1. A Simple Standard for Sharing Ontological Mappings (SSSOM)
- Author
-
Nicolas Matentzoglu, James P Balhoff, Susan M Bello, Chris Bizon, Matthew Brush, Tiffany J Callahan, Christopher G Chute, William D Duncan, Chris T Evelo, Davera Gabriel, John Graybeal, Alasdair Gray, Benjamin M Gyori, Melissa Haendel, Henriette Harmse, Nomi L Harris, Ian Harrow, Harshad B Hegde, Amelia L Hoyt, Charles T Hoyt, Dazhi Jiao, Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz, Simon Jupp, Hyeongsik Kim, Sebastian Koehler, Thomas Liener, Qinqin Long, James Malone, James A McLaughlin, Julie A McMurry, Sierra Moxon, Monica C Munoz-Torres, David Osumi-Sutherland, James A Overton, Bjoern Peters, Tim Putman, Núria Queralt-Rosinach, Kent Shefchek, Harold Solbrig, Anne Thessen, Tania Tudorache, Nicole Vasilevsky, Alex H Wagner, Christopher J Mungall, Bioinformatica, and RS: NUTRIM - R1 - Obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular health
- Subjects
FOS: Computer and information sciences ,Metadata ,Databases, Factual ,INFORMATION ,Databases (cs.DB) ,Data Format ,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology ,Workflow ,QA76 ,Databases ,Networking and Information Technology R&D (NITRD) ,Library and Information Studies ,Computer Science - Databases ,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences ,Factual ,SYSTEM ,Information Systems ,Data Management ,Semantic Web - Abstract
Despite progress in the development of standards for describing and exchanging scientific information, the lack of easy-to-use standards for mapping between different representations of the same or similar objects in different databases poses a major impediment to data integration and interoperability. Mappings often lack the metadata needed to be correctly interpreted and applied. For example, are two terms equivalent or merely related? Are they narrow or broad matches? Are they associated in some other way? Such relationships between the mapped terms are often not documented, leading to incorrect assumptions and making them hard to use in scenarios that require a high degree of precision (such as diagnostics or risk prediction). Also, the lack of descriptions of how mappings were done makes it hard to combine and reconcile mappings, particularly curated and automated ones. The Simple Standard for Sharing Ontological Mappings (SSSOM) addresses these problems by: 1. Introducing a machine-readable and extensible vocabulary to describe metadata that makes imprecision, inaccuracy and incompleteness in mappings explicit. 2. Defining an easy to use table-based format that can be integrated into existing data science pipelines without the need to parse or query ontologies, and that integrates seamlessly with Linked Data standards. 3. Implementing open and community-driven collaborative workflows designed to evolve the standard continuously to address changing requirements and mapping practices. 4. Providing reference tools and software libraries for working with the standard. In this paper, we present the SSSOM standard, describe several use cases, and survey some existing work on standardizing the exchange of mappings, with the goal of making mappings Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR). The SSSOM specification is at http://w3id.org/sssom/spec., Comment: Corresponding author: Christopher J. Mungall
- Published
- 2022