaviest load as % BW (OR = 1.03, 1.01-1.05), average repetitions lifting objects (OR = 1.07, 1.01-1.14), and sit-ups (OR = 0.93, 0.93-0.99). Results indicate that risk of MSI in deployed female soldiers increased with heavier equipment worn and more repetitious lifting, although more performing more sit-ups on the fitness test before deployment reduced the risk., (Reprint & Copyright © 2016 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.)

Each year musculoskeletal injuries (MSIs) result in thousands of lost duty days and medical discharges. Women represent 15% of the Army and have higher incidence of injury than male soldiers; studies that have investigated MSIs in deployed women are lacking. Therefore, the purpose of this prospective cohort study was to investigate MSIs in women during a 9-month deployment to Afghanistan. Participants were recruited from three Brigade Combat Teams. Participants completed a demographic survey before deployment and a second survey on occupational demands and MSIs after deployment. Of the 160 women, 57 (36%) suffered 78 MSIs resulting in 1,642 days of limited duty, a median of 7 days per MSI, losing 10% of the available duty time to MSIs. Most injuries affected the knee (24%) or low back (18%). Soldiers attributed the majority of injuries (27%) to physical training and trips/falls (17%). Of the MSIs, 93% caused limitations to physical training and 76% resulted in large limitations to occupational tasks. Most MSIs (41%) resolved within 3 weeks and most (37%) occurred before the fourth month of deployment. Prevention measures should target knee and low back injuries. Physical training should be further investigated to discover modifications capable of reducing injuries., (Reprint & Copyright © 2015 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.)

Musculoskeletal injuries (MSIs) are the most common cause of ambulatory visits in the deployed setting. Research done on deployed populations have focused mostly on men. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to describe physical demands and MSIs among male and female soldiers in a Brigade Combat Team during a 12-month deployment to Afghanistan. Data on occupational tasks and injuries were collected from the infantry and brigade support battalions. Out of 57 women, 22 had MSIs (39%) and for the 536 men, 120 (22%) had MSIs resulting in limited duty. The average limited duty was 7.5 and 13 days/injury for women and men, respectively. The most commonly injured body region for the men was the low back (32%) and the low back (22%) and foot and ankle (22%) for women. The activity associated with MSI for women was physical training (25%) and for men it was contact with the enemy (23%). Physically demanding duties, more distance walked, and heavier average load and objects lifted all increased the risk of injury in women. Only lifting heavier weights increased the risk in men. The women appear to have less tolerance to physically demanding work such than their male counterparts., (Reprint & Copyright © 2015 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.)

Musculoskeletal injuries (MSIs) result in the most medical encounters, lost duty days, and permanent disability. Women are at greater risk of injury than men and physical training is the leading cause of injury. The purpose of this study was to investigate the demographic, body composition, fitness, and physical training risk factors for injuries in female Soldiers serving in garrison Army units over the past 12 months. Self-report survey was collected from 625 women. The ankle was the most frequently injured body region, 13%. Running was the activity most often associated with injury, 34%. In univariate analysis lower rank, older age, history of deployment, no unit runs, weekly frequency of personal resistance training, and history of injury were all associated with injury. In multivariate analysis rank, history of injury, weekly frequency of unit runs, and weekly frequency of personal resistance training were the best combination of predictors of injury. Running once or twice a week with the unit protected against MSIs, whereas participating in personal resistance training sessions once or twice a week increased the risk of MSIs. With more emphasis on running and resistance training, the U.S. Army could reduce injuries and save billions of dollars in training and health care costs., (Reprint & Copyright © 2014 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.)

Soldiers must perform a variety of physical tasks that the civilian population does not. The Modified Oswestry Disability Index (M-ODI) is the most widely used measure of function in patients with low back pain but does not include military tasks. The Military Low Back Pain Questionnaire (MBQ) was developed by military Physical Therapists to include tasks such as wearing body armor. The purpose of this study was to provide preliminary evidence for the reliability, responsiveness, and validity of the MBQ in nondeployed Soldiers. The MBQ had good reliability compared to the M-ODI. The inter-rater correlation coefficient for the M-ODI was 0.79 and 0.75 for the MBQ. Cronbach's alpha was 0.75 and 0.85 for the M-ODI and MBQ, respectively. The minimal detectable change for the M-ODI was 21.03 and 22.97 for the MBQ. Responsiveness was assessed using a global rating of change; area under the curve for the M-ODI was 0.82 and 0.90 for the MBQ. The correlation between the M-ODI and the MBQ was r = 0.80 indicating good concurrent validity. The MBQ was as reliable as the M-ODI in an Army population. There were trends in the psychometrics suggesting the MBQ may be more sensitive to change than the M-ODI in this population., (Reprint & Copyright © 2014 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.)

With deployment Soldiers must now wear body armor and additional equipment while performing occupational tasks, representing a large demand that has not been considered when studying military occupations. The purpose of this study was to: (1) describe tasks required by different occupational battalions within a Brigade Combat Team; (2) establish the incidence of low back pain (LBP) in each battalion and; (3) determine which tasks predict LBP within the different battalions. This was a prospective cohort study investigating 805 Soldiers in a Brigade Combat Team deployed to Afghanistan for 1 year. Demographic, occupational, and fitness variables were recorded. There was no difference in time spent on fitness training between the battalions. Occupational tasks performed by deployed Soldiers vary in the level of physical demand between battalions. Infantry had the highest fitness score (257); wore the heaviest equipment (70 lb.); spent the most time wearing body armor (49 hours/week), performing dismounted patrol (29 hours/week), and lifting objects (35 hours/week); spent the least amount of time working at a desk (14 hours/week); but had a similar incidence of LBP (77%) compared to other battalions. History of LBP and time spent wearing body armor were the two most consistent predictors of LBP across battalion types., (Reprint & Copyright © 2013 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.)

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), a principal injury of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, can result in significant morbidity. To make accurate return-to-duty decisions for soldiers with mTBI, military medical personnel require sensitive, objective, and duty-relevant data to characterize subtle cognitive and sensorimotor injury sequelae. A military-civilian research team reviewed existing literature and obtained input from stakeholders, end users, and experts to specify the concept and develop a preliminary assessment protocol to address this need. Results of the literature review suggested the potential utility of a test based on dual-task and multitask assessment methods. Thirty-three individuals representing a variety of military and civilian stakeholders/experts participated in interviews. Interview data suggested that reliability/validity, clinical feasibility, usability across treatment facilities, military face validity, and capacity to challenge mission-critical mTBI vulnerabilities were important to ultimate adoption. The research team developed the Assessment of Military Multitasking Performance, a tool composed of eight dual and multitasking test-tasks. A concept test session with 10 subjects indicated preliminary face validity and informed modifications to scoring and design. Further validation is needed. The Assessment of Military Multitasking Performance may fill a gap identified by stakeholders for complex cognitive/motor testing to assist return-to-duty decisions for service members with mTBI., (Reprint & Copyright © 2013 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.)

U.S. Army soldiers spend months at a time working in austere environments during deployments. The numerous physical demands placed on them during deployment can lead to musculoskeletal injuries. These injuries account for the majority of medical evacuations and lost duty days, seriously affecting mission readiness. Because of limited electronic injury data, little research has been done on physical demands associated with injury in deployed environments. To this end, this study conducted a survey on 263 soldiers in a Stryker Brigade Combat Team during their third month of deployment to Afghanistan. In the third month, 23% sustained an injury and 43% of injuries affected the low-back, shoulder, or knee. Dismounted patrolling and lifting were reported to account for 36% of injuries. Wearing heavy loads and lifting tasks were identified as injury risk factors. Wearing heavier equipment and lifting objects higher may increase physical demands and may result in injury.

Unlabelled: Musculoskeletal injuries are the most common cause for disability in deployed environments. Current research is limited to body region affected by the injury., Objective: To determine the prevalence of musculoskeletal diagnoses and mechanisms of injury (MOI) as well as associations to specific Military Occupational Specialties (MOS) in a deployed Brigade Combat Team (BCT)., Methods: Data collected on 3,066 patient encounters by the Brigade Combat Team physical therapist over 15 months were analyzed using descriptive statistics and X2 tests., Results: Mechanical low back pain was the most common diagnosis (19%), whereas overuse was the most prevalent MOI (22%). The Infantry MOS was significantly associated with meniscal tears and pre-existing injuries, the Maintenance MOS with contusions, Signal and Transportation MOSs with weight lifting injuries, and the Administrative MOS with running injuries., Conclusion: Different MOSs are preferentially susceptible to different diagnoses and MOIs. Therefore, different injury prevention strategies may be needed across occupations.