Search

OBJECTIVES Epicardial adipose tissue volume (EAT-V) has been linked to atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences after catheter ablation. We retrospectively studied the association between atrial EAT-V and outcome after hybrid AF ablation (epicardial surgical and endocardial catheter ablation). METHODS On preoperative cardiac computed tomography angiography scans, the left atrium and right atrium were manually delineated using the open source ImageJ. With custom-made automated software, the number of pixels in the regions of interest on each slice was calculated. On the basis of the Hounsfield units, pixel size and slice thickness, EAT-V was computed and normalized in relation to the body surface area (BSA) and the myocardial tissue volume. RESULTS Eighty-five patients were included. Left atrial and right atrial EAT-V normalized to BSA were not significantly different between paroxysmal and persistent AF [0.84 (0.51–1.50) vs 0.81 (0.57–1.18), 1.74 (1.02–2.56) vs 1.55 (1.26–2.18), all P = 0.9], neither between the acute conduction block and no acute conduction block in the epicardial box lesion [0.92 (0.55–1.39) vs 0.72 (0.55–1.24), P = 0.5, right atrium not applicable], nor between the sinus rhythm and arrhythmia recurrence after 12 months [0.88 (0.55–1.48) vs 0.63 (0.47–1.10), 1.61 (1.11–2.50) vs 1.55 (1.20–2.20), all P > 0.1]. Left atrial EAT-V normalized to myocardial tissue volume was not different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS This study could neither confirm that EAT-V was predictive of recurrence of supraventricular arrhythmias in patients undergoing a hybrid AF ablation, nor that EAT-V was different between patients with paroxysmal AF and persistent and long-standing persistent AF. This suggests that EAT-V might not affect the outcome in surgical ablation procedures and therefore should not influence preoperative or intraoperative decision-making.

The efficacy and safety of thoracoscopic atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting have been previously reported. Herein, we describe the successful combination of both procedures in a high-risk patient with symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal AF and a proximal left main stenosis. This innovative procedure offers patients an all-in-one, truly minimally invasive approach to treat AF and left anterior descending artery disease. Based on our initial experience, the procedure is safe and feasible.

Aims Surgical ablation performed concomitantly with cardiac surgery has emerged as an effective curative strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF). Left atrial (LA) lesion sets for ablation have been suggested to reduce procedural times and post-surgical bradycardia compared with biatrial (BA) lesions. Given the inconclusive literature regarding BA vs. LA ablation, the present meta-analysis sought to assess the current evidence. Methods and results Electronic searches were performed using six databases from their inception to December 2013, identifying all relevant randomized trials and observational studies comparing BA vs. LA surgical ablation AF patients undertaking cardiac surgery. In 10 included studies, 2225 patient results were available for analysis to compare BA ( n = 888) vs. LA ( n = 1337) ablation. Sinus rhythm prevalence was higher in the BA cohort compared with the LA cohort at 6-month and 12-month follow-up, but similar beyond 1 year. Permanent pacemaker implantations were higher in the BA cohort, but 30-day and late mortality, neurological events, and reoperation for bleeding were similar between BA and LA groups. Conclusions Biatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates. Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year, but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 year. Trends appear to be driven by the preferential selection of long-standing and persistent AF patients for the BA approach. Future randomized studies of adequate follow-up are required to validate risks and benefits of BA vs. LA surgical ablation.

Aims The purpose of this study was to analyse the efficacy and complication rates of the simultaneous hybrid procedure in a series of patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in a midterm follow-up. Methods and results Sixty-four consecutive patients (56 males, 59.7 ± 8.7 years) having undergone isolation of pulmonary veins (PVs) and posterior wall of left atrium (LA) by means of hybrid thoracoscopic ablation for symptomatic persistent ( n = 21, 33%) and long-standing persistent AF ( n = 43, 67%) were analysed. At a mean follow-up of 23.1 ± 14.1 months (median 21; range 6–57), the success rate without antiarrhythmic therapy was achieved in 67.2% of patients. Procedure-related complications were observed in 13 patients (20.3%) including 2 LA perforations (3.1%) requiring, respectively, conversion to sternotomy and small left-sided thoracotomy. The success rate did not significantly differ between persistent and long-standing persistent AF (respectively, 71.4 and 65.1%; P = 0.4). Patients with AF relapse during the blanking period were 4.60 times more likely to have AF recurrence after 3 months from the ablation procedure. Conclusion The hybrid procedure yields promising results in the setting of both persistent and long-standing persistent AF after midterm follow-up, at the expense of a non-negligible rate of adverse events. Our findings need to be confirmed by further larger and prospective studies.

The hybrid approach combines an epicardial ablation with a percutaneous endocardial ablation in a single-step or sequential procedure. This study provides an overview of the hybrid procedure for the treatment of stand-alone atrial fibrillation (AF). Papers selected for this review were identified on PubMed and the final selection included nine studies. The total number of patients was 335 (range 15-101). Mean age ranged from 55.2 to 62.9 years. The hybrid approach achieved satisfactory results, with AF-antiarrhythmic drug-free success rates higher than those in isolated procedures. In particular, the bilateral approach with a bipolar device showed a high success rate independently of the AF type and seems to be the better choice for the hybrid procedure. Despite good preliminary results, large, multicentre trials of hybrid AF ablation that target a population of patients with long-standing persistent disease are necessary to establish whether this approach may represent, in the future, a gold-standard treatment for AF.

Minimally invasive atrial fibrillation surgery (MIAFS) has become a well established and increasingly used option for managing patients with stand-alone arrhythmia. Pulmonary veins (PVs) isolation continues to be the cornerstone of ablation strategies. Indeed, in most cases, atrial fibrillation (AF) is triggered in or near the PVs. Nevertheless, ectopic beats initiating AF may occasionally arise from non-PV foci. The knowledge of the anatomy and underlying morphology of PVs and non-PV foci is essential for cardiac surgeons treating AF patients with epicardial minimally invasive procedures. The anatomical structures relevant to the pathogenesis and the epicardial treatment of AF include the PVs, the pericardial space, the pericardial sinuses, the phrenic nerve, the left atrium, the retro-atrial and caval ganglionated plexuses, the ligament of Marshall, the caval veins and the left atrial appendage. In this review, we briefly describe the basic anatomy of these structures and discuss their specific correlations for cardiac surgeons interested in performing MIAFS.

A 62-year-old male was admitted to the emergency department of our centre because of recurrent episodes of palpitations and dizziness. The patient had a history of severe blunt chest trauma with multiple rib fractures (5–10th) due to a tractor fall 2 years before. The electrocardiographic tracing at admission showed ( Panel A ) a wide QRS tachycardia with the right …