Search

Occasionally, obtaining an adequate or acceptable postmortem blood specimen for drug analysis is not possible due to factors such as decomposition, exsanguination, or embalming. Submandibular salivary gland tissue, one of three major types of salivary gland tissue in the oral cavity of humans, has been reported to be a viable alternative postmortem specimen for toxicological testing. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the Randox Evidence Investigator instrument and Randox DOA (Drugs of Abuse) Ultra Whole Blood Array for the semi-quantitative determination of 21 immunoassays in an alternative matrix, submandibular salivary gland tissue. We analyzed 132 submandibular salivary gland tissue specimens and compared the generated results to concomitantly collected postmortem whole blood specimen results. Oxycodone 2, meprobamate, barbiturate, benzodiazepine assay 1, zolpidem, and buprenorphine all showed perfect agreement (Cohen's kappa score = 1.00) between the submandibular salivary gland tissue results and the postmortem whole blood results; dextromethorphan, fentanyl, benzoylecgonine, methamphetamine, tricyclic antidepressants, oxycodone 1, and opiate showed an almost perfect agreement (Cohen's kappa score = 0.81-0.99); methadone, generic opioids, and amphetamine exhibited substantial agreement (Cohen's kappa score = 0.61-0.80). Tramadol demonstrated fair agreement (Cohen's kappa score = 0.41-0.60). The lowest measure of agreement was observed with cannabinoids, meeting criteria for slight agreement (Cohen's kappa score = 0.01-0.20). An application of the techniques described in this study could be implemented in postmortem toxicology laboratories as well as medical examiners offices to provide preliminary drugs of abuse test results that can be used to direct additional testing. This study highlights the successful integration of a novel specimen matrix and an "off-label" use of an established analytical technique., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site–for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: The Elecsys® syphilis immunoassay is an automated, qualitative immunoassay that uses a double-antigen sandwich format to detect antibodies to Treponema pallidum in human serum and plasma. We aimed to validate performance of the immunoassay in various populations at risk for syphilis infection in the US and Argentina., Methods: Samples were obtained for a number of study cohorts, including participants from routine syphilis testing at high or low risk for syphilis, HIV-positive patients, pregnant women, and patients in various stages of syphilis infection. The primary objective was to validate the Elecsys syphilis immunoassay by comparing it with a composite testing algorithm using US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved tests, including the predicate IMMULITE 2000 syphilis screening assay, the rapid plasma reagin, and the T. pallidum particle agglutination assay., Results: Complete algorithm testing was performed on all 2660 collected samples. Acceptable precision was demonstrated in all samples. Comparison of the Elecsys syphilis immunoassay with the final syphilis status for all samples yielded a diagnostic sensitivity of 99.5% (95% CI, 98.21-99.94) and a diagnostic specificity of 99.2% (95% CI, 98.69-99.49). Overall, the lower limit of the 95% CIs for sensitivity and specificity met the expected performance of ≥95%., Conclusion: This is the first study that confirms the high sensitivity and specificity of the Elecsys syphilis immunoassay in US and Argentinian cohorts and highlights the assay's usefulness as an alternative to current tests for the diagnosis of syphilis infection in a broad range of participant cohorts., (© 2018 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.)