Search

Objective: A poor functioning dilated left ventricle with mitral regurgitation is the worst condition in chronic ischemic heart failure. Our 7-year experience in combined mitral valve and left ventricular reconstruction was evaluated., Materials and Methods: Among 246 patients having undergone a left ventriculoplasty for postinfarction left ventricular dysfunction in our experience, there were 76 patients with advanced heart failure due to dilated ischemic cardiomyopathy with mitral regurgitation (70 males and 6 females with a mean age of 60 years). All patients had NYHA class III (n = 41) or IV (n = 35) heart failure, including 26 patients (34%) with inotropic support before the operation. All patients had a mitral regurgitation of more than 2+ and 46 patients (61%) had 3+ or more. Mitral reconstruction (61 repairs, 15 replacements) and left ventriculoplasty (Dor 34, SAVE 36, PLV 6) were undergone in combination with CABG (74%)., Results: Operative mortality was 7.9% (5.0% in 60 elective and 18.8% in 16 emergency operations). The ejection fraction and cardiac index increased from 24.9 +/- 7.0% to 33.3 +/- 8.7%, and 2.0 +/- 0.4 l/min/m2 to 2.6 +/- 0.4 l/min/m2, respectively (p < 0.001). The endodiastolic and endosystolic volume indices, and diastolic dimension decreased from 165.9 +/- 43.2 ml/m2 to 121.2 +/- 31.1 ml/m2, 123.3 +/- 38.9 ml/m2 to 74.0 +/- 27.5 ml/m2, and 69.5 +/- 7.7 mm to 61.2 +/- 7.1 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). Late deaths were noted in 13 patients (17.1%), with 10 cardiac deaths. One- and 5-year survival rates were 80.2% and 67.7%, respectively. The mean NYHA class improved from 3.5 to 1.4 among the survivors. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with a mitral regurgitation of 3+ or more and preoperative endosystolic volume index were significant predictors for postoperative mortality. However, age, preoperative inotropes and pulmonary hypertension did not show any significant differences., Conclusion: Combined mitral and left ventricular reconstruction is effective in treating advanced heart failure with endstage ischemic cardiomyopathy associated with a dilated left ventricle and mitral regurgitation.

Background: To treat advanced heart failure due to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, surgical ventricular restoration with mitral reconstruction was conducted and evaluated., Methods: In 95 patients (81 men, mean age: 54 years), New York Heart Association class III/IV was 44/51, and 33 patients (36%) were inotropic dependent preoperatively. Mitral regurgitation (>or=2+) was noted in all patients. All patients underwent left ventriculoplasty (septal anterior ventricular exclusion in 38, partial left ventriculectomy in 57) and mitral reconstruction (repair 53, replacement 42). Fifty-two patients (55%) had concomitant tricuspid repair. Intra-aortic balloon pumping and left ventricular assist device was used in 24 patients and two patients, respectively., Results: Hospital mortality was 11.6% (11 of 95), with 6.6% (5 of 76) in elective and 31.6% (6 of 19) in emergency operations. The ejection fraction and cardiac index increased from 22.3+/-6.3% to 27.2+/-8.0% and from 2.3+/-0.5 ml/m2/min to 2.8+/-0.5 ml/m2/min, respectively (p<0.001). The endodiastolic volume index, endosystolic volume index and diastolic dimension decreased from 232.9+/-56.1 ml/m2 to 160.0+/-49.8 ml/m2, from 178.9+/-46.7 ml/m2 to 113.8+/-44.7 ml/m2 and from 82.0+/-9.0 mm to 68.9+/-11.6 mm, respectively (p<0.001). Late death occurred in 27 patients with 22 cardiac deaths. The mean NYHA class was 1.7 among the survivors. One-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 72.8%, 61.4% and 50.5%, respectively. In the 62 patients who were non-inotropic dependent preoperatively, 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates (81.8%, 73.7% and 62.9%) were significantly better than the inotropic-dependent group (55.3%, 37.3% and 28.0%). Patients with mitral annuloplasty showed a significantly higher 5-year survival rate than patients with mitral valve replacement (59.6% vs 43.6%) in univariate analysis. By application of the exclusion site selection method, the two different ventriculoplasty procedures did not show significant difference in survival rates. Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative inotropes and old age were significant predictors for postoperative mortality., Conclusion: The selected ventriculoplasty in combination with mitral annuloplasty is a useful option for patients with an extremely dilated left ventricle in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Surgery should be considered before inotropic dependency occurs when prior medical treatment has failed.

Objective: Restoration of left ventricle size and shape is an effective surgical procedure in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. This report defines early and intermediate results following the reshaping of the left ventricle from spherical to ellipsoid configuration in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, employing a technique for LV restoration (LVR) that uses form rather than disease as the endpoint for oblique patch placement., Methods: Between 1998 and 2004, a cohort of 83 patients with dilated ischemic cardiomyopathy underwent an operation to reshape the left ventricle. In 54 patients the Dor procedure was done, and 29 underwent the septal anterior ventricular exclusion (SAVE) procedure to emphasize the elliptical shape, whereby patch placement followed an oblique trajectory between the LV apex and septum below the aortic valve. Ventricular form, rather than the disease scar marked the suture placement site endpoint to create an ellipse. The mean age was 58+/-27, but SAVE patients had larger end systolic volume index (135+/-38 vs 95+/-25). Overall preoperative NYHA functional class III was in 69% and IV in 31 patients, but more SAVE patients were in class IV (38% vs 28%). The procedures were elective in 72 and emergent in 11, with similar entry criteria for each procedure., Results: In combination with LVR operation, mitral surgery was performed in 49/83 and tricuspid annuloplasty in 23/83 patients, but these procedures were more common after SAVE (59% vs 44% and 45% vs 19%, respectively), because of larger LV volumes in SAVE patients; 2.8+/-1.3 coronary artery bypass grafts were used. Perioperative use of IABP or LVAD was 15 and 1, respectively in 83 patients. Hospital death was in 1/11 or 9% after emergent operations and 3/72 or 4% in elective procedures, with no difference between groups. After discharge from the hospital, NYHA class improved to class I or II in 57 patients, class III/IV in 14 patients, with 10 late deaths. The 5-year survival rate after the elective operation was 80.3% in SAVE and with elective operation and 77.4% in the Dor procedure., Conclusion: The SAVE or Pacopexy technique is easy to reshape the dilated left ventricle from spherical to ellipsoid form after the LVR, and the resultant improved configuration may contribute to the overall results for patients with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Objective: Left ventricular restoration is used to treat patients with chronic progressive heart failure caused by nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. This study addresses the use of site selection to determine either lateral wall or septal exclusion., Methods: Evolution of intraoperative echocardiography to define the site of poorest contraction and use of multiple biopsies to show the nonhomogeneous nature of damage are reviewed. To address the heterogeneity of extent of fibrosis in nonischemic cardiomyopathy, target selection was used to determine the mode of left ventriculoplasty. Either the lateral wall was excluded by partial left ventriculectomy (PLV) or septal anterior ventricular exclusion (SAVE or Pacopexy) was employed if the septum was primarily diseased. Surgical results in 107 high-risk (43% NYHA (New York Heart Association) class III and 57% class IV) patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy over the past 9 years are reviewed., Results: Overall hospital mortality was 7.1% in 84 elective operations and 60.9% in 23 emergency operations, and fell from 42.8% (6 of 14) to 15.0% (14 of 93), when site selection for the area of left ventricular excision or exclusion was determined by the intraoperative echocardiography test. The SAVE/Pacopexy procedure was performed in 36 patients with 62.2% 5-year survival rate. For the entire cohort of PLV and SAVE/Pacopexy population, overall ejection fraction increased from 20 to 31%, and NYHA class improved from 3.6 to 1.8. The 1-, 5-, and 7-year survival rates were 66.9, 46.0, and 36.2%, respectively. In patients having the operation before inotropic dependent, the survival rate was 78.1, 58.0, and 50.2%, respectively., Conclusions: Left ventriculoplasty is effective for patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy with heart failure by proper patient selection, appropriate timing of the operation, and choice of the surgical procedure (exclusion site selection).

Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) are at an extremely high risk of death and ischemic events. This study aims to evaluate the impact of left ventricular restoration (LVR) and mitral valve surgery on the cardiac and clinical functional status of the patients with ICM. Twenty-six patients (46-80 years, mean: 64 years) with severely dilated heart (left ventricular end-systolic volume index: LVESVI > or = 100 ml/m2) who had coronary artery bypass grafting (2.8+/-1.3), mitral valve surgery, and LVR were enrolled in this study. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume index and LVESVI significantly decreased (from 169+/-44 to 130+/-41 ml/m2, P=0.0005, from 120+/-33 to 89+/-43 ml/m2, P=0.0012). Left ventricular ejection fraction showed no change. MR showed significant improvement (from 2.7+/-0.6 to 1.0+/-0.4, P<0.0001) and NYHA functional class showed improvement (from 3.2+/-0.8 to 1.5+/-0.9, P<0.0001). A 5-year survival rate was 71.2%. In conclusion, this aggressive approach with LVR aiming to treat end-stage ICM by relief of ischemia, reduction of LV wall tension by decreasing LV volume and stopping mitral leak, is effective for LV volume reduction and improvement of clinical functional status.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between left ventricular (LV) wall property and the results of LV volume reduction surgery (LVR) to treat dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in an experimental model., Methods: DCM was introduced in 18 Lewis rats by autoimmunization with cardiac myosin. Among them, 12 rats underwent LVR and the rest were served as controls. They were subjected to echocardiography and cardiac catheterization for dimensional and functional measurements. The animals were sacrificed 4 weeks after surgery, and the fraction of myocardial fibrosis was calculated in 4 divided parts of the LV wall., Results: Percent fibrosis varied widely from 4.7 to 45.2%. LV volume reduction surgery improved cardiac function immediately after surgery in all rats (Emax, 0.28+/-0.14 to 0.48+/-0.18 mmHg/microl; LV end-diastolic pressure, 21.0+/-6.1 to 13.3+/-5.1 mmHg, P<0.05, respectively). Four weeks later, 6 hearts remained in good shape with smaller LV end-diastolic dimension (Dd) than baseline values (LV Dd, 9.7+/-0.6mm; fractional area change (FAC), 40.3+/-8.4%) and the other 6 had more redilation in diameter and more deterioration in function than baseline values (LV Dd, 10.9+/-0.6mm; FAC, 25.8+/-6.9%; P<0.05, respectively). Percent fibrosis in the septum differed 11.1+/-3.4 vs. 27.8+/-2.8% between the two groups (P<0.01). There was a significant correlation between the ratio of LV redilatation after surgery and percent fibrosis in the septum (r=0.951, P<0.01)., Conclusions: Although the initial benefit of LVR was confirmed, the long-term result was affected by the amount of residual fibrosis. This information suggests that surgical site selection is important to achieve a good result of LV restoration surgery for DCM.