Search

Background: Pregnant people with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) experience higher risk for severe disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes, but no pharmacokinetic (PK) data exist to support dosing of COVID-19 therapeutics during pregnancy. We report PK and safety data for intravenous remdesivir in pregnancy., Methods: IMPAACT 2032 was a phase 4 prospective, open-label, nonrandomized opportunistic study of hospitalized pregnant and nonpregnant women receiving intravenous remdesivir as part of clinical care. Intensive PK sampling was performed on infusion days 3, 4, or 5 with collection of plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Safety data were recorded from first infusion through 4 weeks after last infusion and at delivery. Geometric mean ratios (GMR) (90% confidence intervals [CI]) of PK parameters between pregnant and nonpregnant women were calculated., Results: Fifty-three participants initiated remdesivir (25 pregnant; median gestational age, 27.6 weeks; interquartile range, 24.9-31.0 weeks). Plasma exposures of remdesivir, its 2 major metabolites (GS-704277 and GS-441524), and the free remdesivir fraction were similar between pregnant and nonpregnant participants. Concentrations of the active triphosphate (GS-443902) in PBMCs increased 2.04-fold (90% CI, 1.35-3.03) with each additional infusion in nonpregnant versus pregnant participants. Three adverse events in nonpregnant participants were related to treatment (1 grade 3; 2 grade 2 resulting in treatment discontinuation). There were no treatment-related adverse pregnancy outcomes or congenital anomalies detected., Conclusions: Plasma remdesivir PK parameters were comparable between pregnant and nonpregnant women, and no safety concerns were identified based on our limited data. These findings suggest no dose adjustments are indicated for intravenous remdesivir during pregnancy., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT04582266., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. K. M. B. has received consulting fees from ViiV Healthcare. K. B. has received research support from Gilead Sciences, Inc and ViiV Healthcare paid to her institution. D. S. has received research support from Gilead Sciences, Inc, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare paid to his institution. A. A. serves on scientific advisory boards for Gilead Sciences, Inc and ViiV Healthcare; is a site principal investigator for a multisite and investigator-initiated studies with Gilead Sciences, Inc; and is a consultant for Merck. E. V. C. is serving on a data and safety monitoring board for Melinta Pharmaceuticals. D. E. Y. was previously an unpaid technical advisor for the nonprofit Cover the Globe and Maipelo Trust. M. M. has received research support from Gilead Sciences, Inc, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare paid to his institution. R. H. and K. K. are employees of Gilead Sciences, Inc and hold stock in the company. J. D. M. has received research support from Gilead Sciences, Inc paid to his institution. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To develop a pragmatic twice daily lamivudine dosing strategy for preterm infants from 24 to 37 completed weeks of gestation., Methods: Data were combined from eight pharmacokinetic studies in neonates and infants receiving lamivudine oral solution. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using non-linear mixed effects regression. Different lamivudine dosing strategies, stratified by gestational age at birth (GA) bands, were simulated in a virtual population of preterm infants, aimed at maintaining lamivudine drug exposures (AUC0-12) within a reference target range of 2.95 to 13.25 µg·h/mL, prior to switching to WHO-weight band doses when ≥4 weeks of age and weighing ≥3 kg., Results: A total of 154 infants (59% female) contributed 858 lamivudine plasma concentrations. Median (range) GA at birth was 38 (27-41) weeks. At the time of first pharmacokinetic sampling infants were older with median postnatal age (PNA) of 6.3 (0.52-26.6) weeks. Lamivudine concentrations were described by a one-compartment model, with CL/F and V/F allometrically scaled to weight. Maturation of CL/F was described using an Emax model based on PNA. CL/F was also adjusted on GA to allow extrapolation for extreme prematurity. Simulations predicted an optimal lamivudine dosing for infants GA ≥24 to <30 weeks of 2 mg/kg twice daily from birth until weighing 3 kg; and for GA ≥30 to <37 weeks, 2 mg/kg twice daily for the first 4 weeks of life, followed by 4 mg/kg twice daily until weighing 3 kg., Conclusions: Model-based predictions support twice daily pragmatic GA band dosing of lamivudine for preterm infants, but clinical validation is warranted., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Long-acting antiretroviral products have the potential to transform human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention and treatment approaches in pediatric populations. Broadly neutralizing antibodies and/or long-acting antiretroviral formulations by injection could dramatically improve provision of HIV prophylaxis and/or early treatment to newborns and infants at risk of HIV infection. Challenges in daily oral antiretroviral administration to toddlers and school age children living with HIV may be relieved by use of long-acting formulations, but the pharmacokinetics and safety of these products in children must be studied before they can enter routine clinical use. Although some initial studies of broadly neutralizing antibodies and injectable long-acting agents in infants and young children are underway, more studies of these and other long-acting products are needed. For many adolescents, compliance with daily medication administration is especially challenging. Long-acting products hold particular promise for adolescents living with HIV as well as those at high risk of HIV acquisition, and adolescents can usually be included in the drug development pipeline simultaneously with adults. Long-acting products have the potential to provide alternatives to lifelong daily oral drug administration across the pediatric age spectrum, leading to more effective prevention and treatment of HIV infection in infants, children, and adolescents., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. E. J. A. served on the advisory board for the clinical trial eDMC MK-1439-066 without remuneration. E. C. reports serving on the data safety monitoring boards for Melinta Pharmaceuticals and Celtrion and holds stock with Sorrento Therapeutics. M. M. reports research funding to their institution from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead Sciences, and Merck; consulting fees from Merck; and serving on a data safety monitoring board for AstraZeneca. T. R. has no conflicts to report. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Isoniazid (INH) metabolism depends on the N-acetyl transferase 2 (NAT2) enzyme, whose maturation process remains unknown in low birth weight (LBW) and preterm infants. We aimed to assess INH exposure and safety in infants receiving oral tuberculosis prevention., Methods: This population pharmacokinetics (PK) analysis used INH and N-acetyl-isoniazid (ACL) concentrations in infants (BW ≤ 4 kg), including preterm, with follow-up for 6 months. PK parameters were described using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Simulations were performed to assess INH exposure and optimal dosing regimens, using 2 targets: Cmax at 3-6 mg/L and area under the curve (AUC) ≥ 10.52 mg h/L., Results: We included 57 infants (79% preterm, 84% LBW) in the PK analysis, with a median (range) gestational age of 34 (28.7-39.4) weeks. At the time of sampling, postnatal age was 2.3 (0.2-7.3) months and weight (WT) was 3.7 (0.9-9.3) kg. NAT2 genotype was available in 43 (75.4%) patients (10 slow, 26 intermediate, and 7 fast metabolizers). Ninety percent of NAT2 maturation was attained by 4.4 post-natal months. WT, postmenstrual age, and NAT2 genotype significantly influenced INH exposure, with a 5-fold difference in AUC between slow and fast metabolizers for the same dose. INH appeared safe across the broad range of exposure for 61 infants included in the safety analysis., Conclusions: In LBW/preterm infants, INH dosing needs frequent adjustment to account for growth and maturation. Pharmacogenetics-based dosing regimens is the most powerful approach to deliver safe and equalized exposures for all infants, because NAT2 genotype highly impacts INH pharmacokinetic variability., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. M. C. received honorariums from ViiV Healthcare for a lecture at ViiV interest meeting. M. M. received grant supports from ViiV Healthcare, Merck & Co, and Gilead Sciences. A. V. is a member of the DSMB for Janssen for a pediatric trial funded by Janssen and received some grants for work done for MSD and Gilead Sciences. E. V. C. participated in the DSMB for Celltrion. J. M. reports being a US ­government employee during the conduct of the study. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Only a few antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) are recommended for use during the neonatal period and there is a need for more to be approved to increase treatment and prophylaxis strategies. Dolutegravir, a selective integrase inhibitor, has potential for treatment of HIV infection and prophylaxis of transmission in neonates., Objectives: To model the pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir in neonates and to simulate a theoretical optimal dosing regimen., Methods: The physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was built incorporating the age-related changes observed in neonates. Virtual neonates between 0 and 28 days were simulated. The model was validated against observed clinical data for raltegravir and midazolam in neonates, prior to the prediction of dolutegravir pharmacokinetics., Results: Both raltegravir and midazolam passed the criteria for model qualification, with simulated data within 1.8-fold of clinical data. The qualified model predicted the pharmacokinetics for several multidose regimens of dolutegravir. Regimen 6 involved 5 mg doses with a 48 h interval from Day 1-20, increasing to 5 mg once daily on Week 3, yielding AUC and Ctrough values of 37.2 mg·h/L and 1.3 mg/L, respectively. These exposures are consistent with those observed in paediatric patients receiving dolutegravir., Conclusions: Dolutegravir pharmacokinetics were successfully simulated in the neonatal PBPK model. The predictions suggest that during the first 3 weeks of life a 5 mg dose administered every 48 h may achieve plasma exposures needed for therapy and prophylaxis., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency issued warnings on the use of dolutegravir and darunavir/cobicistat for treatment of pregnant women living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). It took 3-5 years to identify the risks associated with the use of these antiretroviral drugs, during which time pregnant women were exposed to these drugs in clinical care, outside of controlled clinical trial settings. Across all antiretroviral drugs, the interval between registration of new drugs and first data on pharmacokinetics and safety in pregnancy becoming available is around 6 years. In this viewpoint, we provide considerations for clinical pharmacology research to provide safe and effective treatment of pregnant and breastfeeding women living with HIV and their children. These recommendations will lead to timelier availability of safety and pharmacokinetic information needed to develop safe treatment strategies for pregnant and breastfeeding women living with HIV, and are applicable to other chronic disease areas requiring medication during pregnancy., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Darunavir 800 mg once (q24h) or 600 mg twice (q12h) daily combined with low-dose ritonavir is used to treat HIV-positive pregnant women. Decreased total darunavir exposure (17%-50%) has been reported during pregnancy, but limited data on unbound exposure are available., Objectives: To evaluate total and unbound darunavir exposures following standard darunavir/ritonavir dosing and to explore the value of potential optimized darunavir/ritonavir dosing regimens for HIV-positive pregnant women., Patients and Methods: A population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted based on data from 85 women. The final model was used to simulate total and unbound darunavir AUC0-τ and Ctrough during the third trimester of pregnancy, as well as to assess the probability of therapeutic exposure., Results: Simulations predicted that total darunavir exposure (AUC0-τ) was 24% and 23% lower in pregnancy for standard q24h and q12h dosing, respectively. Unbound darunavir AUC0-τ was 5% and 8% lower compared with post-partum for standard q24h and q12h dosing, respectively. The probability of therapeutic exposure (unbound) during pregnancy was higher for standard q12h dosing (99%) than for q24h dosing (94%)., Conclusions: The standard q12h regimen resulted in maximal and higher rates of therapeutic exposure compared with standard q24h dosing. Darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg q12h should therefore be the preferred regimen during pregnancy unless (adherence) issues dictate q24h dosing. The value of alternative dosing regimens seems limited., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Tuberculosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in women of childbearing age (15-44 years). Despite increased tuberculosis risk during pregnancy, optimal clinical treatment remains unclear: safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic data for many tuberculosis drugs are lacking, and trials of promising new tuberculosis drugs exclude pregnant women. To advance inclusion of pregnant and postpartum women in tuberculosis drug trials, the US National Institutes of Health convened an international expert panel. Discussions generated consensus statements (>75% agreement among panelists) identifying high-priority research areas during pregnancy, including: (1) preventing progression of latent tuberculosis infection, especially in women coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus; (2) evaluating new agents/regimens for treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis; and (3) evaluating safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of tuberculosis drugs already in use during pregnancy and postpartum. Incorporating pregnant women into clinical trials would extend evidence-based tuberculosis prevention and treatment standards to this special population., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: To describe the pharmacokinetics of maraviroc in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected women during pregnancy and post partum., Methods: HIV-infected pregnant women receiving maraviroc as part of clinical care had intensive steady-state 12-hour pharmacokinetic profiles performed during the third trimester and ≥2 weeks after delivery. Cord blood samples and matching maternal blood samples were taken at delivery. The data were collected in 2 studies: P1026 (United States) and PANNA (Europe). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated., Results: Eighteen women were included in the analysis. Most women (12; 67%) received 150 mg of maraviroc twice daily with a protease inhibitor, 2 (11%) received 300 mg twice daily without a protease inhibitor, and 4 (22%) had an alternative regimen. The geometric mean ratios for third-trimester versus postpartum maraviroc were 0.72 (90% confidence interval, .60-.88) for the area under the curve over a dosing interval (AUCtau) and 0.70 (0.58-0.85) for the maximum maraviroc concentration. Only 1 patient showed a trough concentration (Ctrough) below the suggested target of 50 ng/mL, both during pregnancy and post partum. The median ratio of maraviroc cord blood to maternal blood was 0.33 (range, 0.03-0.56). The viral load close to delivery was <50 copies/mL in 13 women (76%). All children were HIV negative at testing., Conclusions: Overall maraviroc exposure during pregnancy was decreased, with a reduction in AUCtau and maximum concentration of about 30%. Ctrough was reduced by 15% but exceeded the minimum Ctrough target concentration. Therefore, the standard adult dose seems sufficient in pregnancy., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT00825929 and NCT000422890., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To assess the influence of body weight and missed doses on lopinavir pharmacokinetics with standard and increased doses of lopinavir/ritonavir melt extrusion tablets during late pregnancy., Patients and Methods: Lopinavir concentration data during the third trimester of pregnancy were pooled from clinical trials in Thailand (NCT00409591) and the USA (NCT00042289). A total of 154 HIV-infected pregnant women receiving either 400/100 mg (standard) or 600/150 mg (increased) twice daily had lopinavir plasma concentration data available. Population parameters were estimated using non-linear mixed-effects regression models. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate the probability of achieving target lopinavir trough concentrations (>1.0 mg/L) with standard and increased doses of lopinavir/ritonavir during pregnancy., Results: The median (range) age, weight and gestational age were 28 years (18-43), 62 kg (45-123) and 33 weeks (29-38), respectively. Body weight influenced lopinavir oral clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V/F). Population estimates of lopinavir CL/F and V/F were 6.21 L/h/70 kg and 52.6 L/70 kg, respectively. Based on simulations, the highest risk of subtherapeutic trough concentrations was for women weighing >100 kg using the standard dose (∼ 7%), while the risk was <2% with the 600/150 mg dose for women weighing 40-130 kg. After a missed dose, 61% of women have lopinavir concentrations below target prior to the next dose with the standard dose compared with 42% with the increased dose., Conclusions: Standard dosing provides adequate lopinavir trough concentrations for the majority of pregnant women but increased doses may be preferable for women weighing >100 kg and with a history of lopinavir/ritonavir use and/or adherence issues., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Clinical pharmacology studies that describe the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs in pregnant women are critical for informing on the safe and effective use of drugs during pregnancy. That being said, multiple factors have hindered the ability to study drugs in pregnant patients. These include concerns for maternal and fetal safety, ethical considerations, the difficulty in designing appropriate trials to assess the study objectives, and funding limitations. This document summarizes the recommendations of a panel of experts convened by the Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health. These experts were charged with reviewing the issues related to the development of preclinical and clinical drug studies in pregnant women and to develop strategies for addressing these issues. These findings may also be utilized in the development of future drug studies involving pregnant women and their fetus/neonate., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Intrapartum single-dose (SD) nevirapine (NVP) reduces perinatal transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection but selects for NVP-resistant virus, which compromises subsequent NVP-based therapy. A 1-week "tail" of lamivudine and zidovudine after SD-NVP decreases the risk of resistance. We hypothesized that increasing the duration or potency of the tail would further reduce this risk to <10%, using a sensitive assay to measure resistance., Methods: HIV-infected pregnant Thai women with a CD4 cell count >250 cells/μL, most receiving zidovudine, were randomized at 28-38 weeks gestation to receive 1 of 3 intrapartum and postpartum regimens: (A) zidovudine plus enteric-coated didanosine plus lopinavir and ritonavir for 7 days, (B) zidovudine plus enteric-coated didanosine for 30 days, or (C) regimen 1 for 30 days. The incidence of NVP resistance mutations at day 10 or week 6 post partum in each arm was compared with that of a historical comparison group who received prenatal zidovudine and SD-NVP. NVP resistance was identified by consensus sequencing and a sensitive oligonucleotide ligation assay (OLA)., Results: At entry, the 169 participants had a median CD4 cell count of 456 cells/μL and an HIV load of 3.49 log(10) copies/mL. The incidence of mutations in each of the 3 P1032 arms was 0% by sequencing and 1.8%, 7.1%, and 5.3% by OLA in arms A, B, and C, respectively, compared with 13.4% by sequencing and 29.4% by OLA in the comparison group (P < .001 for each study arm vs comparison group). Grade 4 anemia developed in 1 woman., Conclusions: A 7-day tail of highly active combination therapy or 1 month of dual therapy after SD-NVP prevents most NVP resistance to minimal toxicity., Clinical Trials Registration: The IMPAACT P1032 Clinical Trial is NCT00109590, and the PHPT-2 Clinical Trial is NCT00398684.

Background: The magnitude of infant antiretroviral (ARV) exposure from breast milk is unknown., Methods: We measured concentrations of nevirapine, lamivudine, and zidovudine in serum and whole breast milk from human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected women in Botswana receiving ARV treatment and serum from their uninfected, breast-feeding infants., Results: Twenty mother-infant pairs were enrolled. Maternal serum concentrations of nevirapine were high (median, 9534 ng/mL at a median of 4 h after nevirapine ingestion). Median breast-milk concentrations of nevirapine, lamivudine, and zidovudine were 0.67, 3.34, and 3.21 times, respectively, those in maternal serum. The median infant serum concentration of nevirapine was 971 ng/mL, at least 40 times the 50% inhibitory concentration and similar to peak concentrations after a single 2-mg/kg dose of nevirapine. The median infant serum concentration of lamivudine was 28 ng/mL, and the median infant serum concentration of zidovudine was 123 ng/mL, but infants were also receiving zidovudine prophylaxis., Conclusions: HIV-1 inhibitory concentrations of nevirapine are achieved in breast-feeding infants of mothers receiving these ARVs, exposing infants to the potential for beneficial and adverse effects of nevirapine ingestion. Further study is needed to understand the impact of maternal ARV treatment on breast-feeding HIV-1 transmission, infant toxicity, and HIV-1 resistance mutations among infected infants.

The bioequivalence of a proprietary liquid dapsone preparation and commercially available dapsone tablets was studied. Twelve adult volunteers received dapsone doses with 8 oz of water one to two hours after their usual breakfast. Each subject received an initial 100-mg dose of a propylene glycol-based liquid preparation of dapsone and, two weeks later, a 100-mg dapsone tablet (both from Jacobus Pharmaceutical Company, Princeton, NJ). Blood samples were collected before and at intervals up to 96 hours after the administration of each dose. Serum dapsone concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, and pharmacokinetic values were calculated by model-independent analysis. The area under the concentration-versus-time curve and the maximum serum concentration for the two formulations met the criteria for bioequivalence. Time to maximum serum concentration tended to be lower for the liquid, but not significantly. The liquid and tablet formulations of dapsone studied were found to be bioequivalent and may be used interchangeably.

The safety, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of intrapartum and early newborn nevirapine were evaluated in 17 human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected women in labor and their newborns. No adverse effects of nevirapine were noted in any study mothers or infants. Following maternal dosing with 200 mg during labor, concentrations exceeding 100 ng/mL (10 times the in vitro IC50) were achieved in the newborns. Nevirapine elimination was prolonged in both mothers and infants, with median half-lives ranging from 36.8 to 65.7 h. Administration of 200 mg orally to the mothers in labor and of a single 2-mg/kg oral dose to the infants at 48-72 h after birth maintained serum concentrations in the infants > 100 ng/mL through 7 days of life.