Drucker AM, Lam M, Elsawi R, Prieto-Merino D, Malek R, Ellis AG, Yiu ZZN, Rochwerg B, Di Giorgio S, Arents BWM, Burton T, Spuls PI, Schmitt J, and Flohr C
Background: Systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD) are evaluated primarily in placebo-controlled trials with binary efficacy outcomes. In a living systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA), we previously analysed continuous efficacy measures., Objectives: To compare binary efficacy outcomes of systemic treatments for AD., Methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information (LILACS) database, Global Resource for Eczema Trials (GREAT) database and trial registries up to 1 March 2023. We included randomized trials examining ≥ 8 weeks of treatment with systemic immunomodulatory medications for moderate-to-severe AD. We screened titles, abstracts and full texts and abstracted data independently, in duplicate. Outcomes included the proportion of patients achieving at least 50%, 75% and 90% improvements in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 50, EASI 75 and EASI 90, respectively) and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) success. We performed random-effects Bayesian NMAs to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) between each intervention for each outcome., Results: Eighty-three trials with 22 122 participants were included in the systematic review. In analyses limited to trials of 8-16 weeks' duration with predominantly adult populations, abrocitinib 200 mg daily (OR 1.5, 95% CrI 1.1-2.2) and upadacitinib 15 mg daily (OR 1.7, 95% CrI 0.9-3.3) and 30 mg daily (OR 2.5, 95% CrI 1.3-5.0) were associated with higher odds of achieving EASI 50 vs. dupilumab. Abrocitinib 100 mg daily (OR 0.7, 95% CrI 0.5-1.0), baricitinib 2 mg daily (OR 0.4, 95% CrI 0.3-0.5) and 4 mg daily (OR 0.5, 95% CrI 0.3-0.7), and tralokinumab (OR 0.4, 95% CrI 0.3-0.6) were associated with lower odds of achieving EASI 50 vs. dupilumab. Results were similar for EASI 75, EASI 90 and IGA success., Conclusions: Supporting results for continuous outcome measures, upadacitinib 30 mg daily and abrocitinib 200 mg daily are the most efficacious with regard to binary efficacy endpoints up to 16 weeks in adults with moderate-to-severe AD, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg daily, dupilumab and abrocitinib 100 mg daily. Dupilumab and both doses of upadacitinib and abrocitinib are more efficacious than baricitinib 4 and 2 mg daily and tralokinumab., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interests A.M.D. has received compensation from the British Journal of Dermatology (Section Editor), American Academy of Dermatology (guidelines writer), National Eczema Association (grant reviewer) and Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (consultant); and has received research grants to his institution from the National Eczema Association, Eczema Society of Canada, Canadian Dermatology Foundation, Canadian Institutes for Health Research, US National Institutes of Health and Physicians Services Incorporated Foundation. A.G.E. is an employee of Stratevi, a healthcare consultancy that receives financial compensation from numerous pharmaceutical companies; Stratevi was not involved with the submitted work. Z.Z.N.Y. is an Associate Editor for the British Journal of Dermatology. B.W.M.A. is a Patient Associate Editor for the British Journal of Dermatology. P.I.S. has consulted for Sanofi and AbbVie (unpaid), was Principal Investigator (PI) of the Methotrexate vs. Azathioprine for severe Atopic Dermatitis (MAcAD) study, received departmental independent research grants for the TREAT NL registry, for which she is Chief Investigator (CI), from pharma companies since December 2019, and is involved in performing clinical trials with Sanofi, Pfizer, AbbVie, Novartis, Leo Pharma and Galderma, for which financial compensation is paid to the department/hospital. J.S. received institutional funding for investigator-initiated trials from Novartis, Sanofi, Pfizer and ALK; has received fees for consulting from Novartis and Pfizer; and is co-PI of the German national AD registry TREATgermany, which is funded by Sanofi Aventis Deutschland, Galderma, LEO Pharma and Lilly Deutschland. C.F. is CI of the UK National Institute for Health Research-funded TREAT (ISRCTN15837754) and SOFTER (NCT03270566) trials, as well as the UK–Irish Atopic eczema Systemic Therapy Register (A-STAR; ISRCTN11210918) and a PI in the European Union (EU) Horizon 2020-funded BIOMAP Consortium (http://www.biomap-imi.eu/). He also leads the EU Trans-Foods consortium. His department has received funding from Sanofi-Genzyme and Pfizer for skin microbiome work. He has also received compensation from the British Journal of Dermatology (Section Editor) and EuroGuiDerm (guidelines lead). M.L., R.E., D.P.-M., R.M., T.B. and B.R. declare no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.)