Search

Background and Aims: Polyploids are often hypothesized to have increased phenotypic plasticity compared with their diploid progenitors, but recent work suggests that the relationship between whole-genome duplication (WGD) and plasticity is not so straightforward. Impacts of WGD on plasticity are moderated by other evolutionary processes in nature, which has impeded generalizations regarding the effects of WGD alone. We assessed shifts in phenotypic plasticity and mean trait values accompanying WGD, as well as the adaptive consequences of these shifts., Methods: To isolate WGD effects, we compared two diploid lineages of Arabidopsis thaliana wiht corresponding autotetraploids grown across different salt and nutrient conditions in a growth chamber., Key Results: For the few cases in which diploids and polyploids differed in plasticity, polyploids were more plastic, consistent with hypotheses that WGD increases plasticity. Under stress, increased plasticity was often adaptive (associated with higher total seed mass), but in other cases plasticity was unrelated to fitness. Mean trait values and plasticity were equally likely to be affected by WGD, but the adaptive consequences of these shifts were often context dependent or lineage specific. For example, polyploids had extended life spans, a shift that was adaptive in one polyploid lineage under amenable conditions but was maladaptive in the other lineage under stress., Conclusions: Our work shows that increased phenotypic plasticity can result from WGD alone, independent of other evolutionary processes. We find that the effects of WGD can differ depending on the genotype of the progenitor and the environmental context. Though our experiment was limited to two genotypes of a single species, these findings support the idea that WGD can indeed increase plasticity., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background and Aims: Genome size is hypothesized to affect invasiveness in plants. Key evidence comes from a previous study of invasive eastern North American populations of the grass Phalaris arundinacea: invasive genotypes with smaller genomes had higher growth rates, and genome sizes were smaller in the invasive vs. native range. This study aimed to re-investigate those patterns by examining a broader range of North American populations and by employing the modern best-practice protocol for plant genome size estimation in addition to the previously used protocol., Methods: Genome sizes were measured using both internal and pseudo-internal standardization protocols for 20 invasive and nine native range accessions of P. arundinacea. After a round of vegetative propagation to reduce maternal environmental effects, growth (stem elongation) rates of these accessions were measured in the greenhouse., Key Results: Using the best-practice protocol, there was no evidence of a correlation between genome size and growth rates (P = 0.704), and no evidence for differences in genome sizes of invasive and native range accessions (P > 0.353). However, using the older genome size estimation protocol, both relationships were significant (reproducing the results of the previous study)., Conclusions: Genome size reduction has not driven increased invasiveness in a broad sample of North American P. arundinacea. Further, inappropriate genome size estimation techniques can create spurious correlations between genome size and plant traits such as growth rate. Valid estimation is vital to progress in understanding the potentially widespread effects of genome size on biological processes and patterns.