Search

Background and Hypothesis: Isolated Tubulitis, Borderline Changes, and Isolated Arteritis suspicious for histologic T cell-mediated rejection (hTCMR) remain findings of uncertain significance. Although the Molecular Microscope Diagnostics System (MMDx) has not been trained on those lesions, it was suggested that MMDx might reclassify a subgroup to molecular TCMR (mTCMR)., Methods: In this single-center cohort of 326 consecutive, unselected kidney allograft biopsies assessed by histology and MMDx, we analyzed 249 cases with Isolated Tubulitis (i0, t1-3, v0; n=101), Borderline Changes (according to Banff 2022, v0; n=9), Isolated Arteritis (no borderline, v1; n=37), No Inflammation (i0, t0, v0; n=67) and a Positive Control Cohort (hTCMR, n=27; Mixed histologic Rejection, n=8; both according to Banff 2022; total n=35). The first three groups were summarized as TCMR-Suspicion (n=147). Subcategorization included the presence and absence of microvascular inflammation (MVI; g+ptc≥2). Molecular rejection rates and differentiation were investigated., Results: Molecular rejection rates were 37/147 cases (25.2%; 32 with MVI) in TCMR-Suspicion, 6/67 (9%; 4 with MVI) in No Inflammation and 30/35 (85.7%; 19 with MVI) in the Positive Control Cohort. Molecular antibody-mediated rejection (mAMR) was present in 39/73 (53.4%) of cases. The presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) at the time of the biopsy was high (127/249, 51%). Only 3 mAMR/TCMR and no pure mTCMR cases were detected in TCMR-Suspicion and No Inflammation, compared to 12 mAMR/TCMR and 10 mTCMR cases in the Positive Control Cohort (p<0.001). Even though the TCMR-specific molecular (Classifier) score differentiated between TCMR-Suspicion and No Inflammation (p=0.005), rejection phenotype scores (R2 and R3) did not (p=0.157 and 0.121)., Conclusions: MMDx did not identify pure mTCMR among Isolated Tubulitis, Borderline Changes, or Isolated Arteritis, likely due to low sensitivity for TCMR-lesions. However, it identified mAMR or mAMR/TCMR, especially in cases with MVI. Subthreshold findings remain to be further studied., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Background: Despite substantial improvements in short-term kidney allograft survival, median long-term survival remains at a standstill. It is unclear whether and to what extent a transplant centre's post-transplant care influences long-term outcomes., Methods: We retrospectively analysed 501 single kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who underwent transplantation between 2009 and 2018 and did not develop rejection or de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) within the first post-transplant year. After that, KTRs were either followed exclusively every 3 months by the transplant centre ( n  = 197) or every 3 months by local nephrologists ( n  = 304) with only yearly follow-up by the transplant centre. We analysed kidney allograft outcomes regarding estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline, proteinuria, development of dnDSA and rejection., Results: No differences between the two groups were observed in the baseline characteristics and the characteristics at the end of the first post-transplant year ( P  > .05). KTRs followed by local nephrologists were comparable to KTRs followed by the transplant centre concerning patient survival ( P  = .541), kidney allograft survival ( P  = .385), eGFR decline ( P  = .488), progression of proteinuria ( P  > .05), the development of dnDSA ( P  = .335) and T-cell-mediated rejection ( P  = .480). KTRs followed by the transplant centre were more likely to undergo indication biopsies in case of allograft dysfunction and dnDSA ( P  < .001). Antibody-mediated rejection was diagnosed earlier and more frequently ( P  = .059), recurrent glomerulonephritis was diagnosed earlier and more frequently ( P  = .026) and immunosuppression was modified earlier and more frequently in response to histological findings ( P  = .038)., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that close collaboration between local nephrologists and the transplant centre ensures good allograft outcomes independent of the caregiver. Greater biopsy activity in the transplant centre allows for earlier diagnosis of allograft dysfunction as the basis for novel treatment options., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Background: Cancer risk is increased by 2- to 4-fold in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) compared with the general population. Little attention, however, has been given to KTRs with ultra long-term survival >20 years., Methods: We studied 293 of 1241 KTRs (23.6%), transplanted between 1981 and 1999, who showed kidney allograft survival >20 years. These long-term survivors were analysed for cancer development, cancer type, cancer-associated risk factors and patient and allograft outcomes., Results: By 10, 20 and 30 years post-transplantation, these long-term KTRs showed a cancer rate of 4.4%, 14.6% and 33.2%, and a non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) rate of 10.3%, 33.5% and 76.8%, respectively. By recipients' ages of 40, 60 and 80 years, KTRs showed a cancer rate of 3.4%, 14.5% 55.2%, and a NMSC rate of 1.7%, 31.6% and 85.2%, respectively. By 30 years post-transplantation, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) showed the highest incidence of 8.5%, followed by renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with 5.1%. Risk factors associated with the development of cancer were only recipient age (P = 0.016). Smoking history was associated with the risk of lung cancer (P = 0.018). Risk factors related to the development of NMSC included recipient age (P = 0.001) and thiazide diuretics (P = 0.001). Cancer increased the risk of death by 2.4-fold (P = 0.002), and PTLD increased the risk of kidney allograft loss by 6.5-fold (P = 0.001). No differences were observed concerning the development of donor-specific antibodies (P > 0.05)., Conclusions: In long-term KTRs, cancer is a leading cause of death. PTLD remains the most common cancer type followed by RCC. These results emphasize the need for focused long-term cancer surveillance protocols., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Background: Improved understanding and assessment of the complex physiology of volume regulation in haemodialysis (HD) patients are required to improve patient care and reduce mortality associated with fluid overload (FO)., Methods: We searched for FO-related biomarkers among 184 peptides associated with cardiovascular disease in a cohort of 30 HD patients. First, we assessed the direct impact of HD on the peptides of interest by comparing plasma concentrations before and after treatment. Then, we compared cardiovascular peptide profiles between patients with and without FO as defined by bioimpedance analysis (BIA). The plasma concentration of selected candidate biomarkers for FO was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and correlated with previously described FO-related clinical and laboratory parameters. For validation, results were confirmed in an independent cohort of 144 HD patients., Results: We found seven peptides positively [NT-proBNP, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), vascular endothelial growth factor D (VEGFD), tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 2, growth differentiation factor 15, tumour necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 13B, chitinase-3-like protein 1] and five negatively (leptin, renin, epidermal growth factor receptor, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, myeloblastin) correlated to FO. In addition to natriuretic peptides, VEGFD emerged as third peptide highly correlated with BIA (ρ = 0.619, P < 0.0001). In line with this, VEGFD concentration verified by ELISA correlated with BIA, BNP and soluble CD146 but not with vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGFC). Notably, levels of VEGFD were unrelated to cardiac systolic function (P = 0.63), contrary to BNP (P = 0.0003). Finally, we observed that 1-year all-cause mortality was higher in patients with high BNP (P = 0.0002), FO (defined by BIA, P = 0.04) and high VEGFD (P = 0.02), but not with high VEGFC (P = 0.48)., Conclusion: VEGFD is a novel FO-related biomarker with unique diagnostic and prognostic properties., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.)

Background: Accurate volume status evaluation and differentiation of cardiac and non-cardiac components of overhydration (OH) are fundaments of optimal haemodialysis (HD) management., Methods: This study, by combining bioimpedance measurements, cardiovascular biomarkers and echocardiography, aimed at dissecting OH into its major functional components, and prospectively tested the association between cardiac and non-cardiac components of OH with mortality. In the first part, we validated soluble CD146 (sCD146) as a non-cardiac biomarker of systemic congestion in a cohort of 30 HD patients. In the second part, we performed a prospective 1-year follow-up study in an independent cohort of 144 HD patients., Results: sCD146 incrementally increased after the short and long intervals after HD (+53 ng/mL, P = 0.006 and  +91 ng/mL, P < 0.001), correlated with OH as determined by bioimpedance and well-diagnosed OH (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.72, P = 0.005). The prevalence of OH was lower for low-sCD146 and low-BNP patients (B-type natriuretic peptide, 29%) compared with subjects with either one or both biomarkers elevated (65-74%, P < 0.001). Notably, most low-BNP but high-sCD146 subjects were overhydrated. Systolic dysfunction was 2- to 3-fold more prevalent among high-BNP compared with low-BNP patients (44-68% versus 21-23%, chi-square P < 0.001), regardless of sCD146. One-year all-cause mortality was markedly higher in patients with high-BNP (P = 0.001) but not with high-sCD146. In multivariate analysis, systolic dysfunction and BNP, but not OH, were associated with lower survival., Conclusions: The combination of BNP and sCD146 dissects OH into functional components of prognostic value. OH in HD patients is associated with higher mortality only if resulting from cardiac dysfunction.