Search

Context: Childhood diet is hypothesized to influence development of chronic disease in adulthood., Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the long-term effects of a dietary intervention to reduce fat and increase fiber intake during childhood and adolescence on the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in young adult women., Design: A follow-up study was conducted in 2006-2008, 9 yr after termination of the Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC)., Setting: The study took place at six DISC clinical centers in the United States., Participants: A total of 230 (76%) DISC female participants who were 25-29 yr old and had not been pregnant or breastfeeding in the previous 3 months participated in the follow-up study., Intervention: There was no intervention between the end of the DISC trial and the follow-up visit., Main Outcome Measure: Metabolic syndrome was the primary study endpoint planned before data collection and was hypothesized to be less common in the intervention group participants., Results: Metabolic syndrome was uncommon, and its prevalence did not differ by treatment group. However, after adjustment for nondietary variables, mean systolic blood pressures of intervention and control group participants were 107.7 and 110.0 mm Hg, respectively (P = 0.03), whereas mean fasting plasma glucose levels were 87.0 and 89.1 mg/dl, respectively (P = 0.01). Intervention group participants also had lower concentrations of large very-low-density lipoprotein particles, a marker of hepatic insulin resistance, compared with control group participants. Adjustment for current diet did not materially alter results., Conclusion: Consumption of a diet lower in fat and higher in fiber during childhood and adolescence may benefit glycemic control and blood pressure long term.

Context: Diet reportedly alters serum sex hormone concentrations in adults, but little is known about the influence of diet during puberty on these hormones., Objective: We aimed to determine whether an intervention to lower fat intake during adolescence alters serum sex hormone concentrations and progression through puberty., Design: In 1990-1997, we conducted an ancillary study to the Dietary Intervention Study in Children, a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial to test the safety and efficacy of a cholesterol-lowering dietary intervention in children., Participants: Healthy, prepubertal, 8 to 10 yr olds with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were randomized to usual care or a behavioral intervention. Of 362 randomized Dietary Intervention Study in Children boys, 354 participated in the ancillary study. Eighty-four percent of boys attended last visits when their median time on trial was 7.1 yr., Intervention: The behavioral intervention continued throughout the duration of the trial and promoted a diet with 28% energy from total fat, less than 8% from saturated fat, 9% or less from polyunsaturated fat, and less than 75 mg cholesterol per 1000 kcal., Outcome Measures: The main outcome measure for boys formulated before study initiation was non-SHBG bound testosterone concentration. Secondary outcomes included serum total testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, androstenedione, estradiol, estrone, SHBG, and Tanner stage., Results: There were no significant treatment group differences in boys' serum hormone levels, SHBG, or Tanner stages at any individual visit or over the course of the trial when evaluated by longitudinal models., Conclusion: Modest reductions in total fat, saturated fat, and possibly energy intake do not alter progression through puberty or serum sex hormone concentrations in adolescent boys.

Background: Results of several studies have suggested that diet during adolescence may influence the risk of breast cancer in adulthood. We evaluated whether an intervention to lower fat intake among adolescent girls altered their serum concentrations of sex hormones that, in adults, are related to breast cancer development., Methods: We conducted an ancillary hormone study among 286 of the 301 girls who participated between 1988 and 1997 in the Dietary Intervention Study in Children, in which healthy, prepubertal, 8- to 10-year-olds with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were randomly assigned to usual care or to a behavioral intervention that promoted a low-fat diet. Median time on the intervention was 7 years. Blood samples collected before randomization and at the year 1, year 3, year 5, and last visits were assayed to determine the girls' serum levels of sex hormones. All P values are two-sided., Results: At the year 5 visit, girls in the intervention group had 29.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.4% to 47.9%; P =.02) lower estradiol, 30.2% (95% CI = 7.0% to 47.7%; P =.02) lower non-sex hormone binding globulin-bound estradiol, 20.7% (95% CI = 4.7% to 34.0%; P =.02) lower estrone, and 28.7% (95% CI = 5.1% to 46.5%; P =.02) lower estrone sulfate levels during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle and 27.2% (95% CI = 5.7% to 53.1%; P =.01) higher testosterone levels during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle than did girls in the usual care group. At the last visit, the luteal phase progesterone level was 52.9% (95% CI = 20.0% to 72.3%) lower for girls in the intervention group than for girls in the usual care group (P =.007)., Conclusion: Modest reductions in fat intake during puberty are associated with changes in sex hormone concentrations that are consistent with alterations in the function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis. Whether these changes influence breast cancer risk is currently unknown.

Behavior pattern was assessed by interview for 3,110 men at eight centers in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (1973-1976). The Type A pattern was not significantly associated with risk of first major coronary events (coronary death and definite nonfatal myocardial infarction) after a mean follow-up of 7.1 years. Crude relative risks for Types A1-A2 versus X-B were 1.08 in usual care, 0.82 in special intervention, and 0.92 overall. Adjustment for age, blood pressure, cigarette smoking, serum cholesterol, consumption of alcohol, and educational attainment yielded relative risks of 0.99 in usual care, 0.81 in special intervention, and 0.87 overall (95% confidence interval = 0.59-1.28). The Jenkins Activity Survey Type A score, obtained for 12,772 men at all 22 centers, was also not significantly associated with risk of first major coronary events. Overall, crude risks in the lowest (Type B) through highest (Type A) quintiles of the score's distribution were 5.0%, 4.4%, 4.0%, 4.3%, and 4.1%, respectively. The proportional hazards regression coefficient, adjusted for the variables listed above, was -0.006 (95% confidence interval = -0.015-0.003). These results raise questions regarding the robustness of the Type A hypothesis in its present form. Further studies are needed to investigate these questions and to evaluate the validity of procedures used to assess behavior patterns.