1. Impact of Different Sampling Schemes for Decision Making in Soil-Transmitted Helminthiasis Control Programs.
- Author
-
Coffeng LE, Malizia V, Vegvari C, Cools P, Halliday KE, Levecke B, Mekonnen Z, Gichuki PM, Sayasone S, Sarkar R, Shaali A, Vlaminck J, Anderson RM, and de Vlas SJ
- Subjects
- Datasets as Topic, Feces parasitology, Helminthiasis epidemiology, Helminthiasis parasitology, Humans, Parasite Egg Count, Preventive Health Services, Sensitivity and Specificity, Specimen Handling, Decision Making, Helminthiasis prevention & control, Helminthiasis transmission, Soil parasitology
- Abstract
Starting and stopping preventive chemotherapy (PC) for soil-transmitted helminthiasis is typically based on the prevalence of infection as measured by Kato-Katz (KK) fecal smears. Kato-Katz-based egg counts can vary highly over repeated stool samples and smears. Consequentially, the sensitivity of KK-based surveys depends on the number of stool samples per person and the number of smears per sample. Given finite resources, collecting multiple samples and/or smears means screening fewer individuals, thereby lowering the statistical precision of prevalence estimates. Using population-level data from various epidemiological settings, we assessed the performance of different sampling schemes executed within the confines of the same budget. We recommend the use of single-slide KK for determining prevalence of moderate-to-heavy intensity infection and policy decisions for starting and continuing PC; more sensitive sampling schemes may be required for policy decisions involving stopping PC. Our findings highlight that guidelines should include specific guidance on sampling schemes., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF